Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

riverbendviewgal

(4,252 posts)
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 12:30 PM Dec 2013

Warning! USA invading Canada and other countries. be aware if you are an US person living abroad.

The Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act is a U.S. law effective July 1, 2014. FATCA will force all financial institutions in the world to report to the IRS
the account records of anyone the U.S.A. considers to be a US person.

How could I be a U.S. person?

The U.S.A. considers you to be a U.S. person if you:

* were born inside the U.S.A.

* were born outside the U.S.A. to U.S. parent(s)

* are a naturalized U.S. citizen

* hold a U.S. green card

* are a visitor to the U.S.A. and meet the substantial presence test (some Snowbirds)

You are a U.S. person even if you are also a Canadian citizen or permanent resident and have lived in Canada most of your life.


What happens if I’m married to a U.S. person?

If you have joint accounts with your U.S. person spouse, those accounts will be subject to FATCA reporting.


What information will FATCA collect?

FATCA requires all Canadian financial institutions to compile annual reports for the IRS which include the account balances of
all their U.S. person clients.

What will the U.S.A. do with the FATCA reports provided by Canadian financial institutions?

The IRS will use FATCA reports to verify the information that U.S. persons provide on their FBAR (Foreign Bank Account Report)
and other tax forms. It will then assess penalties for unreported or incorrect information. The IRS will exchange this information
with other U.S. agencies such as the NSA, FBI, CIA and DHS. The vast majority of U.S. persons living in Canada are not aware
that U.S. tax law requires them to submit these annual FBAR reports and many are not even aware that they are required to file
and pay U.S. taxes, in addition to their Canadian taxes.

For more information visit: isaacbrocksociety.ca - maplesandbox.ca - repealfatca.com

What does FATCA have to do with me if I'm not a U.S. person?

Your bank or credit union will search your accounts looking for indications that you or anyone with signing authority on your
accounts, such as your spouse, might be a U.S. person. For example, receiving funds into your account from a U.S.
source is viewed as having a ‘‘U..S.. connection’’.. You will be
required to present evidence that you are not a U.S. person.

Failure to provide this evidence could result in your account being deemed a U.S. person’s account and subject to FATCA
reporting. It might result in closure of your account.

Why should I care about FATCA if I’m not a U.S. person and have no U.S. connection?

FATCA is extremely expensive for financial institutions and the Canadian government to implement and maintain. It is likely in
violation of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (article 15) so affected Canadian citizens could launch class
action lawsuits against Canadian financial institutions and/or the Canadian government. It is foreseeable that the costs of
implementing and enforcing FATCA will be passed on to all the clients of the financial institutions and all Canadian tax payers..

Why would Canadian financial institutions and the government agree to FATCA?

FATCA will impose 30% withholding on all U.S. source income to financial institutions if they do not agree to FATCA. Canadian
banks are pressuring the government to sign an Inter-Governmental Agreement (IGA) with the U.S.A. to legitimize FATCA in Canada.

FATCA can be stopped!

Contact your MP and ask what he or she is doing to STOP FATCA!


Watch this 4 minute funny video to help you understand.

#t=24

Read about a tax compliant US dual citizen and the fines that wiped out her savings.
http://waysandmeans.house.gov/uploadedfiles/patricia_anderson_daddario.pdf

