Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
Sat Mar 10, 2012, 12:55 PM Mar 2012

right wingers attack innovative $50 light bulb because they can't do math

http://www.nationofchange.org/right-wingers-attack-innovative-50-light-bulb-because-they-can-t-do-math-1331396115



A slanted Wash­ing­ton Post story by Peter Who­riskey at­tacked the in­no­v­a­tive $50 light bulb that won the De­part­ment of En­ergy’s $10 mil­lion L Prize for light­ing in­no­va­tion as being “costly,” “ex­or­bi­tant,” and “too pricey” in com­par­i­son to a $1 in­can­des­cent bulb — based on faulty math. The Philips LED bulb, which is as­sem­bled in Wis­con­sin with com­puter chips made in Cal­i­for­nia, is a tech­ni­cal break­through, with high-ef­fi­ciency nat­ural-color light. At no point does the ar­ti­cle — which ap­peared on­line with the ten­den­tious head­line “Gov­ern­ment-sub­si­dized green light bulb car­ries costly price tag” — com­pare the life­time cost of the su­per-ef­fi­cient (10-watt), long-last­ing (30-year) bulb with that of tra­di­tional 60-watt light bulbs. An ac­com­pa­ny­ing in­fo­graphic pre­pared by Pat­ter­son Clark and Bon­nie Berkowitz com­pared costs, as­sert­ing that the life­time cost of the $50 bulb plus elec­tric­ity would end up being $5 more than tra­di­tional bulbs:


Wash­ing­ton Post graphic in­cor­rectly claims life­time cost of $50 LED bulb is $5 higher than tra­di­tional in­can­des­cents.

Un­for­tu­nately for the Wash­ing­ton Post’s cred­i­bil­ity, the cost cal­cu­la­tion was ex­tremely wrong. Clark and Berkowitz’s as­sess­ment as­sumes that the kilo­watt-hour price of elec­tric­ity is $0.01, in­stead of ac­tual av­er­age re­tail price of $0.12 and ris­ing. This fac­tor-of-ten error de­mol­ishes the en­tire premise of Who­riskey’s ar­ti­cle. ThinkProgress Green has pre­pared a cor­rected graph, based on a low-ball es­ti­mate of $0.10/kWh elec­tric­ity:


A cor­rected ver­sion of the Wash­ing­ton Post light­bulb cost com­par­i­son shows $50 LED bulb over $100 cheaper than in­can­des­cents. Pre­pared by ThinkProgress Green.


20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
right wingers attack innovative $50 light bulb because they can't do math (Original Post) xchrom Mar 2012 OP
Yet another battle in the ongoing RW War on Energy-Efficient Lighting Cirque du So-What Mar 2012 #1
And tech improvements will reduce that cost almost overnight. Zalatix Mar 2012 #2
Gee, I'd love to get electricity at $0.01 per Kwh tech3149 Mar 2012 #3
Heh, $0.12 per kilowatt/hr. I'd love cheap electricity like that. NutmegYankee Mar 2012 #4
I'll believe the 30 year lifespan when I see it. Snake Alchemist Mar 2012 #5
Especially with compact flourescence Mopar151 Mar 2012 #7
They are LED's not flourescence. I'm an electrician and I do believe the life span. Lochloosa Mar 2012 #8
Im not an electrician, but I do have an LED bulb quakerboy Mar 2012 #17
To add some actual numbers to my assertion quakerboy Mar 2012 #18
LEDs are completely different technology Major Nikon Mar 2012 #14
Everyone knows it will save in the long run Ter Mar 2012 #6
Just think of putting in a light bulb and never having to change it in your lifetime Lochloosa Mar 2012 #9
Or having a potential landlord sweep her hand across the apartment and say Robb Mar 2012 #10
The initial cost is a real problem for low income people eridani Mar 2012 #11
I agree...the savings for the poor and the country would pay for that many times over Lochloosa Mar 2012 #16
It's less hazardous than an incandescent, for one thing jmowreader Mar 2012 #12
K&R....n/t unkachuck Mar 2012 #13
Replaced every light bulb, except for one, with CFL and LEDs last year rufus dog Mar 2012 #15
We did all CFL's a while back quakerboy Mar 2012 #19
Didn't get any "low cost" ones - rufus dog Mar 2012 #20

