hasn't reached public awareness yet.

TPP belongs to President Obama and while working for him she was dutiful in her job as SOS but by 2016 she will be four years removed from implementing his directives.

I think it is amusing that those upset with President Obama over this matter work hard to blame it on Hillary as if she was the President and not him. Serious disconnect...

if the TPP passes. There's going to be plenty of outrage to go around on this one, and anyone remotely associated with it is likely to be blamed, for years to come.

in the negotiations, passing, or implementation that is just silly.

AFP and other winger attack ads on Clinton will expose her, not to the Republican base who were taught to hate her decades ago, but to the Democratic base, most of whom are unaware of her ties to Wall Street and WalMart.

I think that there will be several candidates running in 2016, but if Hillary does choose to run, I think that Liz will stick to her guns and not run. I don't see neither Biden nor Warren running against Hillary, if she runs. They respect and like each other. In Biden's case, they have been friends for years.

That's why Biden didn't run in 2008.

I like him, he's a decent man, but he did extremely poorly in his last two attempts. Aside from the fact that he's already in his 70s. It wouldn't be realistic for him to run.

I think she should sit this one out and wait her turn.

It's Joe's time to be President.

Biden barely garnered around 1% of the vote, Hillary missed the nomination by a hair. There's no comparison.

There's also no clamoring for a Biden run. The Democratic party will not nominate in 2016 a 74 year old man. There will be other more viable candidates in the running.

I think that Biden is a terrific person, but he's not going to be our nominee.

Look, maybe Joe can tap her to be his Vice President.

We've never had a female VP.

And it's bloody time that we have one.

She has to wait her turn.

This time - it's personal.

if he uses the Presidential primary stage to promote progressive values that most Americans support.
It would push Hillary to the left and force her to make a public statement about income inequality and how Wall Street profits off of it.

Although he stated that he wouldn't run as a "spoiler" and would only run if he thought that he had a chance of winning. Bernie I do se getting into the mix to stir things up.

I think that the decision to run (everybody, not just him) will depend on public opinion next year. If it looks like we won't have a chance in 2016, some may decide to sit it out.

that she is up to her neck in Wall Street entanglements.

As these graphics demonstrate:





If so, the electorate just needs to be educated. Sane and informed liberals are rightly concerned about Hillary's connections to Wall Street, and we think very highly of Elizabeth Warren.

-Laelth

of absolutely nothing.

I think the authors are misguided, mind you, but it was interesting, all the same.

While I'm here, let me offer the following:

Help encourage Elizabeth Warren to run for President in 2016 by writing to her or e-mailing her here:

The Honorable Elizabeth Warren
317 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
Phone: (202) 224-4543

E-mail her here.

Donate here.

Add an Elizabeth Warren banner to your DU signature line here.

No harm in expressing a preference for a politician. I still think that she meant what she said, but time will tell.

That doesn't mean she can't change her mind. She's a politician, after all. She keeps her options open.



-Laelth

The article cited in the OP is a good article and has some interesting polling data in it.




I like Warren and gave her money in 2012 but I am going to wait until after 2014 before I worry about the nominee. I suspect that things will be clearer after the 2014 midterms. I am not convinced that Hillary Clinton is a horrible choice or that she would not stand up to Wall Street. I am also not convinced that Senator Warren could be a stronger candidate compared to Hillary Clinton in a general election and I seriously doubt that Senator Warren would be competitive in Texas. Texans like Hillary Clinton and I believe Hillary Clinton would have a far better chance in Texas and other states compared to Senator Warren

First, and most important, if we don't get cracking working on the midterm elections we are going to get clobbered.

Second, because The New Republic notwithstanding, there doesn't seem to be at present a huge outcry across the party for a Warren nomination.

Third, it's too soon for these silly food fights. There'll be enough people who will make a decision about running in 2016 after the midterms, no need to start arguing right now.

I was agreeing with your position. I found the article to be very interesting

Just shut up and get busy you little worker bees.