Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mother earth

(6,002 posts)
Sat Nov 30, 2013, 04:06 PM Nov 2013

Noam Chomsky, a Conspiracy Theorist of the Highest Magnitude

One of the main problems with our society is that words have lost their meaning. In spoken languages, the tone of a word can be used to make inferences that may be completely unrelated to the meaning of the word. This is especially true when dealing with propaganda. When certain people or organizations want to dismiss an argument, they tend to phrase words in such a way that makes them appear illogical or treacherous if given credence.

One of these words is “conspiracy”, and when put together with the word “theory” it becomes the infamous phrase “Conspiracy Theory”. Let’s take a look at the definition of these two words and try to figure out why they have been used to discredit not only people, but history, data, and facts.

The legal definition of conspiracy is “an agreement between two or more persons to commit an illegal or unlawful act, or to achieve a legal act but by illegal or unlawful means.” A theory is “a concept that is not yet verified but that if true would explain certain facts or phenomena.”

So a conspiracy theory is a conjecture that two or more people may have planned an unlawful act, and if certain facts are proven to be true, then the conspiracy theory becomes reality.

As we all know, throughout history our governments and politicians have done exactly what the above states. They have conspired to obtain power, to overthrow governments, to destroy their political rivals, and to make money. Politics is littered with conspiracies but the mainstream media treats this word with contempt. Have we forgotten Watergate, Tonkin, Iran-Contra, Basra, Pinochet, Mohammad Mosaddeq, Reichstag, Pearl Harbor, Oklahoma City, Waco, Ruby Ridge, Pine Ridge, COINTELPRO, Oswald and JFK, Northwoods, Condor, Iraq, 911, LIBOR, Robo-Signing round one, Robo-Signing round two, HSBC, The War on Drugs, and much more?

Excerpts from & continued at link:
Noam Chomsky, a Conspiracy Theorist of the Highest Magnitude: Defining Conspiracy Theory, What are the Theories Behind the Conspiracies?
http://www.thepeoplesvoice.org/TPV3/Voices.php/2013/05/22/noam-chomsky-a-conspiracy-theorist-of-th

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Noam Chomsky, a Conspiracy Theorist of the Highest Magnitude (Original Post) mother earth Nov 2013 OP
. snagglepuss Nov 2013 #1
I agree with Chomsky on this. Whisp Nov 2013 #2
The legal definition of a conspiracy is different from the popular usage definition. DanTex Nov 2013 #3
"One of the main problems with our society is that words have lost their meaning." K&R Egalitarian Thug Nov 2013 #4
 

Whisp

(24,096 posts)
2. I agree with Chomsky on this.
Sat Nov 30, 2013, 04:17 PM
Nov 2013

CT accusations are often made just to humiliate and put people down.

The proper definition, taken from that article:
So a conspiracy theory is a conjecture that two or more people may have planned an unlawful act, and if certain facts are proven to be true, then the conspiracy theory becomes reality.

As if that doesn't happen on an hourly basis. I am interested to hear from people who hold all Theories as whacko conspiracies lizardmen stories and say that at the same time the Iraq war was illegally being hatched.


DanTex

(20,709 posts)
3. The legal definition of a conspiracy is different from the popular usage definition.
Sat Nov 30, 2013, 04:19 PM
Nov 2013

Legally, if Oswald had a drinking buddy who helped him plan the JFK assassination, that would be a "conspiracy." And, sure, maybe it's possible that that kind of conspiracy actually happened.

But that doesn't make much difference. If it were two lone nuts instead of one, who cares, it's still the same basic story. And it certainly wouldn't satisfy JFK conspiracy theorists, who insist that there was some kind of Oliver Stone/Jason Bourne thing going on where a secret powerful group in the CIA/FBI/MIC/BFEE/whatever whose interest were contrary to JFK's politics, so they arranged for him to be killed.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Noam Chomsky, a Conspirac...