If you know any US person as described above living abroad then please let them know about FATCA.
Would you want the IRS to see EVERY banking transaction you make?
169 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Warning! USA invading Canada and other countries. be aware if you are an US person living abroad. (Original Post) riverbendviewgal Dec 2013 OP
Germany is now considering citizen based taxation for its citizens riverbendviewgal Dec 2013 #1
Does FACTA include "corporate persons"? Will we finally get to learn where all our money went? NYC_SKP Dec 2013 #2
NO riverbendviewgal Dec 2013 #4
Then it most definitely is bullshit. Fucking typical. nt NYC_SKP Dec 2013 #5
It is easier to catch minnows than big fish riverbendviewgal Dec 2013 #7
What do you mean "grab some low to middle class dual citizen's pension"? Hassin Bin Sober Dec 2013 #78
In order to qualify for the foreign earned income exclusion, Art_from_Ark Dec 2013 #83
That sounds fair, no? Hassin Bin Sober Dec 2013 #84
If an overseas American has income from the US, Art_from_Ark Dec 2013 #86
You got socked with a big Japanese tax bill? What does that matter in this discussion? Hassin Bin Sober Dec 2013 #92
No US tax bill Art_from_Ark Dec 2013 #95
Do you think US citizens should be able to avoid taxes pnwmom Dec 2013 #72
No, I only want the law applied uniformly. nt NYC_SKP Dec 2013 #73
Well then giving HUGE breaks to high income and net worth people ... Hassin Bin Sober Dec 2013 #77
I think US citizens shouldn't be liable for US taxes on non-US income if they're not US residents Spider Jerusalem Dec 2013 #94
Yes NoOneMan Dec 2013 #104
Not true Sgent Dec 2013 #87
true riverbendviewgal Dec 2013 #88
More..... MADem Dec 2013 #3
Sadly you can hear the interviews on the audio riverbendviewgal Dec 2013 #6
It isn't a video file--it's an audio one, and it works fine. MADem Dec 2013 #8
I heard it already the day it was broadcast riverbendviewgal Dec 2013 #9
I think the Canadian government approves of this, otherwise they wouldn't allow it to happen. MADem Dec 2013 #12
You guessed right. riverbendviewgal Dec 2013 #14
US citizens and green card holders owe US taxes pnwmom Dec 2013 #10
THese people are dual citizens riverbendviewgal Dec 2013 #11
Then they can make a choice. If they want the benefits of US citizenry, they can pay the taxes. nt msanthrope Dec 2013 #13
What benefits? riverbendviewgal Dec 2013 #15
If they can see no benefit, they can relinquish. If it is as bad as you describe, they msanthrope Dec 2013 #16
THey are riverbendviewgal Dec 2013 #18
Good. When we've lost all our Ambassadors, you let me know. nt msanthrope Dec 2013 #19
I will and riverbendviewgal Dec 2013 #21
On another thread, you revealed that you are getting your info on this issue from Glenn Beck. msanthrope Dec 2013 #24
I don't think you read the other thread well riverbendviewgal Dec 2013 #28
I provided you the link. Did you not realize you are using Glenn Beck's news organization? msanthrope Dec 2013 #29
No I did not riverbendviewgal Dec 2013 #34
Your source is a nobody libertarian who identifies himself as a blow-hard. pnwmom Dec 2013 #80
If they get no benefits then they should relinquish. Hassin Bin Sober Dec 2013 #30
They are renouncing in droves riverbendviewgal Dec 2013 #37
Let me explain about living overseas Art_from_Ark Dec 2013 #85
You are not telling me anything I don't know. Hassin Bin Sober Dec 2013 #91
I didn't pay any US income tax Art_from_Ark Dec 2013 #96
Ok. Hassin Bin Sober Dec 2013 #97
No, it didn't Art_from_Ark Dec 2013 #98
The OP posted some right wing clap trap about how it costs $3000 dollars to file ... Hassin Bin Sober Dec 2013 #99
I will admit Art_from_Ark Dec 2013 #100
She specifically says that is ALL prep fees and never paid the tax. Hassin Bin Sober Dec 2013 #101
If that's the case, and she's not confused, Art_from_Ark Dec 2013 #102
So you fully endorse this pain in the ass? NoOneMan Dec 2013 #105
delete dupe FourScore Dec 2013 #118
LOL! Great argument about the state taxes because it's true. FourScore Dec 2013 #124
LOL. States don't eqal countries. Nice try. Hassin Bin Sober Dec 2013 #133
The distinction is somewhat arbitrary. States are income tax zones based on residency NoOneMan Dec 2013 #141
What's that situation again? That high earners might have to pay a little US taxes on the income.. Hassin Bin Sober Dec 2013 #143
Who cares if its a little, a lot or a pain in the ass time wasting bureaucracy you ultimately fund NoOneMan Dec 2013 #144
How can they afford to do it? Glassunion Dec 2013 #22
FATCA was passed in 2010. Whoever falls under this had fair warning. I mean....if you msanthrope Dec 2013 #23
Senator Levin wants those who renounce and relinquish riverbendviewgal Dec 2013 #40
He's right..and if I were you, I'd stop using Glen Beck as a news source. nt msanthrope Dec 2013 #61
Thank you for the advice riverbendviewgal Dec 2013 #62
THis lady is not a glen beck follower riverbendviewgal Dec 2013 #64
Your Glenn Beck attack is pretty low. I thought you were better than that. n/t FourScore Dec 2013 #119
The poster used Glen Beck's news organization for her 'facts.' Take msanthrope Dec 2013 #132
You are so correct. riverbendviewgal Dec 2013 #38
The USA is one of two countries in the world that taxes on the basis of citizenship... Spider Jerusalem Dec 2013 #20
I completely agree with you. nt City Lights Dec 2013 #25
Good. I think it's a great system. nt msanthrope Dec 2013 #31
I take it you've never lived abroad, then. Spider Jerusalem Dec 2013 #33
You have a great point riverbendviewgal Dec 2013 #42
Lived in Belgium for over a year, with extensive travel through Europe, msanthrope Dec 2013 #112
Did you live on US dollars or did you actually WORK and JOIN in their society and economy? FourScore Dec 2013 #115
Given that most of my time in Africa was spent documenting refugee flight, msanthrope Dec 2013 #128
I work in the film industry. We come from different perspectives. And BTW, FourScore Dec 2013 #130
Jeebus christ...go sit sometime in a cinema in Belgium, and when the multiple msanthrope Dec 2013 #131
Its can be improved. All US citizens should file state returns for life of any state they lived in NoOneMan Dec 2013 #106
How would you propose we make things fair when these folks exercise their right to come home... Hassin Bin Sober Dec 2013 #35
this is a totally nonsensical non sequitur Spider Jerusalem Dec 2013 #39
What if they return to live permanently after, say, 10 or 20 years? Hassin Bin Sober Dec 2013 #41
No, they didn't live there so why should they be back charged? riverbendviewgal Dec 2013 #45
I suppose they will agree to never get sick and need disability, SSI, Medicaid . Hassin Bin Sober Dec 2013 #55
You got it wrong riverbendviewgal Dec 2013 #58
Maybe solarhydrocan Dec 2013 #89
Green for victory!!... SidDithers Dec 2013 #138
Anyone who lives in any other developed country and gets sick, etc... Spider Jerusalem Dec 2013 #60
This lady lived in Canada and riverbendviewgal Dec 2013 #66
Oh please, I got to the part where the little old lady disabled pensioner never paid a dime .. Hassin Bin Sober Dec 2013 #69
No, then they pay taxes as resident citizens. Spider Jerusalem Dec 2013 #51
Yeah, Eritrea ain't the world policeman. We got bills to pay. Hassin Bin Sober Dec 2013 #74
So, which is it? Spider Jerusalem Dec 2013 #75
Like the old toast goes: Hassin Bin Sober Dec 2013 #76
"ain't a bad shake" NoOneMan Dec 2013 #108
Then relinquish your citizenship and be done with it. Hassin Bin Sober Dec 2013 #134
A few reasons... NoOneMan Dec 2013 #142
"get him and his buddies to pay for your fuckn roads" Hassin Bin Sober Dec 2013 #145
"a few higher income crybabies chip in a few bucks" NoOneMan Dec 2013 #146
Nah. We'll just send you a bill. LOL Hassin Bin Sober Dec 2013 #147
And there it is. NoOneMan Dec 2013 #148
I suppose voting isn't one of the rights you choose to retain and exercise? Hassin Bin Sober Dec 2013 #149
So we're doing all this to fund counting expats ballots? NoOneMan Dec 2013 #150
Nah, just wondering how much responsibilty you take for "my" failed state. Hassin Bin Sober Dec 2013 #152
Zero NoOneMan Dec 2013 #153
I figured as much. Pay up or relinquish. Hassin Bin Sober Dec 2013 #154
Pay your own bills! NoOneMan Dec 2013 #155
I pay my bills. And your parents and your kids, apparently. Hassin Bin Sober Dec 2013 #157
My parents live in the states and pay their own bills NoOneMan Dec 2013 #158
spoken like a true RWer... dionysus Dec 2013 #164
A right winger wouldn't be happy paying a much higher tax rate for universal health care... NoOneMan Dec 2013 #165
then renounce already. dionysus Dec 2013 #166
Mmmmm, yeah NoOneMan Dec 2013 #167
you're right, i don't give a fuck about ones who tax dodgers. now avoid your taxes at all costs. dionysus Dec 2013 #168
As a resident of a civilized country, I pay more tax than you. I do so gladly. NoOneMan Dec 2013 #169
The point is they will not exercise that right riverbendviewgal Dec 2013 #43
Then relinquish the citisenship and be done with it. Hassin Bin Sober Dec 2013 #151
The same way the rest of the world does it NoOneMan Dec 2013 #107
They're tax evaders if they're US citizens/green card holders and pnwmom Dec 2013 #71
Here is comments on blog from New Zealand riverbendviewgal Dec 2013 #17
I am so sorry. There is something really weird going on here in the US. We are no longer a liberal_at_heart Dec 2013 #26
Read this essay riverbendviewgal Dec 2013 #27
Here's a clue for the New Zealnd couple: Hassin Bin Sober Dec 2013 #48
They don't want a social Security number for their daughter riverbendviewgal Dec 2013 #52
I'm gonna go ahead and call bullshit, mmkay? Hassin Bin Sober Dec 2013 #63
You love to call bullshit on arguments that don't fit into your world view. Hmm...where did I read FourScore Dec 2013 #116
You are the one posting made up anti-tax teabagger fables. Hassin Bin Sober Dec 2013 #137
Huh? What are you talking about? What testimony? n/t FourScore Dec 2013 #163
The child of one US citizen parent born abroad is considered a US citizen by the US government. Spider Jerusalem Dec 2013 #57
Billionaires thank you for your efforts to protect their tax havens. (nt) jeff47 Dec 2013 #32
You are so wrong riverbendviewgal Dec 2013 #36
Yeah, that's why two major tax havens just agreed to this law. jeff47 Dec 2013 #47
They must have agreed to do it treestar Dec 2013 #44
read this and the bold letters on the end. riverbendviewgal Dec 2013 #46
FATCA written by FATCATS seveneyes Dec 2013 #49
very true. riverbendviewgal Dec 2013 #53
Non fatcats can exempt all their income up to $97k and use Turbo Tax. Hassin Bin Sober Dec 2013 #65
No that is not true riverbendviewgal Dec 2013 #67
Here, let me look it up for you. Hassin Bin Sober Dec 2013 #68
I think there is more to it than jealousy, riverbendviewgal. FourScore Dec 2013 #125
The very purpose of these laws is to tax off shore millionaires and their hidden assets. Hassin Bin Sober Dec 2013 #135
Its about time we took their Beer wells for our own!!! JoePhilly Dec 2013 #50
That is the intention riverbendviewgal Dec 2013 #54
I'm too afraid that the NSA would see me watch it and then JoePhilly Dec 2013 #56
???????????? riverbendviewgal Dec 2013 #59
I agree with one thing DonCoquixote Dec 2013 #70
I believe Ted Cruz never paid Canadian taxes riverbendviewgal Dec 2013 #79
No bankruptcies from medical bills - only partially true OnlinePoker Dec 2013 #81
Can I tell you something riverbendviewgal Dec 2013 #82
Oh riverbendviewgal! What an unbelievable story! FourScore Dec 2013 #126
FourScore riverbendviewgal Dec 2013 #159
My dear, dear riverbendviewgal, FourScore Dec 2013 #162
replies DonCoquixote Dec 2013 #90
Resident based taxation riverbendviewgal Dec 2013 #93
the times they are a changin DonCoquixote Dec 2013 #103
Interesting way to put it. RAFREE Dec 2013 #140
Whenever this subject comes up--even on the most liberal sites--the grouchy get-off-my-porchers show NoOneMan Dec 2013 #109
Just the FACTS as far as I have seen them here. RAFREE Dec 2013 #110
Border babies laundry_queen Dec 2013 #111
Sorry to say RAFREE Dec 2013 #113
Most Democrats in Congress supported this law. Most Republicans in Congress opposed it Freddie Stubbs Dec 2013 #114
Too bad RAFREE Dec 2013 #117
This is by far the best and most reasoned response in this entire thread. FourScore Dec 2013 #120
Thank you for seeing the message. riverbendviewgal Dec 2013 #122
Welcome to DU. RAFREE riverbendviewgal Dec 2013 #121
Thanks RAFREE Dec 2013 #123
YES!! Welcome (or welcome back) to DU! FourScore Dec 2013 #127
I'm trying to figure out what your beef is with the law. Hassin Bin Sober Dec 2013 #136
It's difficult if RAFREE Dec 2013 #156
I'm a British Citizen and US green card holder Boudica the Lyoness Dec 2013 #129
Green card holder RAFREE Dec 2013 #139
Thanks for all this info and posting about this. Boudica the Lyoness Dec 2013 #160
You very welcome. RAFREE Dec 2013 #161
 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
2. Does FACTA include "corporate persons"? Will we finally get to learn where all our money went?
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 12:56 PM
Dec 2013

If so, it might not be so bad.

riverbendviewgal

(4,252 posts)
7. It is easier to catch minnows than big fish
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 01:07 PM
Dec 2013

It is easier to grab some low to middle class dual citizen's pension than the rich who live abroad.

Read this letter. sent to the USA ways and means
http://waysandmeans.house.gov/uploadedfiles/patricia_anderson_daddario.pdf

Hassin Bin Sober

(26,328 posts)
78. What do you mean "grab some low to middle class dual citizen's pension"?
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 05:43 PM
Dec 2013

You wouldn't mean to imply this low income person would have their pension "grabbed", would you? How?

Those low income people can avail themselves of the generous $97,500 foreign earned US income tax exemption. Those people pay ZERO US income taxes.

Art_from_Ark

(27,247 posts)
83. In order to qualify for the foreign earned income exclusion,
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 07:48 PM
Dec 2013

you have to be a legal resident of the country where you're working, and meet certain other requirements. In most cases, the people who qualify for the exclusion are paying income taxes in their country of residence. Also, if you're not a legal resident of a foreign country for a full year, then your exclusion is pro-rated for the time you spent in that country.

Hassin Bin Sober

(26,328 posts)
84. That sounds fair, no?
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 09:11 PM
Dec 2013

The point is, the vast majority are not paying any additional US income tax on top of the taxes they pay in their resident country.

Art_from_Ark

(27,247 posts)
86. If an overseas American has income from the US,
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 09:43 PM
Dec 2013

then that income is fully taxable.

In 1st world countries, at least, income tax rates are usually comparable to, or even higher than, US rates. Here in Japan, I am making just enough to squeak by right now, and I got socked with a big Japanese tax bill this year, even though my income was lower than last year.

Hassin Bin Sober

(26,328 posts)
92. You got socked with a big Japanese tax bill? What does that matter in this discussion?
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 11:12 PM
Dec 2013

How big was the US tax bill on your Japanese income? That is the issue here.

Art_from_Ark

(27,247 posts)
95. No US tax bill
Tue Dec 3, 2013, 12:30 AM
Dec 2013

Why should there be? My income was well below the exclusion limit, and all my money came from Japanese sources.

pnwmom

(108,978 posts)
72. Do you think US citizens should be able to avoid taxes
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 05:03 PM
Dec 2013

by moving to another country, while retaining US citizenship?

Hassin Bin Sober

(26,328 posts)
77. Well then giving HUGE breaks to high income and net worth people ...
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 05:40 PM
Dec 2013

.... under the guise of correcting a problem that doesn't exist for the VAST MAJORITY of foreign filers ain't gonna even things out. Quite the opposite. Kinda like the "death tax", eh?

