Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

FreeJoe

(1,039 posts)
Sun Dec 1, 2013, 05:38 PM Dec 2013

How would you fix the pension/401K problem?

It is clear that the use of defined contribution savings plans has failed to provide adequate retirement savings for the bulk of the US population. Pensions had their own drawbacks, including locking you in to crappy employers and putting your retirement savings at the risk of mismanagement of your employer.

What would your solution be? How would you set up a retirement system that works for people that don't have investing skills and don't have the discipline to save, but in a way that doesn't put them at the mercy of their corporate employers?

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How would you fix the pension/401K problem? (Original Post) FreeJoe Dec 2013 OP
Unlimited 401k/IRA - why limit it to such a low amount? taught_me_patience Dec 2013 #1
That would help the billionaire hedge fund boys Warpy Dec 2013 #2
You can save as much as you want, just not tax favored. Hoyt Dec 2013 #4
Put all the monies into Social Security. NT alfie Dec 2013 #3
Make a defined retirement fund a requirement. Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Dec 2013 #5
That sounds good.. sendero Dec 2013 #7
That's true Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Dec 2013 #8
Correct.. sendero Dec 2013 #10
No, pensions should not be tied to employers. former9thward Dec 2013 #9
You're supposed to be able to keep what pension benefits you acrue. Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Dec 2013 #11
Pensions take years to vest. former9thward Dec 2013 #12
Nothing is going to change.... sendero Dec 2013 #6
People seem to think that in the relatively recent SheilaT Dec 2013 #13
Do away with employer plans, 401K, 403B, etc. Allow employer pretax contributions to IRAs. FarCenter Dec 2013 #14
 

taught_me_patience

(5,477 posts)
1. Unlimited 401k/IRA - why limit it to such a low amount?
Sun Dec 1, 2013, 05:41 PM
Dec 2013

also do away with the income caps for IRAs. Let people save as much as they want!

Warpy

(111,317 posts)
2. That would help the billionaire hedge fund boys
Sun Dec 1, 2013, 05:47 PM
Dec 2013

What would help us is keeping the cap but doubling the amount and then indexing it to inflation. At that point, we'd need to raise our wages to a point working people could contribute something meaningful to it.

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(108,135 posts)
5. Make a defined retirement fund a requirement.
Sun Dec 1, 2013, 06:11 PM
Dec 2013

The way most companies used to (and some still) do it. Many of the corporations (Boeing for example) that want to end a traditional pension want to raise the SS eligibility age to 70.

sendero

(28,552 posts)
7. That sounds good..
Sun Dec 1, 2013, 06:19 PM
Dec 2013

... sounded good to my wife's (now passed) father, but guess what? When the steel company he was a middle manager for got bought through typical financial machinations that are commonplace today, his pension was mostly dissolved. (I believe there was a bankruptcy involved but as I am sure you know, companies routinely are allowed to declare themselves bankrupt even though they are not broke at all)



Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(108,135 posts)
8. That's true
Sun Dec 1, 2013, 06:24 PM
Dec 2013

Remember how the Republicans made bankruptcy harder for individuals? They didn't do the same for corporations.

Most likely your father in-law's pension went to shareholder dividends or the CEO's bonus.

sendero

(28,552 posts)
10. Correct..
Sun Dec 1, 2013, 06:29 PM
Dec 2013

... as far as I can tell, bankruptcy for a corp is easier than ever.

The events I described happened back in the late 80s, when this sort of financial skullduggery was just taking hold.

former9thward

(32,064 posts)
9. No, pensions should not be tied to employers.
Sun Dec 1, 2013, 06:24 PM
Dec 2013

And health insurance should not either. You shouldn't have to stick with an employer you don't like just to keep the pension or insurance.

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(108,135 posts)
11. You're supposed to be able to keep what pension benefits you acrue.
Sun Dec 1, 2013, 06:29 PM
Dec 2013

You may not be able to collect them till you're a certain age but in theory they're supposed to be there when you retire.

Healthcare on the other hand has been a benefit that you're employer supplies only while they employ you.

former9thward

(32,064 posts)
12. Pensions take years to vest.
Sun Dec 1, 2013, 06:47 PM
Dec 2013

Normally five years. So if you work for someone for three years and leave you will receive no pension benefits at any age. A lot of people move around from job to job and they would not get any benefits.

sendero

(28,552 posts)
6. Nothing is going to change....
Sun Dec 1, 2013, 06:16 PM
Dec 2013

.... so I'd prefer not to speculate.

Right now, today, 90% of Americans are set to retire (if they ever actually do) below the poverty level.

Why have these programs been such a failure? There are some obvious reasons, stock market crashes in 2000 and 2008 that wiped out huge amounts of holdings (another one coming any year now, bank on it), failure to actually contribute the amounts necessary to the fund to cover retirement income for a reasonable lifespan, what else?????

I quit contributing because the whole model of tax deferment assumes you will be spending a lot less when you retire and that the income tax rate will be commensurately lower, both dubious assumptions at best.

 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
13. People seem to think that in the relatively recent
Sun Dec 1, 2013, 07:06 PM
Dec 2013

past almost all workers had good pensions.

That's just not true. I don't know the exact numbers, but at best around 50% of employees were ever covered by a pension. As has already been pointed out they take years to vest. It used to be ten years, but in the very late 70's that was changed to five years. Which still means that if you leave before the vesting period is up, you lose whatever amount the company has put in, although you get to keep your own contribution.

Plus, a lot of those pensions aren't all that generous. I worked for ten years (1969-1979)for airlines that eventually became USAir. I was vested in their pension plan, and when I finally started taking it this past August when I turned 65, it's all of $172.31/month. It's better than nothing, but it's not very much. Social Security is a vastly better deal.

Nonetheless, companies with some minimum number of employees (25? 50? someone else can figure that out) should probably be required to have a pension plan and should not be allowed to underfund it. That's the biggest thing.

City and state governments have gotten away with underfunding their pension obligations, and there's going to be hell to pay at some point in the foreseeable future. It's not just Detroit. I can recall reading articles at least as far back as the 1980's (and I'm thinking I was seeing them the decade before) that unfunded public pensions were a ticking time bomb.

 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
14. Do away with employer plans, 401K, 403B, etc. Allow employer pretax contributions to IRAs.
Sun Dec 1, 2013, 07:13 PM
Dec 2013

Allow employers to contribute up to 10% of wages pre-tax to employee's IRAs. Make a 3% contribution the default unless employee opts out. Allow employees to contribute up to 20% to pre or post tax IRAs.

Employers should pay wages. They should not be in the benefits business.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How would you fix the pen...