Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jesus Malverde

(10,274 posts)
Tue Nov 19, 2013, 10:04 PM Nov 2013

Carriers reject kill switch for stolen smartphones

Samsung Electronics, the world's largest mobile phone manufacturer, has proposed installing a built-in anti-theft measure known as a "kill switch" that would render stolen or lost phones inoperable, but the nation's biggest carriers have rejected the idea, according to San Francisco's top prosecutor.

District Attorney George Gascon said Monday that AT&T Inc., Verizon Wireless, United States Cellular Corp., Sprint Corp. and T-Mobile US Inc. rebuffed Samsung's proposal to preload its phones with Absolute LoJack anti-theft software as a standard feature.

The wireless industry says a kill switch isn't the answer because it could allow a hacker to disable someone's phone.

Gascon, New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman and other law enforcement officials have been demanding that manufacturers create kill switches to combat surging smartphone theft across the country.

http://www.sfgate.com/business/technology/article/Carriers-reject-kill-switch-for-stolen-smartphones-4994216.php

"These emails suggest that the carriers are rejecting a technological solution so they can continue to shake down their customers for billions of dollars in (theft) insurance premiums," Gascon said. "I'm incensed. ... This is a solution that has the potential to end the victimization of their customers."

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Carriers reject kill switch for stolen smartphones (Original Post) Jesus Malverde Nov 2013 OP
Anyone want to bet that carriers are, or will be offering this "feature" for an additional Egalitarian Thug Nov 2013 #1
Why does Samsung need permission to install a kill switch on the phones they make? nt Incitatus Nov 2013 #2
Don't need permission, but the carrier is the only one who could throw the switch. PSPS Nov 2013 #3
Ok, that makes sense. Incitatus Nov 2013 #4
 

Egalitarian Thug

(12,448 posts)
1. Anyone want to bet that carriers are, or will be offering this "feature" for an additional
Tue Nov 19, 2013, 10:23 PM
Nov 2013

monthly charge within the next year?

PSPS

(13,614 posts)
3. Don't need permission, but the carrier is the only one who could throw the switch.
Tue Nov 19, 2013, 10:50 PM
Nov 2013

As was stated in the article, the resistance is motivated only by the carriers' desire for more profits.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Carriers reject kill swit...