 

Spider Jerusalem

(21,786 posts)
94. I think US citizens shouldn't be liable for US taxes on non-US income if they're not US residents
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 11:16 PM
Dec 2013

which is what every other country does.

 

NoOneMan

(4,795 posts)
104. Yes
Tue Dec 3, 2013, 03:47 AM
Dec 2013

Any human in any country should pay only the applicable taxes to the region that they are a bonafide resident in.

If you are not using Spanish roads, German education, British Social Security, French healthcare, you should not be liable to support any of those systems. Those countries are sane enough to understand that.

Sgent

(5,857 posts)
87. Not true
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 09:50 PM
Dec 2013

If a US person is a signatory on a bank account or is an officer of the corp then the info will be reported.

riverbendviewgal

(4,252 posts)
6. Sadly you can hear the interviews on the audio
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 01:03 PM
Dec 2013

as it does not work.

THe video does that shows you how to create a financial FATCA report that a specialize expensive tax account would do.

The audio interview was so much better , with an actual dual citizen, and two lawyeres

Wish you could have heard it when I did.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
8. It isn't a video file--it's an audio one, and it works fine.
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 01:10 PM
Dec 2013

Click on it and then play it. It's about 21 minutes, total. The FATCA story is the first one up.

When you click on the link in the link, it brings you here:

http://www.cbc.ca/thecurrent/popupaudio.html?clipIds=2417543073

Maybe that will help...

riverbendviewgal

(4,252 posts)
9. I heard it already the day it was broadcast
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 01:27 PM
Dec 2013

and so did many other alarmed Canadians.
what do you think?

MADem

(135,425 posts)
12. I think the Canadian government approves of this, otherwise they wouldn't allow it to happen.
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 01:37 PM
Dec 2013

I think some people might be giving up their dual citizenship as a consequence of it, as well.

I am guessing that Canada (the government of) isn't doing this out of the goodness of their hearts, to be good "pals" to their southern neighbors. They're interested in this for their own revenue-generating purposes.

riverbendviewgal

(4,252 posts)
14. You guessed right.
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 01:40 PM
Dec 2013

so far the IGA is not signed...

Canadians do not just give up....we are fighting this.

riverbendviewgal

(4,252 posts)
11. THese people are dual citizens
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 01:36 PM
Dec 2013

and live for decades in the country where they reside.
They are not tax evaders.

DId you read the whole post.. I don't think so .


Well, if this happens than I can forsee China coming in and taking over the the world banks...The USA just paved the way with FATCA

riverbendviewgal

(4,252 posts)
15. What benefits?
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 01:44 PM
Dec 2013

There is no benefits other than a US passport and filing very expensive tax returns that cost over thousands of dollars A YEAR

Many are now renouncing and relingquishing....One can relinquish if they became a dual deacades ago other wise it cost $450 exit tax plus iling 3 years of tax returns and FBURs reporting what was in all you bank accounts for 6 years.

The renouncements are going sky high now...USA is losing its Ambassadors, small businesses. Americans can not get bank accounts in some countries. now.

Can any of these americans abroad get Obamacare, any other benefirts. what benefits?

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
16. If they can see no benefit, they can relinquish. If it is as bad as you describe, they
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 01:48 PM
Dec 2013

will not regret it.

riverbendviewgal

(4,252 posts)
18. THey are
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 01:54 PM
Dec 2013

in the thousands and thousands.

The USA is going to be losing all its Ambassadors...do you think they will say kind words about the USA...

But don't be so assured because China will do this to the USA...if FATCA does this to the rest of the world. Soon China will be the most powerful country in the world. and who knows, maybe the world will give up the US dollar as world currency.

riverbendviewgal

(4,252 posts)
21. I will and
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 02:03 PM
Dec 2013

Happy baking..


but you never answered me....what benefits do these APs who live abroad for decades or all their life get...can you name these benefits?

riverbendviewgal

(4,252 posts)
28. I don't think you read the other thread well
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 03:07 PM
Dec 2013

I NEVER said I got my information from Beck. I dispise him as much as I dispise Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity and Sarah Palin and O'Reilly and most of all Dick Cheney.

Can you show in that thread where I said I got my information from Glen Beck?

The thread may advertise Glen Beck but I am pointing out the Flawed and bad FATCA Bill.

It is like RAW Story advertising stories for NEWS MAX a rightwing news ...YUK..

I am definitely not a GLenn Beck gal but my racist brother in NJ is a big fan and would love to see Hannity as US president. . We have terminated ties. I lived through the civil rights era, and viet nam....I was smart enough to read...my mother said I was weird because I read. I avoided losing money in the bank fail and mortgage fail...I removed my savings out of US stocks, mutual funds and watched everyone else lose their shirt. I saw the writing on the wall. because I read.

I loved OBAMA and love what he is doing for the health care of the people of the USA.

How he started FATCA, which is not thought through very well. ...It will really harm the USA in the long run.

http://www.amazon.ca/FATCA-New-Birth-American-Empire-ebook/dp/B00GVFLO3U/

FATCA, the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act, is a lot more important than you think it is. The IRS website says that it “targets tax non-compliance by U.S. taxpayers with foreign accounts” and that it does so through reporting by taxpayers and “foreign financial institutions”. It certainly does that, but it also does a lot more. FATCA causes problems for everybody. No matter how politely it is worded, it is an attempt to force everyone in the world to obey American laws. It seeks to use foreign businesses as a tool to force compliance with the will of the United States Internal Revenue Service based in Washington, DC.

FATCA is a terrible law, and it should be repealed. This essay is an attempt to explain it and why it represents a new era. It also shows that FATCA is imperialist, racist, and protectionist. It has the potential to irreparably harm the international perception of the United States in ways that will make Iraq and the NSA scandals look tame. If it is implemented in 2014 and 2015, it may even tip the world economy back into recession. FATCA also represents yet another step away from the principles of autonomy and representative government that initially made the United States great. This essay makes a persuasive case for the repeal of the law.

riverbendviewgal

(4,252 posts)
34. No I did not
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 03:20 PM
Dec 2013

I read the message....and what he said is true EVERYTHING!!!

PAUL CHAMBRES
Paul Chambres is a European Union Affairs Advisor based principally out of Paris, France. For the past two decades, he has helped North American businesses develop and implement strategies for investing and expanding operations in Europe. After growing up in North Carolina, Paul completed his undergraduate and graduate degrees in the United Kingdom. As a consultant, he worked extensively in Eastern Europe as the region transitioned to free market economies, before shifting focus to Western European markets. Paul is also a husband, father and die-hard conservative. He enjoys writing and blogging and has contributed to major publications in the United Kingdom and United States.

Did you notice at the end of the report; TheBlaze contributor channel supports an open discourse on a range of views. The opinions expressed in this channel are solely those of each individual author.
COMMENTS; Which I agree with except that Obamacare is a disaster...I hope not but FATCA is going to destroy the world and the USA. read the links the commenter writes of.

Nervous InvestorDec. 2, 2013 at 11:50am
Thank God ! At last there is a report (with some understanding of what FATCA is about) on this outrage that is about to be foist on the entire world as extra territorial legislation from the USA. PLEASE go and read the multitude of articles on the isaacbrocksociety.ca blog and at Jaes Jattras’ StopFatca.com for facts on this issue.

If you think that Obamacare has been a disaster then you aint seen nothing yet. FATCA is set to gut the US economy over the coming decade …. it will cause Americans to be more isolated around the world, it will result in fewer tourists visiting the US, it will result in people and business worldwide starting to avoid the US when seeking stuff to buy, intellectual property or even investment. FATCA will cause higher banking and related costs on everyone worldwide including the poorest people in countries like India. Some people in the US are starting to wake up .. the Banking Associations of Florida and Texas realize that if they need to start reporting to other countries about accounts held in the US by citizens of those other countries then …. whoops …. bye bye deposits, sell down wall street, sell out real estate ….. move those investments to somewhere that has a little more respect for the people … some people estimate that foreign investment in the US is somewhere around $25 TRILLION …. what a fire sale that will make …


pnwmom

(108,978 posts)
80. Your source is a nobody libertarian who identifies himself as a blow-hard.
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 06:01 PM
Dec 2013

He's at exactly the same level as Glenn Beck, except with a youtube site instead of a national radio show.

In other words, he has zero credibility.


http://www.amazon.com/Robert-Morris/e/B006DS0Q2U/ref=ntt_athr_dp_pel_1

Robert Morris is the commentator no one asked for. He was raised in the NYC suburbs, educated in Ann Arbor, MI and Washington, DC, and is currently lawyering in Istanbul, Turkey. After years of forcing his opinions on people with unwanted emails and Facebook comments, he has decided to start bloviating in longer form. If you buy his pamphlets he will most likely make more. He posts related videos at the More Freedom Foundation

Hassin Bin Sober

(26,328 posts)
30. If they get no benefits then they should relinquish.
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 03:13 PM
Dec 2013

If they remain citizens then they have to pay the freight.

When I'm not living in or using my house I still have to pay for upkeep, insurance and taxes. So when I go home the place won't be a burned out mess and the vital services will still be available.

When and if they return they will, from day one, be eligible countless services that we may or may not utilize. They'll be able to enroll their kids in public schools, use police and fire services, collect disability if they suffer catastrophic illness/injury, their kids can get SSI etc. etc.

The benefits of being a US citizen aren't based on al la cart pay what you use.

Besides, I think you are WAYYY over hyping the inconvenience/cost of filing an abroad tax return. Thousands? Really? I have friends who have been doing for years.

Not to mention the generous foreign earned income deduction you get before you start paying US income taxes on foreign earned money.

It appears you have been reading too much Glen Beck.