Cirque du So-What

(25,953 posts)
1. Yet another battle in the ongoing RW War on Energy-Efficient Lighting
Sat Mar 10, 2012, 01:13 PM
Mar 2012

You think the WP is going to actually fact-check the blurbs prepared by RW shills? When they're not trying desperately to turn back the clock on human progress, they're trying to keep technology hopelessly dependent upon wasteful devices dating back over a century. Thomas Edison, who - despite his genius - was an anachronistic holdover from the Age of Robber Barons, allowed his ego to dictate that DC transmission of electricity should be the standard, despite a limited range that would ensure that no one living more than a few miles from a power station would ever have electric power available in their homes. If not for the efforts of visionaries like Nicola Tesla and the industrialist whose mind he managed to change, George Westinghouse, Edison's ego would have carried the day.

Another thing: despite a $50 price tag currently, haven't the assclowns who prepared this specious cost analysis ever heard the term 'economies of scale?' The price would plummet dramatically once the lighting industry gets tooled-up to meet demand for the new bulbs. I wish the invisible hand of the free market would bitch-slap both of them upside the head.

tech3149

(4,452 posts)
3. Gee, I'd love to get electricity at $0.01 per Kwh
Sat Mar 10, 2012, 01:23 PM
Mar 2012

To think I've been paying anywhere from 12 to 15 cents per Kwh. Either I'm stupid or they're delusional.

 

Snake Alchemist

(3,318 posts)
5. I'll believe the 30 year lifespan when I see it.
Sat Mar 10, 2012, 01:32 PM
Mar 2012

I never get the lifespan claimed by bulb manufacturers.

Mopar151

(9,992 posts)
7. Especially with compact flourescence
Sat Mar 10, 2012, 04:57 PM
Mar 2012

Maybe voltage spikes, maybe problems with heat or orientation in fixtures - but the "5-year" go about 9 months for me.

Lochloosa

(16,067 posts)
8. They are LED's not flourescence. I'm an electrician and I do believe the life span.
Sat Mar 10, 2012, 10:38 PM
Mar 2012

And another added benefit is the lack of heat output.

quakerboy

(13,920 posts)
17. Im not an electrician, but I do have an LED bulb
Sun Mar 11, 2012, 02:34 PM
Mar 2012

And I do not believe the lifespan touted.

Virtually nothing lasts as long as advertised. CFL's certaintly do not. I believe that the burn time of the LED itself is 30 years. But, as with the CFL's before them, it will be the electronics in the base that will burn out long before 30 years has passed.

As to heat... every LED bulb for a standard socket that Ive seen have massive heat sinks on the base. Which indicates to me that there must be some heat buildup somewhere, unless you think they are adding that much weight just for appearances. My experience with the LED bulb I have is that its heat output is approximately equal to that of a CFL. Nowhere near incandescent, but still a fair bit of waste heat. Which is a big part of why I think the electronics will likely burn out long before that 30 year mark.

LED's are not cost effective yet. You can get a bulb for less than the $50 advertised. And they are massive savers compared to incandescent energy use. But LED savings compared to CFL is fairly minimal. And if you watch sales, you can get CFL's for a buck or two. $30 vs $2, when there is only a watt or two difference is a much harder sell than when there is a 45 watt difference.

quakerboy

(13,920 posts)
18. To add some actual numbers to my assertion
Sun Mar 11, 2012, 02:50 PM
Mar 2012

Looking at 60 watt equivalents, readily available in your local HD:

The CFL is 14 watts, 900 lumen, with an estimated operating cost of 1.69/year, cost of $1.74/bulb
http://www.homedepot.com/h_d1/N-5yc1v/R-100687000/h_d2/ProductDisplay?catalogId=10053&langId=-1&keyword=cfl&storeId=10051

The LED is 13 watt, 850 lumen, with an estimated operating cost of 1.57/year, cost of 23.97/bulb
http://www.homedepot.com/Electrical-Light-Bulbs-LED-Light-Bulbs/h_d1/N-5yc1vZbm79Z12kz/R-202668646/h_d2/ProductDisplay?catalogId=10053&langId=-1&storeId=10051

Quick math says that it takes 185 years to break even on the cost via energy savings.

