Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 08:15 AM Dec 2013

Where The Minimum Wage Would Be If It Kept Pace With The Earnings Of The 1%

http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2013/12/01/3007011/minimum-wage-percent-leave-workers/



If the minimum wage had grown at the same rate as the earnings of the top one percent of Americans the federal wage floor would be more than triple the current hourly minimum of $7.25. Instead, the minimum wage has been lower than a poverty wage ever since 1982.

The New York Times compiled those and other basic facts about the minimum wage into an infographic. Together with demographic data about who actually holds minimum-wage jobs — less than a quarter of the minimum-wage workforce are teenagers, and nearly four in ten are over the age of 30 — the graphic makes the fundamental case for fighting inequality and economic hardship by raising the minimum wage. The horizontal red line in the Times graphic indicates the hourly wage necessary for a single parent working full-time with one child to avoid poverty:



One puzzle piece missing in the graphic is race. Since racial minorities are over-represented among the minimum wage workforce, raising the minimum wage to just $10.10 would lift 3.5 million people of color out of poverty.

The stagnation and collapse of minimum wage purchasing power has helped drive the divergence between the wealthiest and poorest segments of the U.S. workforce. As minimum-wage jobs have provided less and less stable economic footing for working people, the wealthiest sliver of the country has seen astronomical gains in their compensation. If instead the federal minimum wage had grown at the same rate as one-percenter earnings, it would sit at $22.62 per hour today — 212 percent higher than the current wage floor.
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

madokie

(51,076 posts)
2. The only reason its as good percentage wise as it is
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 08:32 AM
Dec 2013

because they've cut everyones wages who are paid by the hour to the bone. Otherwise that 37% would be closer to 20%

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
4. It's about the same amount ($22.62) if you look at the increase in worker productivity.
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 10:18 AM
Dec 2013

I've said this on my show many times. One of the differences between now and pre 1968 that has caused the wealth differential between the 1% and everyone else is that the owner class is pocketing the difference between the increase in productivity from the pre 1970's US and today since wages have not increased.

Ikonoklast

(23,973 posts)
6. Unless the race to the bottom is wages is stopped, within one more generation the economy
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 10:32 AM
Dec 2013

of this nation is doomed to fail.

It is that simple.

Turning citizens into net tax payers from net tax users should be the goal of government and every business in this nation, as it also gives those that need it the most disposable income to stimulate economic growth by spending on higher-value purchases, and pay higher net taxes which will enable this nation to finally re-invest in itself without borrowing to subsidize businesses.


It's a long-term win/win strategy for workers and employers.

But the 1% only sees four quarters out and demands instant gratification and massive returns on their gambles .

greymattermom

(5,754 posts)
8. increases should at least match Congress
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 12:33 PM
Dec 2013

What would it be if the increases were tied to pay for Congress? Social security? Federal workers? Just curious.

Bill USA

(6,436 posts)
11. THese facts must be presented on web-sites all over the internet. THey need to be repeated just as
Tue Dec 3, 2013, 04:11 PM
Dec 2013

much as the idiotic ideology of Trickle Down Econocomics. Maybe enough people will start to realize their suspicions, that they have been somehow screwed, are supported by the facts.

People should also criticize and mock the GOP toadieville of M$M for repeating Trickle-Down horseshit as if it was generally accepted superstition while being ever so careful to not mention the empirical evidence proves Trickle-Down Supply-Side Econocomics is nonsense, demonstrated by the facts to be total bullshit.

Recommended!!

Bookmarked.

ReRe

(10,597 posts)
12. And actually....
Wed Dec 4, 2013, 06:41 AM
Dec 2013

.... it should be MORE than $22.62/hr.

Since this is such an "exceptional" country and all.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Where The Minimum Wage Wo...