Art_from_Ark

(27,247 posts)
85. Let me explain about living overseas
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 09:36 PM
Dec 2013

Living overseas, I impose no burden on the USA. I am not freight. I pay $100+ to the US government for a 10-year passport. When I go back for a visit, I pay big bucks in use taxes just to get into the country. And that's not including the money that I am paying to an American airline to take me back. If I bring in durable goods that are over a certain value ($100 for non-residents), I have to pay customs tax on that. After I leave my hometown airport, I help to pay for the road I take home through gasoline taxes. While I am in the US, I buy as much as I can to fill a suitcase (which used to be 2 suitcases until the airlines started imposing a ridiculous $100 per second bag surcharge). I spend most of that money at local businesses, and on top of that I pay 4.5% sales tax on food items, 9% sales tax on non-food items, and 14% if I buy any alcohol or stay at a motel. All those taxes (except, perhaps, for motels) are used in my home state, county and town.

If I had kids, took them back to my home state, and enrolled them in public schools there, I would be paying for their education indirectly through property tax. And in Arkansas, even a rented apartment and junker car are subject to property tax. Fire and police protection are provided by the city I am in, not the federal government. Assuming that I would be employed upon my return to the States, my local income and property taxes would help to pay for those services. If I get a catastrophic illness while in the US, I *might* be able to collect disability, but I have paid into that system. If I have not paid into the system, I would not be able to receive disability.

Hassin Bin Sober

(26,328 posts)
91. You are not telling me anything I don't know.
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 11:09 PM
Dec 2013

How much US income tax did you pay on your overseas earnings last year?

Art_from_Ark

(27,247 posts)
96. I didn't pay any US income tax
Tue Dec 3, 2013, 12:35 AM
Dec 2013

All my income was generated in the country of my residence, and it was well below the exclusion limit. It has been like that for years.

Hassin Bin Sober

(26,328 posts)
97. Ok.
Tue Dec 3, 2013, 01:07 AM
Dec 2013

What are we arguing about again?

edit: did it cost you "thousands of dollars" to file those US returns? Like the OP and his sources claim?

Art_from_Ark

(27,247 posts)
98. No, it didn't
Tue Dec 3, 2013, 01:17 AM
Dec 2013

Most years, it has just cost me time to gather up all the materials, and postage to mail the return (I also have to mail a statement of foreign bank accounts separately to Treasury). I haven't used an accountant, but the last time I asked, the fee to have the return processed by a hometown accountant would have been around $200. It's probably safer to have an accountant handle the return if it's complicated.

Hassin Bin Sober

(26,328 posts)
99. The OP posted some right wing clap trap about how it costs $3000 dollars to file ...
Tue Dec 3, 2013, 01:33 AM
Dec 2013

... those returns.

In addition to some right wing clap trap congressional testimony about some poor Canadian pensioner who never had to pay the income tax piece but spent $42k for tax preparation over 25 years (that's $2500/year).

My bottom line is, like Joe The Plumber's baby fit about the $250k tax increase, the vast majority of filers won't pay a dime extra.

Yet we have an OP about how poor little old ladies on a pension are having their pensions taken away. Or poor old disabled pensioners who have a strange interest in complex trade and foreign investment issues testifying before congress..

Art_from_Ark

(27,247 posts)
100. I will admit
Tue Dec 3, 2013, 01:46 AM
Dec 2013

that $42K for tax preparation over 25 years ($1680/year) sounds very strange. Really, if the income is consistently that low and the sources are not complicated, it shouldn't cost anywhere near that to file a return. The only thing I can think of is that maybe there was some sort of windfall that occurred one or more times, especially a windfall from a US source, that resulted in a much higher than normal income for the year/s in question and thus a high tax bill.

Art_from_Ark

(27,247 posts)
102. If that's the case, and she's not confused,
Tue Dec 3, 2013, 02:16 AM
Dec 2013

then, based on my own experiences, I would take that claim with a very large grain of salt. Either that, or someone was ripping her off left and right.

 

NoOneMan

(4,795 posts)
105. So you fully endorse this pain in the ass?
Tue Dec 3, 2013, 03:58 AM
Dec 2013

I may very likely reach above the exclusion problem next year (I've had worse problems).

But I'm stunned by your apparent lack of empathy here for people who have to deal with this mess.

Do you endorse the idea of all Americans filing a state tax return for the state they were born in, regardless of where they live, for life, even if it costs them nothing? What worthless bureaucracy you endorse.

I wonder what it costs America to examine these foreign accounts and go through all the little guys returns. Fuck it. Its on your dime, not mine.

FourScore

(9,704 posts)
124. LOL! Great argument about the state taxes because it's true.
Tue Dec 3, 2013, 01:36 PM
Dec 2013

In fact, using Hassin bin Sober's logic, every American should pay taxes for all 50 states because even though they don't reside there, they might someday!

Hassin Bin Sober

(26,328 posts)
133. LOL. States don't eqal countries. Nice try.
Tue Dec 3, 2013, 03:02 PM
Dec 2013

So you are pulling a Joe The Plumber argument and don't pay the tax. OK.

 

NoOneMan

(4,795 posts)
141. The distinction is somewhat arbitrary. States are income tax zones based on residency
Tue Dec 3, 2013, 04:07 PM
Dec 2013

Just like most countries are as well.

You just don't like to think of the notion of paying taxes in the state you were born in if you don't live there. It pisses you off. So you reject the parallel outright.

This is the precise situation expats face.

Hassin Bin Sober

(26,328 posts)
143. What's that situation again? That high earners might have to pay a little US taxes on the income..
Tue Dec 3, 2013, 04:21 PM
Dec 2013

.... because, for some reason, they feel need to retain their US rights and privileges (but don't want to pay)?

Let's get down to brass tacks. The income tax doesn't affect THE VAST MAJORITY of filers.

Most of the filers it affects it will affect minimally.

Where the rubber hits the road is the Mit Romneys and UBS customers of the world and they are starting to feel the heat of disclosure of their hidden assets and income.

They are starting to squeal like stuck pigs - but when THEY squeal they pay other people to do it for them.

That's why we see little old disabled ladies on pensions testifying before a republican congress making up stories of $42,000 dollar filing fees. She can't even say with a straight face she paid any of the tax but she can make up a story of $42,000 accountant charges. oh, and the little old pensioner has her pulse on the issues affecting foreign investment and hiring (just for good measure).

 

NoOneMan

(4,795 posts)
144. Who cares if its a little, a lot or a pain in the ass time wasting bureaucracy you ultimately fund
Tue Dec 3, 2013, 04:28 PM
Dec 2013
for some reason, they feel need to retain their US rights and privileges

I thought taxes were meant to fund the functions of government, not to belong to some special club.


The income tax doesn't affect THE VAST MAJORITY of filers

The pain in the ass affects everyone.


Most of the filers it affects it will affect minimally.

Who fucking cares? You can't convince me we should do something illogical simply because its not prohibitively expensive. Its still illogical and stupid.


Where the rubber hits the road is the Mit Romneys and UBS customers of the world and they are starting to feel the heat of disclosure of their hidden assets and income

Mitt Romney isn't an expat. He lives there. He files his return. If he is cheating, figure out a way to fix it that doesn't impact hard working families living abroad.


oh, and the little old pensioner

Your distaste for this anecdote doesn't automatically make a stupid, illogical time wasting pain in the ass a good and reasonable idea.

Glassunion

(10,201 posts)
22. How can they afford to do it?
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 02:05 PM
Dec 2013

If I'm reading correctly, in order to relinquish, they will need to file for the past 3 years while also gathering 6 years of financial data. The preparation fees will amount to 10's of thousands of dollars.

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
23. FATCA was passed in 2010. Whoever falls under this had fair warning. I mean....if you
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 02:21 PM
Dec 2013

had 3 years to get your crap together, would it take you that long?

Look--my idiot brother-in-law is in Toronto--warned him about this years ago, and he laughed at me. Maybe he can go become a Canadian citizen. At least it might put a curb on his ass visiting us in America and begging for cash.

riverbendviewgal

(4,252 posts)
40. Senator Levin wants those who renounce and relinquish
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 03:28 PM
Dec 2013

to be barred from entering the USA. and yes you are right....Many I know laugh at me right now. but when the banks start closing your accounts if you don't allow them to report you to the IRS they will wake up, eh?

riverbendviewgal

(4,252 posts)
62. Thank you for the advice
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 03:59 PM
Dec 2013

you are trying to shoot the messenger instead of looking at the message.

You are very typical of Glen Beck followers.

riverbendviewgal

(4,252 posts)
38. You are so correct.
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 03:26 PM
Dec 2013

and the smiling sharks of tax consultants love FATCA.
One cannot do these on line nor can they do their tax returns themselves...so who pays?

 

Spider Jerusalem

(21,786 posts)
20. The USA is one of two countries in the world that taxes on the basis of citizenship...
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 02:00 PM
Dec 2013

rather than residence. I don't really see why anyone who doesn't live in the USA and doesn't do business in the USA should have any liability for US taxes. (It's also charming to see the view that citizenship is a privilege one should have to pay for rather than a right of birth espoused in a supposedly-liberal forum.)

 

Spider Jerusalem

(21,786 posts)
33. I take it you've never lived abroad, then.
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 03:20 PM
Dec 2013

And probably don't intend to. Otherwise you'd think differently.

riverbendviewgal

(4,252 posts)
42. You have a great point
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 03:30 PM
Dec 2013

no one who has lived abroad is aware of the world and how the rest of the 193 countries (Eritrea does not count) lives. My US brother is very proud he knows nothing about the world. Knows nothing.

FourScore

(9,704 posts)
115. Did you live on US dollars or did you actually WORK and JOIN in their society and economy?
Tue Dec 3, 2013, 12:24 PM
Dec 2013

Those are two VERY different scenarios.

Did you live with their health care? Pay their taxes? Depend on their public transportation and roads to get to work? Try to speak the language on a daily basis? Read their daily news papers and understand their current events and their political debates? Do you know their most famous rock groups and sing to their lyrics? Did you go to watch their news shows and documentaries and local television? Do you know the country's most famous actor and go see their hit movies? Did you muddle your way through the visa process and work permit process?

Anyone can travel through on US dollars, even extended travel. Not anyone can be an expat. It takes a certain will and drive.

It's absurd they should have to pay any US taxes on top of host country taxes. I know a very famous german movie director I used to work with in Berlin. He told me he had to give up his green card because of the US tax laws.