I cant prove this, but I believe that we can make LED lighting that is far more efficient. Right now, we make them to stick in standard light sockets. I assume this is a big part of why they need the big heat sinks. Waste heat means wasted energy. Find a better way to power them, and I would assume that they could be far more efficient than what we currently have available.

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
14. LEDs are completely different technology
Sun Mar 11, 2012, 12:40 AM
Mar 2012

LEDs are solid state devices. Mercury vapor (which includes CFLs) and incandescent lights use tungsten filiments and aren't that far removed from vaccum tube technology.

Robb

(39,665 posts)
10. Or having a potential landlord sweep her hand across the apartment and say
Sat Mar 10, 2012, 10:58 PM
Mar 2012

...You'll never have to change any of those. Or a realtor talking about a house.

Or a plant manager pointing at the lights above the assembly line!

eridani

(51,907 posts)
11. The initial cost is a real problem for low income people
Sat Mar 10, 2012, 11:05 PM
Mar 2012

They pay more for everything because they can't afford to save money. No big freezers to store big quantities of sale items, no space to store 8 months worth of toilet paper and paper towels, no cars to haul big piles of sale items, etc. Subsidies would go a long way to help out here.

jmowreader

(50,561 posts)
12. It's less hazardous than an incandescent, for one thing
Sat Mar 10, 2012, 11:55 PM
Mar 2012

This bulb lasts 30 years. I assume it's got surge suppressors and all that good stuff to keep America's Crappy Electricity from beating the hell out of it. So you get a ladder, go up there, screw the thing in and you're done.

Depending on where you live, you will go through anywhere from two to 12 incandescents per fixture per year. (I'm not kidding--in Fayettenam, incandescent bulbs last a month because of voltage spikes.) Let's be kind and say you use two light bulbs a year. This gives you, over the 30 year lifespan of the LED bulb, sixty opportunities to fall off a chair and break your damn fool neck changing bulbs, sixty opportunities to drop a blown-out bulb and wind up with a shard of glass in the sole of your foot, sixty opportunities to run out of bulbs when the store is closed and fall down the stairs in the dark...

Also think: there are a LOT of places in the modern home where installing new bulbs is very hard because of ceiling heights or what have you.

Besides, when the LED bulb gets popular (if for no other reason than you don't ever have to change it) Philips will ramp up production in their own factories and also license the design to other light bulb companies. Compact fluorescents used to be very expensive and now they are very cheap--because people are buying them more now.

 

rufus dog

(8,419 posts)
15. Replaced every light bulb, except for one, with CFL and LEDs last year
Sun Mar 11, 2012, 12:49 AM
Mar 2012

Put LEDs in the high use areas and CFLs in others. Cost was high, but the savings have already covered the costs. Was careful not to use off brand CFLs to make sure I didn't have poor quality and have replacements within a year.

In hindsight it might have been a mistake not to go 100% LED but didn't want to take the risk until the cost was covered. When the CFLs burn out I will replace with the LEDs.

Only downside is the CFLs take a bit of time to come up when it is cold. (In Southern Cal not a huge issue)

quakerboy

(13,920 posts)
19. We did all CFL's a while back
Sun Mar 11, 2012, 02:54 PM
Mar 2012

That easily paid for itself, quickly, in electricity savings.

I only have one LED, from a store going out of business sale that made it almost affordable. Where did you get LED's that were affordable?

 

rufus dog

(8,419 posts)
20. Didn't get any "low cost" ones -
Tue Mar 13, 2012, 01:55 AM
Mar 2012

One kid has a ceiling fan with five lights that she leave on way too often, replaced all of those with LEDs and they were expensive. Got some $40 spot LEDs for the kitchen, (the other high use area) and bathroom at Home Depot during a sale. Did see a post that Phillips has a $25 to $30 LED now so when the CFLs burn out hopefully I can get some $15 to $20 LEDs as replacements.


edit to "low cost" from "affordable" in Reply

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»right wingers attack inno...