Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

SoCalDem

(103,856 posts)
Fri Mar 9, 2012, 08:27 PM Mar 2012

Coke reveals its secret: It may need to carry a cancer warning

Coke reveals its secret: It may need to carry a cancer warning
http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/health-news/coke-reveals-its-secret-it-may-need-to-carry-a-cancer-warning-7547457.html

Drinks firm forced to change recipe in California after ingredient classed as health hazard
Rob Hastings Author
Saturday 10 March 2012


Nightmares about the backlash they suffered the last time they dared to change the secret recipe for their drink still most likely haunt Coca-Cola executives. But 27 years after the ill-fated launch of New Coke, the threat of having a cancer warning placed on their famous red bottles is forcing them to revise the closely guarded ingredients again. With its arch rival Pepsi, Coca-Cola is altering its drink in the US after the state of California declared one of its flavourings a carcinogen – though it will continue to sell the old form of the drink in Britain and the rest of Europe, with no cautionary labelling.

The two drinks have been made to include less of the chemical 4-methylimidazole, a caramel flavouring known as 4-MEI, which the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences in the US has linked it to cancer in mice and leukaemia in rats. It can be formed during the process of cooking certain ingredients and consequently may be found in minor amounts in many foods. Under Californian law, drinks containing a certain level of carcinogens must have a cancer-warning label on their packaging.

But the two companies – which, combined, make up 90 per cent of the soft-drink market in the US – insist the ingredient is not a health risk. Coca-Cola said yesterday the cancer warning is: "scientifically unfounded", while also maintaining that the company has been able to make the changes through a "manufacturing process modification" rather than a full change of formula. "The caramel colour in all of our products has been, is and always will be safe," a spokesperson said.

snip

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Coke reveals its secret: It may need to carry a cancer warning (Original Post) SoCalDem Mar 2012 OP
put the "coca" back in coca-cola and dump the 4-methylimidazole lol nt msongs Mar 2012 #1
everything in California has cancer warning. Johonny Mar 2012 #2
The article is technically accurate, but massively over sensationalized mythology Mar 2012 #3

Johonny

(20,864 posts)
2. everything in California has cancer warning.
Fri Mar 9, 2012, 09:18 PM
Mar 2012

Californians are so saturated with the warnings do people pay attention to them?

 

mythology

(9,527 posts)
3. The article is technically accurate, but massively over sensationalized
Fri Mar 9, 2012, 11:02 PM
Mar 2012

The FDA says you would need to drink 1,000 cans of Coke or Pepsi a day in order to have it reach the threshold that was used to say it causes cancer in rats.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Coke reveals its secret: ...