IT'S RIDICULOUS and it's double taxation!!

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
128. Given that most of my time in Africa was spent documenting refugee flight,
Tue Dec 3, 2013, 02:07 PM
Dec 2013

I spent little time on that continent getting to know rock bands. Given my rent and the amount of beer I bought in Belgium, am sure I contributed to the society and economy. I enjoyed their healthcare, paid taxes, but watched little tv, as I grew up without one.

I did go to the movies, though. Worked for an international agency, so I avoided work permit problems.

What strikes me about your post is how Eurocentric..and therefore, limiting, are your 'requirements' for culture assimilation. Watched hit movies? Ha!

FourScore

(9,704 posts)
130. I work in the film industry. We come from different perspectives. And BTW,
Tue Dec 3, 2013, 02:24 PM
Dec 2013

they make movies and music in Africa too! Still, if you were documenting refugees, I doubt there was much movie availability.

Nevertheless, I was speaking of hit movies from whatever country you were in. Those films hardly ever make it on the international market, and can be very insightful on a cultural level. So it is not like I'm suggesting you watch the latest Bond movie.

Also, I lived for 12 years in a foreign country. I know more than most about what it takes to assimilate. The point I was trying to make was that it is very different to go to a foreign country for a year on someone else's dime or with savings. When you live in the country and work in the country and pay taxes in the country, it's just very different.

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
131. Jeebus christ...go sit sometime in a cinema in Belgium, and when the multiple
Tue Dec 3, 2013, 02:43 PM
Dec 2013

subtitles drive you crazy, just remember you are learning something insightful.....or you could act like an actual person, cycle to the nearest pub (I lived over one that made honey mead,) drink 'til drunk, eat frites in the market, crash your bike, throw it in the canal, and find another pub.

I was not in Belgium to go to the movies.

 

NoOneMan

(4,795 posts)
106. Its can be improved. All US citizens should file state returns for life of any state they lived in
Tue Dec 3, 2013, 04:00 AM
Dec 2013

That would let the states have just as much visibility. What would it hurt you? Its just a little bit of extra time.

Hassin Bin Sober

(26,328 posts)
35. How would you propose we make things fair when these folks exercise their right to come home...
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 03:20 PM
Dec 2013

.... and use the bridges, roads, schools and other vital services I have been paying for?

Do we back-charge them on a per diem?

I'll be traveling abroad for a month next year. Do I get to deduct 1/12th of my taxes next year?

Do you think maybe my mortgage company and local property tax authority will let me slide for a month?

 

Spider Jerusalem

(21,786 posts)
39. this is a totally nonsensical non sequitur
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 03:26 PM
Dec 2013

if someone comes back to the USA for a short period while maintaining their primary residence abroad, then what's unfair? Do you force non-US citizens to pay tax when they visit the country? No? Same thing. Anyone visiting the US is going to pay taxes on any purchases and transactions during the length of their visit. But they'll be going back to wherever they actually live, and work.

riverbendviewgal

(4,252 posts)
45. No, they didn't live there so why should they be back charged?
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 03:33 PM
Dec 2013

They didn't own property there, eh? They didn't work in the USA, eh?

what is your reasoning? back charging??? I don't understand this logic.

Hassin Bin Sober

(26,328 posts)
55. I suppose they will agree to never get sick and need disability, SSI, Medicaid .
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 03:48 PM
Dec 2013

Or use bridges roads and schools?

The whole issue is a right wing circle jerk just like all the clowns "who earned $250K" unclogging toilets screamed about their income over $250k being taxed at a higher rate.

You get a $91k exemption (as of 2009 it is higher now, yes?).

Sounds like a pretty good deal. You can earn $91k and not have to pay the freight for Seal Team Six to rescue you from Somali pirates.

All you captains of industry and "Ambassadors" (seriously, where did that come from? Beck?) can rest easy.

riverbendviewgal

(4,252 posts)
58. You got it wrong
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 03:54 PM
Dec 2013

I am not a right wing jerk. I am a progressive liberal left to Obama.

You are being fed false information.

when one earns 91k in another country, one pays for that country they reside in income taxes to that country they live in and this supports that country's military.

Now you are sounding like your words. A rightwing circle jerk. In Canada I pay for my military. I do not want to pay for wars started on lies.

I am not a Beck fan...or ever will be. He would dispise me.

I love the new pope even though I excommunicated myself from the catholic church because of its excesses of wealth and opression of woman and attack on children.

Who are you to judge me on one article that I have mutual agreement with the writer who points out the truth. He may be looking out for the billionaires but I am not

I have become very disappointed with DU lately. You are not the same DU I started on.

solarhydrocan

(551 posts)
89. Maybe
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 10:04 PM
Dec 2013

more people will begin to understand how absurd it is to be called "Right Wing" or "Racist" to oppose a Right Wing Heritage Foundation Health insurance scam put forth by a President who says his policies would have been considered republican in the '80s



This country has gone to shite and is approaching the cliff. These money grabs will become more and more frequent because the elites in DC keep borrowing money to invade and conquer lands 8000 miles away. Blowing more than $2000 per second (that's $20,000 in the time it takes to read just this one post) has it's consequences.

I know more than a few who, like myself, are trying to get out as quickly as possible.
 

Spider Jerusalem

(21,786 posts)
60. Anyone who lives in any other developed country and gets sick, etc...
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 03:58 PM
Dec 2013

is probably better off not coming back to the USA anyway. And if they do, after moving back to the USA, so what? They'll have been paying tax on their income earned in the US while resident. Charge them if they're not legally resident, simple. (The UK NHS, for instance, is free at the point of use for UK residents; non-resident UK citizens are charged for services received.)

riverbendviewgal

(4,252 posts)
66. This lady lived in Canada and
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 04:04 PM
Dec 2013

still paid her US taxes as well as her Canadian taxes.

Please take time to read this . It is her story. to the Ways and Means departent in the USA.

http://waysandmeans.house.gov/uploadedfiles/patricia_anderson_daddario.pdf

Hassin Bin Sober

(26,328 posts)
69. Oh please, I got to the part where the little old lady disabled pensioner never paid a dime ..
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 04:53 PM
Dec 2013

....in US taxes on her foreign income yet paid $42k for tax preparation services since 1988. ($2500 year).

Then I fell out of my chair laughing at this tripe.

The little old disabled lady on a pension who earns little enough to have all her foreign income sheltered from US income but is worried about complex foreign trade and investment issues AND gets a seat in front of House Ways and Means.

This is bought and paid for hype by wealthy individuals who stand to gain A FUCKING TON from not having to report income and holdings. So they trot up some "poor slob" victim whose story doesn't stand up to the slightest cursory scrutiny.

But the little people are supposed to get all worked up so "Pam The Plumber" doesn't have to file a couple forms never mind someone else will stand to gain millions.

Yes, let's relieve Pam The Plumber of her filings and let Mitt Romney hide another couple hundred million in income and assets.

While we are at it let's do away with the repressive "Death Tax" and income tax on billionaires... erm I mean job creators

 

Spider Jerusalem

(21,786 posts)
51. No, then they pay taxes as resident citizens.
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 03:45 PM
Dec 2013

This isn't hard to figure out. Other countries do things this way. (Every other country does things this way, in fact, except Eritrea.)

Hassin Bin Sober

(26,328 posts)
74. Yeah, Eritrea ain't the world policeman. We got bills to pay.
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 05:08 PM
Dec 2013

And I don't have a problem with US citizens abroad paying a few bucks in taxes to cover their piece.

Really, how much money are we talking about here for someone earning, say, $100k abroad? They have to pay income tax on $2500 dollars after their very generous $97,500 foreign exemption? Oh boy the "job creators" ain't gonna be happy - oh wait.

Is that enough to have your have your underwear in a twist? what's the tax on $2500?

I bet it's enough to have the Mit Romneys of the world's underwear in a twist. They might even hire a "victim" to testify in front of congress.

Seems to me, paying literally a few bucks on $100k foreign income AND being able to come home to bridges roads and schools ain't a bad shake.

 

Spider Jerusalem

(21,786 posts)
75. So, which is it?
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 05:13 PM
Dec 2013

What's the justification? "Bridges, roads and schools"? Those are paid for, mostly, out of state and local taxes. Apparently your justification for taxing non-resident citizens is...maintenance of the US military.

Hassin Bin Sober

(26,328 posts)
76. Like the old toast goes:
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 05:26 PM
Dec 2013

"When I drink, everybody drinks! When I pay, everybody pays!"

I don't like paying for military anymore than the next guy but I can't carve it out and refuse to pay. I CAN move abroad and have most of my income sheltered from US taxes. So there's that.

I guess you really don't want to get down to brass tacks and discuss what THE VAST MAJORITY OF FOREIGN FILERS actually have to pony up???

 

NoOneMan

(4,795 posts)
108. "ain't a bad shake"
Tue Dec 3, 2013, 04:16 AM
Dec 2013

Until you are in the position where you have to pay for two sets of bridges, roads and schools (one set you do not ever use, nor cannot due to proximity), you are in no position to judge how much--if any at all--is a fair shake.

Remember, different regions have different rules. I've agreed to pay more in property taxes (3K a year). I've agreed to pay more in sales tax (12%). I've agreed to pay about 5-10% more in income tax than the US. I pay far more in fuel taxes (contributing to about $6 a gallon of gas). I pay over $4 a gallon for milk due to different laws. The lack of American subsidies make food items cost 10-40% more than in the US.

All of this is OK. Its what I pay to live with the bridges, roads, schools and healthcare that I want. But do not sit there and tell me I need to shell out anymore for your imploding, decaying corporatocracy because your incompetent country can't figure out how to fund its damn expenses (throw in whatever fucking excuse you want).

Us expats who went out to seek a better life for our familes are not your solution to your teabagger/corporate run failing state

Hassin Bin Sober

(26,328 posts)
134. Then relinquish your citizenship and be done with it.
Tue Dec 3, 2013, 03:07 PM
Dec 2013

"your teabagger/corporate run failing state"

I'm curious why you don't relinquish.

