General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAttorney for a Walker aide says the new Walker Defense Fund suggests Walker -is- under investigation
Of course there is the desire to make it look as though your client was just doing the bidding of his boss when he broke the law. And we can't be sure that line of reasoning also suggests that your client is willing to talk about how the boss communicated his biddings, but it's still interesting to see the fire getting close enough to Walker that he's looking for help with asbestos underwear....
http://www.jsonline.com/watchdog/noquarter/walker-sets-up-legaldefense-fund-f64gqrb-142164553.html
At the front end of the article we get this: Several election lawyers said creation of the defense fund serves as a tacit acknowledgment that Walker is under investigation for election law violations. "If you create a legal-defense fund, you are either being investigated, being charged with or have been convicted of a criminal violation of Chapter 11 or Chapter 12," said retired state election lawyer George Dunst, referring to the statutes dealing with campaign finance and election fraud."
To which the Walker camp responds ."We reiterate that Gov. Walker has been told that he is not a target of this investigation," Matthews said.
Toward the end we get this: "Michael Maistelman, an election lawyer who is representing former Walker aide Tim Russell in the John Doe investigation, said people could draw conclusions from Walker's decision to create a defense fund. "The only way you can set that up is if you are under investigation or being prosecuted," Maistelman said. "One can only draw the conclusion that either one of those two things is happening.""
Many of us will of course remember the education we got on the use of the words 'target of investigation' as Fitzpatrick investigated the 'person of interest' Scooter Libby.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)From the Cognitive Dissidence blog...
Walkergate: The Legal Cooperation Fund
Ever since Scott Walker announced that he has retained two high profile attorneys to help his cooperation with the ongoing Walkergate investigation, one of the most repeated questions is who's paying for them?
There was little doubt that a good chunk of the more than $12 million would be going to these two, but he couldn't pay them from the campaign.
In what is becoming an almost weekly tradition for Walker, he pulled another late Friday afternoon news bomb to state that he was creating a legal cooperation fund. But wouldn't you know, that darn liberal media goes and keeps calling it a legal defense fund. As if Walker did anything wrong, right?
As one of my friends quipped, "$2,000 an hour buys some premium cooperation."
"Legal Cooperation Fund" is kinda like "Blue Sky Act" and "Republican ethics".
Nice bracelets Scooter!!!
[IMG][/IMG]
rucky
(35,211 posts)TroglodyteScholar
(5,477 posts)Little Scotty swirling around the toilet bowl...