General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNational Park Foundation spends more on itself than on parks.
WASHINGTON, DC Most individual gifts to the official fundraising arm for the National Park Service never reach the parks themselves, according to Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER). Personal contributions to the National Park Foundation are far more likely to be absorbed by overhead, fundraising expenses or the care and feeding of corporate donors.
The National Park Foundation (NPF) is a congressionally-chartered tax-exempt corporation designated to accept and administer gifts for the benefit of the National Park Service so as to further the conservation or natural, scenic, historic, scientific, educational, inspirational, or recreational resources for future generations of Americans, in the words of its enabling statute (16 U.S.C. § 19e). That status also excuses it from detailed reporting requirements imposed on other charities.
snip
A major plank of the National Park Service strategic plan for its 2016 centennial calls for creation of a billion dollar corporate-financed endowment through NPF to be administered outside the federal appropriation process. The plan makes no provision for guarding against corporate contributors using big donations to leverage access or influence over park policy, such as the recent role of Coca Cola in blocking bans on sales of plastic water bottles inside national parks.
There is no real accountability or transparency in the National Park Foundation, Ruch added, pointing out that NPF does not believe it is subject to the Freedom of Information Act but surrendered documents PEER requested to settle a FOIA lawsuit PEER filed against it. Part of the problem is that the National Park Foundation sees itself as a private corporation without obligation to the public.
http://www.sonorannews.com/archives/2012/120307/frontpage-nationalPark.html
ProSense
(116,464 posts)"The conservative voice of Arizona."
We have been called a birther paper because we have doubted Obama is eligible for many reasons, including where he was born and who is father was. But any reasoning person would wonder why Obama has gone to such expense to hide his past. There are estimates Obama has paid $2 million to block access to his birth certificate, school records, travel records and a whole lot more.
http://www.sonorannews.com/archives/2012/120307/myview.html
snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)The article is the verbatim Press Release from Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER) which is anything but a RW organization.
http://www.peer.org/index.php
Press release
http://www.peer.org/news/news_id.php?row_id=1561
ProSense
(116,464 posts)"A shooting the messenger knee jerk reaction."
Then why didn't you just post the "verbatim Press Release"?
Instead you send people to a disgusting wingnut site to try to determine what's real and what's a distortion.