 

NoOneMan

(4,795 posts)
142. A few reasons...
Tue Dec 3, 2013, 04:17 PM
Dec 2013

1) Sounds like another pain in the ass. I don't like dealing with pains in the ass. You don't either. That's why you don't want to file a state return for what state you were born in. What a drag.
2) I cannot really unless I have citizenship in another country
3) Heroes Earnings Assistance and Relief Act of 2008 (expatriation tax)
4) Worried about future action regarding barring renounced expats from entry. I wish to have the same right to visit as any member of a country with a visa treaty.
5) Its a choice I don't necessarily wish to make for my children
6) There is a possibility I may at some time need to take care of ailing parents by residing there for over a 6 month window. Why make that more difficult?

etc, etc.

I don't think any of that really merits I should continually pay some fee or that the US has a right to track my assets.

Fuck your bridges and roads. If I use them, Ill pay for them. I currently use and pay for someone elses. Stop fawning over Warren Buffet and get him and his buddies to pay for your fuckn roads.

Hassin Bin Sober

(26,328 posts)
145. "get him and his buddies to pay for your fuckn roads"
Tue Dec 3, 2013, 04:29 PM
Dec 2013

That's exactly what this law does.

Along with making a few higher income crybabies chip in a few bucks to pay for the bridges and roads their kids might use some day.


boo hoo

 

NoOneMan

(4,795 posts)
146. "a few higher income crybabies chip in a few bucks"
Tue Dec 3, 2013, 04:31 PM
Dec 2013

They already pay more bucks for their own fucking roads. Get over yourself and your crumbling fucking bridges already.

Im tired of hearing you cry about your fucking underfunded bridges and wanting "others" to fund them because you fucking can't (nor can you make your corporate masters).

Sort your own shit out and then come talk to me.

 

NoOneMan

(4,795 posts)
148. And there it is.
Tue Dec 3, 2013, 04:43 PM
Dec 2013

You get your shit and giggles preying on the vulnerable to fund your own shit while you take your unique fat cat deductions that we don't get (like earned income or mortgage interest writeoff).

Its just so fucking hilarious to imagine having hard working families somewhere else pay your fucking burden while you freeload under the guise of liberalism.

What a joke.

I already pay taxes for a real progressive government. Fuck if I'm going to pay a fucking cent for the ass-backwards, imperialistic juggernaut that is flying the fake flag of liberalism these days. I'm not going to pay the freeloaders bill.

 

NoOneMan

(4,795 posts)
150. So we're doing all this to fund counting expats ballots?
Tue Dec 3, 2013, 04:57 PM
Dec 2013

I thought you wanted your bridges and roads funded. This whole mess is just about them paying for the poll workers?

Hassin Bin Sober

(26,328 posts)
152. Nah, just wondering how much responsibilty you take for "my" failed state.
Tue Dec 3, 2013, 04:59 PM
Dec 2013

Do you vote?

Do your parents?

Hassin Bin Sober

(26,328 posts)
154. I figured as much. Pay up or relinquish.
Tue Dec 3, 2013, 05:12 PM
Dec 2013

People who don't vote helped elect teabaggers. Nice job.

Though I'm trying to see the daylight between your Taxed Enough Already position and their anti-tax/government position.

You want to keep the good ole USA on ice for yourself, your kids and your presumably Medicare/SS collecting folks but god forbid you want to take any responsibility or pay a piece of the tab - THAT"S FASCISM/COMMUNISM/FAILED STATE!!!!!!!

 

NoOneMan

(4,795 posts)
155. Pay your own bills!
Tue Dec 3, 2013, 05:19 PM
Dec 2013

Exceptional US joining 3 out of 156 of the world countries.

The United States of Freeloaders.

Your politicians don't pay dick. Your elite don't pay dick. Your middle class gets all the breaks in the world. And you think you have the right to ask more heavily taxed progressive people living abroad to fund your government when they don't use it. Pay your own fuckn bills freeloaders.

 

NoOneMan

(4,795 posts)
158. My parents live in the states and pay their own bills
Tue Dec 3, 2013, 06:39 PM
Dec 2013

My children cost the US nothing, nor do I. We have no cost. There is nothing to pay (should be nothing). It would cost you more to file our renunciation paperwork. It costs you more to enforce FACTA.

The only thing you advocate is that we pay for the breaks you get and the breaks your politicians give themselves (those politicians you vote for!).

And that my friend, is a cold hearted thing to advocate. I don't have any respect for freeloaders. Sorry

 

NoOneMan

(4,795 posts)
165. A right winger wouldn't be happy paying a much higher tax rate for universal health care...
Thu Dec 5, 2013, 02:52 PM
Dec 2013

and a strong social safety net. I do gladly. Just not in your country. But I don't live there nor use those services or incur any cost to you.

People who are pro-tax in the country they live in and anti-tax in a country they don't live in aren't RWers. They are normal. 153 countries do not do this. US is an exception. This law is a rare absurdity. Being against it doesn't make you a RWer.

Living in America and wanting your specialized tax breaks, while asking families that don't live there to pay for them is asinine and selfish freeloading.

 

NoOneMan

(4,795 posts)
167. Mmmmm, yeah
Thu Dec 5, 2013, 03:03 PM
Dec 2013

See the post you labeled as "RW"...if you aren't happy with that I could give a fuck. You could clearly give a fuck about Americans who live abroad.

It'd make much more sense if the US just left expats the hell alone.

If push comes to shove, yes, I will have to pursue that path (after getting citizenship elsewhere, and ensuring the exit tax won't hit me). Yep, a de facto love it or leave it forever law

 

NoOneMan

(4,795 posts)
169. As a resident of a civilized country, I pay more tax than you. I do so gladly.
Thu Dec 5, 2013, 03:09 PM
Dec 2013

Who is really dodging what? US residents get a fuckn tax break for everything under the sun. Guess now they want expats to pay for it. Who are the real freeloading tax dodgers?

riverbendviewgal

(4,252 posts)
43. The point is they will not exercise that right
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 03:32 PM
Dec 2013

Look
I know someone who was born in Canada and has moved to England. He pays no taxes to Canada now unless he moves back. then he will start to pay taxes again. Now he pays taxes to England. That is how the 193 countries out of 195 do it.

Hassin Bin Sober

(26,328 posts)
151. Then relinquish the citisenship and be done with it.
Tue Dec 3, 2013, 04:58 PM
Dec 2013

Or don't come cryin' when the country you want to keep on ice asks you to chip in - after a very generous credit that assures you and everyone else on this thread really doesn't have to pay anything so whythefuckareyoubitchin again?

 

NoOneMan

(4,795 posts)
107. The same way the rest of the world does it
Tue Dec 3, 2013, 04:03 AM
Dec 2013

You pay where you earn income

I'll be traveling abroad for a month next year.

Will you be working abroad?

local property tax authority will let me slide for a month

Property tax is not income tax. Apples are not oranges. I paid property tax while living abroad. I didn't expect anything different. Its not the topic of this thread. Its a red herring

pnwmom

(108,978 posts)
71. They're tax evaders if they're US citizens/green card holders and
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 05:00 PM
Dec 2013

not paying US taxes.

Acquiring or retaining another citizenship is a choice that doesn't allow a person to avoid US taxes. Otherwise, it would make sense for most people to obtain a second citizenship in a country with lower taxes.

riverbendviewgal

(4,252 posts)
17. Here is comments on blog from New Zealand
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 01:50 PM
Dec 2013
http://kiwiwit.blogspot.ca/2013/11/fatca-legislation-and-agreement-is.html

My friend, a New Zealander born and bred, married a US woman and together they have a newborn baby who was born in New Zealand. Unsurprisingly, the wife, who holds both NZ and US citizenship, is considered by the US Internal Revenue Service to be a valid target for the FATCA regime. She not only has to pay tax in New Zealand, where she now lives, she has to file a US tax return and pay taxes there as well (although she gets to deduct some, but not all, of the taxes she pays on her NZ income). But here's the kicker - the IRS also considers the baby to be a US taxpayer, irrespective of whether the baby ever sets foot in the United States. My friend's child will be subject to intrusive surveillance by the IRS for the rest of her life and her bankers will be forced to hand over information to the IRS about her, against her will and contrary to her rights under other NZ laws, and all this will be abetted by the New Zealand Government that, as the writer of this blog points out, considers her to be a "US taxpayer habitually resident in New Zealand."


read more on this link. This is happening all over the world.

liberal_at_heart

(12,081 posts)
26. I am so sorry. There is something really weird going on here in the US. We are no longer a
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 02:54 PM
Dec 2013

democracy. Some might call it an oligarchy, a plutocracy, or authoritarianism, but it is definitely not a democracy anymore. If you think those who don't live here anymore are pissed, think how pissed those of us who do live here are.

riverbendviewgal

(4,252 posts)
27. Read this essay
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 02:57 PM
Dec 2013

you have to buy it ...it is just $3. on Amazon.

But you will understand. It took me about an hour to read it.
http://www.amazon.ca/FATCA-New-Birth-American-Empire-ebook/dp/B00GVFLO3U/

excerpt:
FATCA, the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act, is a lot more important than you think it is. The IRS website says that it “targets tax non-compliance by U.S. taxpayers with foreign accounts” and that it does so through reporting by taxpayers and “foreign financial institutions”. It certainly does that, but it also does a lot more. FATCA causes problems for everybody. No matter how politely it is worded, it is an attempt to force everyone in the world to obey American laws. It seeks to use foreign businesses as a tool to force compliance with the will of the United States Internal Revenue Service based in Washington, DC.

FATCA is a terrible law, and it should be repealed. This essay is an attempt to explain it and why it represents a new era. It also shows that FATCA is imperialist, racist, and protectionist. It has the potential to irreparably harm the international perception of the United States in ways that will make Iraq and the NSA scandals look tame. If it is implemented in 2014 and 2015, it may even tip the world economy back into recession. FATCA also represents yet another step away from the principles of autonomy and representative government that initially made the United States great. This essay makes a persuasive case for the repeal of the law.

Hassin Bin Sober

(26,328 posts)
48. Here's a clue for the New Zealnd couple:
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 03:39 PM
Dec 2013

Don't get your kid dual citizenship and a Social Security number.

What's that? Oh, you want your kid to be able to live and work in the States and partake in all the country has to offer.

That poor thing, she has to pay US taxes after excluding close to the first $100k income ($91k in 2009).


http://www.irs.gov/uac/Five-Facts-about-the-Foreign-Earned-Income-Exclusion

Five Facts about the Foreign Earned Income Exclusion

IRS Tax Tip 2010-57

If you are living and working abroad you may be entitled to the Foreign Earned Income Exclusion. Here are five important facts from the IRS about the exclusion:
1.The Foreign Earned Income Exclusion United States Citizens and resident aliens who live and work abroad may be able to exclude all or part of their foreign salary or wages from their income when filing their U.S. federal tax return. They may also qualify to exclude compensation for their personal services or certain foreign housing costs.


2.The General Rules To qualify for the foreign earned income exclusion, a U.S. citizen or resident alien must have a tax home in a foreign country and income received for working in a foreign country, otherwise known as foreign earned income. The taxpayer must also meet one of two tests: the bona fide residence test or the physical presence test.


3.The Exclusion Amount The foreign earned income exclusion is adjusted annually for inflation. For 2009, the maximum exclusion is up to $91,400 per qualifying person.


4.Claiming the Exclusion The foreign earned income exclusion and the foreign housing exclusion or deductions are claimed using Form 2555, Foreign Earned Income, which should be attached to the taxpayer’s Form 1040. A shorter Form 2555-EZ, Foreign Earned Income Exclusion, is available to certain taxpayers claiming only the foreign income exclusion.


5.Taking Other Credits or Deductions Once the foreign earned income exclusion is chosen, a foreign tax credit or deduction for taxes cannot be claimed on the excluded income. If a foreign tax credit or tax deduction is taken on any of the excluded income, the foreign earned income exclusion will be considered revoked.

For more information about the Foreign Earned Income Exclusion see Publication 54, Tax Guide for U.S. Citizens and Resident Aliens Abroad and the instructions for Form 2555 or Form 2555-EZ. Forms and publications are available at IRS.gov or by calling 800-TAX-FORM (800-829-3676).


Links:

riverbendviewgal

(4,252 posts)
52. They don't want a social Security number for their daughter
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 03:45 PM
Dec 2013

they do not want her to be American. the banks will connect her as a US Person using FATCA law.

and those who don't make enough to pay still have to pay the thousands to file the income return to the IRS.

There are not many US duals who make that much money that I know of in Canada. We in Canada pay a lot more in income tax than in the USA.

Look, go after the big millionaires but the little people like my friend who is living in Canada on just CANADIAN pension, even though she left the USA 50 years ago. with nothing and now has only her little house , no work pension, just Canadian old age pension. She can't afford the US income tax returns ...She has so little money like maybe 10k a year.. but she MUST file.

Hassin Bin Sober

(26,328 posts)
63. I'm gonna go ahead and call bullshit, mmkay?
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 04:00 PM
Dec 2013

How does the us know the kid exists? They don't - unless they register her and most likely get her an SS number. And/or use her as a write off if they are even paying US taxes if they earn more than $97k abroad.

Your little old lady from Canada should use Turbo Tax.

Or you can walk her through it, or better yet, do her returns for her on Turbo Tax. I do that for several friends every year.

I wonder if she would be eligible for Turbo's reduced (free?) filing for low income people. I think I used that for my dad.

Btw, when I was looking up the exemption, I saw ads for $300 filing services. A) that leads me to believe your $3000 dollar figure was BS and B) you can probably do it your self cheaper.

FourScore

(9,704 posts)
116. You love to call bullshit on arguments that don't fit into your world view. Hmm...where did I read
Tue Dec 3, 2013, 12:35 PM
Dec 2013

about something like this recently???

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024116669

Hassin Bin Sober

(26,328 posts)
137. You are the one posting made up anti-tax teabagger fables.
Tue Dec 3, 2013, 03:29 PM
Dec 2013

That testimony you posted was so transparent it was laughable.

 

Spider Jerusalem

(21,786 posts)
57. The child of one US citizen parent born abroad is considered a US citizen by the US government.
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 03:53 PM
Dec 2013

See this for instance:

A Child Born Outside the U.S. is a Citizen at Birth IF...The parents are married at the time of birth and the U.S. citizen parent had been physically present in the U.S. or its territories for a period of at least five years at some time in his or her life prior to the birth, of which at least two years were after his or her 14th birthday.

http://www.uscis.gov/us-citizenship/citizenship-through-parents


It's not a matter of "getting your kid dual citizenship".

riverbendviewgal

(4,252 posts)
36. You are so wrong
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 03:23 PM
Dec 2013

How many billionaires are there that can't afford tax consultants and lawyers to hide their assets...the people affected are regular ordinary citizens who have a little savings and pensions. but Your answer does not surprise me. The minnows are being caught...the big guys are laughing all the way to the bank.. THEY WON"T BE CAUGHT.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
47. Yeah, that's why two major tax havens just agreed to this law.
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 03:36 PM
Dec 2013


The folks pushing this as a huge problem are Glen Beck and other extremely wealthy people, because it causes major problems for their efforts to avoid taxes. Btw, it's hilarious that you're quoting "The Blaze" in your other thread and apparently don't realize just what that is.

They'd thank you for your tireless efforts to save their tax havens, but that would mean acknowledging one of the little people.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
44. They must have agreed to do it
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 03:32 PM
Dec 2013

How is the US able to "force" them?

Likely they get something in return, too.

riverbendviewgal

(4,252 posts)
46. read this and the bold letters on the end.
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 03:35 PM
Dec 2013

The Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act is a U.S. law effective July 1, 2014. FATCA will force all financial institutions in the world to report to the IRS
the account records of anyone the U.S.A. considers to be a US person.

How could I be a U.S. person?

The U.S.A. considers you to be a U.S. person if you:

* were born inside the U.S.A.

* were born outside the U.S.A. to U.S. parent(s)

* are a naturalized U.S. citizen

* hold a U.S. green card

* are a visitor to the U.S.A. and meet the substantial presence test (some Snowbirds)

You are a U.S. person even if you are also a Canadian citizen or permanent resident and have lived in Canada most of your life.


What happens if I’m married to a U.S. person?

If you have joint accounts with your U.S. person spouse, those accounts will be subject to FATCA reporting.


What information will FATCA collect?

FATCA requires all Canadian financial institutions to compile annual reports for the IRS which include the account balances of
all their U.S. person clients.

What will the U.S.A. do with the FATCA reports provided by Canadian financial institutions?

The IRS will use FATCA reports to verify the information that U.S. persons provide on their FBAR (Foreign Bank Account Report)
and other tax forms. It will then assess penalties for unreported or incorrect information. The IRS will exchange this information
with other U.S. agencies such as the NSA, FBI, CIA and DHS. The vast majority of U.S. persons living in Canada are not aware
that U.S. tax law requires them to submit these annual FBAR reports and many are not even aware that they are required to file
and pay U.S. taxes, in addition to their Canadian taxes.

For more information visit: isaacbrocksociety.ca - maplesandbox.ca - repealfatca.com

What does FATCA have to do with me if I'm not a U.S. person?

Your bank or credit union will search your accounts looking for indications that you or anyone with signing authority on your
accounts, such as your spouse, might be a U.S. person. For example, receiving funds into your account from a U.S.
source is viewed as having a ‘‘U..S.. connection’’.. You will be
required to present evidence that you are not a U.S. person.

Failure to provide this evidence could result in your account being deemed a U.S. person’s account and subject to FATCA
reporting. It might result in closure of your account.

Why should I care about FATCA if I’m not a U.S. person and have no U.S. connection?

FATCA is extremely expensive for financial institutions and the Canadian government to implement and maintain. It is likely in
violation of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (article 15) so affected Canadian citizens could launch class
action lawsuits against Canadian financial institutions and/or the Canadian government. It is foreseeable that the costs of
implementing and enforcing FATCA will be passed on to all the clients of the financial institutions and all Canadian tax payers..

Why would Canadian financial institutions and the government agree to FATCA?

FATCA will impose 30% withholding on all U.S. source income to financial institutions if they do not agree to FATCA. Canadian
banks are pressuring the government to sign an Inter-Governmental Agreement (IGA) with the U.S.A. to legitimize FATCA in Canada.


FATCA can be stopped!

Contact your MP and ask what he or she is doing to STOP FATCA!

Hassin Bin Sober

(26,328 posts)
65. Non fatcats can exempt all their income up to $97k and use Turbo Tax.
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 04:04 PM
Dec 2013

What is your beef again?



Entering Form 2555 in TurboTax

Form 2555 can be one of the most complex forms to complete when preparing your return, but don't worry! When you use TurboTax to prepare your taxes, we’ll ask you questions about your foreign earned income, figure out how much you can exclude, and fill in all the right forms for you.

If you've already gone through the step-by-step interview and want to jump directly to the entry screen for Form 2555, follow these directions:
1.Select Federal Taxes (Personal in the Home & Business edition).
In Online TurboTax, click the bars at the upper left corner to show Federal Taxes on the selection list; enlarge the screen if needed to show the left side selection list.
2.Select Wages & Income, and in the new screen, click Explore on My Own.
3.Scroll down the Your Income Summary screen until you see the Less Common Income group.
4.Click on the Start/Update button next to the Foreign Earned Income and Exclusions category.
5.Follow the prompts.

riverbendviewgal

(4,252 posts)
67. No that is not true
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 04:09 PM
Dec 2013

Turbo Tax does not cover FBURS

and the new rules is you can not file from abroad using internet.

Here are fees for doing a US tax return in Canada.
http://www.hrblock.ca/services/US_tax_pricing.asp

What I gather here and see is much, much jealousy....Americans living in America are very very jealous of those who live abroad.

I That 91 k is taxed much more in Canada than in the usA...you are jealous...and those taxes INCLUDE health care...and we have RESPs, RDSPs...and no capital gain on selling our homes. Yes! Those who want to SOCK it to those dispicable tax evaders are jealous.

Hassin Bin Sober

(26,328 posts)
68. Here, let me look it up for you.
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 04:37 PM
Dec 2013

What's your beef again? That you have to print one form and drop it in the mail?

I think your beef is with the scammers who swindled $2500 dollars a year from the little old lady disabled pensioner for tax preparation services.

Even at HR Blocks inflated costs the fees don't come anywhere close to that.

Something stinks and it ain't Thanksgiving leftovers.



https://ttlc.intuit.com/questions/1900813-form-td-f-90-22-1-report-of-foreign-bank-and-financial-accounts
Recommended answer
 TurboTax FAQ, Answering FAQ's



TurboTax Employee

 6 months ago


If you had a financial interest in (or authority over) any foreign financial accounts or holdings whose combined total value exceeded $10,000 at any time during the tax year, you are required to file Form TD F 90-22.1: Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBAR) with the Department of Treasury. The form must be received by the IRS by June 30th of the following year.

Form TD F 90-22.1 is filed separately from your tax return and is mailed to the Department of Treasury – not the IRS. This form cannot be e-filed; TurboTax will provide complete mailing instructions once you complete the form.

Here's how to complete Form TD F 90-22.1:
1.Open your tax return.
2.Click the Federal Taxes tab (Personal tab in the Home & Business version), and then click Other Tax Situations right below it.
3.At the bottom of your screen, in the Other Tax Forms section, click Start (or Update) next to Miscellaneous Tax forms.
4.Select Prepare a report on foreign bank and financial accounts and click Start (or Update).
5.Follow the on-screen instructions.


Related Information:
•How do I report foreign income?
•Form 1116, Foreign Tax Credit
•Form 2555, Foreign Earned Income Exclusion
•Form 8938, Statement of Specified Foreign Financial Assets

FourScore

(9,704 posts)
125. I think there is more to it than jealousy, riverbendviewgal.
Tue Dec 3, 2013, 01:49 PM
Dec 2013

I think they do not want Americans to experience how well social programs in foreign countries work. Most of the countries where an American could make over 97K have universal health care that works, more small business owners who are NOT part of a franchise or chain, better public transportation, publicly funded universities, and a larger middle class.

So, Congress created a law that double taxes the middle class worker while off-shore millionaires will hardly be impacted. It's brilliant, really!

Better to keep Americans dumb about the rest of the world. It makes the propaganda easier to sell. Make em pay double taxation. That'll discourage them from traveling abroad and experiencing the benefits of evil socialist programs!!!

Hassin Bin Sober

(26,328 posts)
135. The very purpose of these laws is to tax off shore millionaires and their hidden assets.
Tue Dec 3, 2013, 03:18 PM
Dec 2013

Yet the little tea-bagger-like-dupes will run around screaming bloody murder even though they don't pay a dime of the tax.

But the overseas "Joe The Plumbers" might maybe make enough to be significantly impacted some day so they feel they have the right to bitch and moan.

Maybe they do have a right to bitch and moan. But they DON'T have a right to make up stories of little old ladies having their pension "grabbed" (like the OP) or post made up stories of little old ladies paying $42k for tax prep services or tell outright bullshit about it costing $3000 for a simple individual overseas filling or tell outright bullshit that Turbo Tax doesn't process the FBAR and related filings....

I suppose they can spread that bullshit on DU but they are going to get called on it.

DonCoquixote

(13,616 posts)
70. I agree with one thing
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 04:58 PM
Dec 2013

That the rich of all sorts should be subjected to a special tax treatment, as they tend to pull up stakes whenever it suits them.

However, I do see a flaw in your complaint. If Ted Cruz, for example, who was a canadian citzen up until this year, used Canada, and paid no taxes, would that be ok with you? No. While you yourself may not think of Canada as a tax haven, and have no intentions of doing such, there are many who would, especially since the Caymans are also a British Commnwealth.

That being said, I would like nafta, faTCA, and all intrnational treaties not enforced by the UN be trashed.

riverbendviewgal

(4,252 posts)
79. I believe Ted Cruz never paid Canadian taxes
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 05:51 PM
Dec 2013

Canada is a resident based taxation country. He did not live up in Canada and he should not have to pay.
His renouncement for political reasons did offer a view of how Canada views renouncement. He paid $150 exit tax. did not have to file any tax forms and he is not considered a traitor and can be allowed back into the country.

I agree I think NAFTA , FATCA and other treaties that are not enforced should be canned.

Canada fought very hard and won in the NAFTA agreement. The USA wanted Canada to put up its health care, water (USA wanted to make it a commodity, not a human right) and banking system to be like the USA.. Canada was saved in 2008 by not having the same unregulated banking system. We have no bankruptcies either from medical bills.

And it would be nice to go back to nice 1950s, leave it to beaver time where the richest paid 90 percent taxes under President Ike.

Maybe t here would not be the problems we have today.

OnlinePoker

(5,720 posts)
81. No bankruptcies from medical bills - only partially true
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 06:11 PM
Dec 2013

This is a 2006 government study of Canadians 55 and older. 15% claimed bankruptcy for "medical reasons" but did not specify if this was non-insured medical expenses (drugs being a primary cause) or loss of income due to medical issues.

http://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/bsf-osb.nsf/vwapj/Redish-Sarra-Schabas-2006-ENG.pdf/$FILE/Redish-Sarra-Schabas-2006-ENG.pdf

riverbendviewgal

(4,252 posts)
82. Can I tell you something
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 07:43 PM
Dec 2013

My son and husband were diagnosed within 2 months with having cancer. our 24 year old son, always healthy, no warnings , had seizures at work and was getting a brain operation 3 days later. He had the same type of brain tumour as Ted Kennedy. and I looked when Kennedy was struck with his...they had pretty much the same treatments.
My son's dad, my soul mate, was diagnosed with Non Hodgkin's lymphoma. They both went to the same cancer centre in Toronto. My husband was 51 when he was diagnosed with his cancer. He had 1 operation, radiation and chemotherapy , several types with stem cell harvesting so that they would be put back on his one type of chemo, which he spent a month in hospital for. He spent 3 months in palliative care in the hospital. Our son had 3 brain operations, chemo and radiation , blood transfusions, and was in ICU for 3 weeks after his last operation and then in palliative care in the hospital for a week.
There were of course numerous lab tests, MRI, CT scans. the works.
Cost = zero.

Drugs can be expensive but many people have drug plans and also if you can't afford it the government helps. and yes loss of income can be a problem but both of my guys worked for union jobs so there was no problem..

Of course. You are right bankruptcies can occur from loss of income and that is sad.
I really believe in unions. an also private insurance to help you pay for drugs. Many people opt not to have private insurance or work for companies that do not provide benefits or have t heir own businesses. I find that people up here are not financially well when they opted to work for those kind of companies or for themselves. Of course in these times people just are not that lucky to get good paying jobs with benefits.. Corporations have become greedy.

The government can't do everything.

FourScore

(9,704 posts)
126. Oh riverbendviewgal! What an unbelievable story!
Tue Dec 3, 2013, 01:55 PM
Dec 2013

How are they now? Please tell me they are okay. My dear dear friend was diagnosed with a glioblastoma in the late 90's and has since passed away. It's so hard. I can't imagine a loved one with a Non Hodgkins diagnosis at the same time.

riverbendviewgal

(4,252 posts)
159. FourScore
Tue Dec 3, 2013, 07:31 PM
Dec 2013

Just checking this remarkable post..You are remarkable.

I am afraid that my son lasted 18 months (longer than Ted Kennedy) and died at 26 years old. (Why I am on DU to tell the young yes, you can get a horrible disease or some medical injury even if you are young.) and 18 months later his dad died at 54. Canadian health care was awesome and I was not left a bankrupt widow. The government gave me $2300 for each of them toward funeral costs. There were no medical bills for me to pay.

My son died in 1999 and my husband in 2001. I miss them every day. I don't sob anymore,,just quietly in my heart

FourScore

(9,704 posts)
162. My dear, dear riverbendviewgal,
Thu Dec 5, 2013, 02:18 PM
Dec 2013

You are the remarkable one. Both were too young to die...

My heart breaks for you.



DonCoquixote

(13,616 posts)
90. replies
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 10:48 PM
Dec 2013

"Canada is a resident based taxation country."

And therein lies a problem that is going to be bigger than just North America itself. In the old days, people would assume that if youlived somewhere, that is where you were an offical resident of. Yes, Karl Marx was a German, but he lived for many years in London. However, the rich, be they American, Canadian, or even Chinese rich do nto play by the same rules anymore. The rich are beign allowed to make self sustaining empires where they know they can buy the local police off, and run the rest. As I said, Canada is ripe for this, as the Caymans are just another jewel in the Queen's crown, so it is enitrely possible for any rich creep, and I do mean ANY rich creep, to spend a weekend in London, make their money in the US and Canada, raping both sides of the border, and keep sitting pretty with their Cayman bank account.

You can brag about Nafta, although do realize, the same people that won that round lost when Harper was allowed to stay, and if that Keystone pipeline goes through, they will buy many many voices.

That beign said, I look forward to the day when the UN settles trade trwaties, although it will have to be a less courrupt UN than we have now.

riverbendviewgal

(4,252 posts)
93. Resident based taxation
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 11:13 PM
Dec 2013

does not cover just living in a country. Resident based taxation is when you are a citizen or permanent resident. As a citizen you can move to another country for work, school or love. You pay the taxes of that country. You certainly need to get the approval of that country. You may not get it You don't pay taxes to your citizen country. You pay taxes only to where you live. The USA and Eritrea are citizen based taxation. You pay taxes to them and the country where you are living.

Perhaps in some countries one can buy their way into a country but it does not work that way in Canada.


Apparently the Cayman Islands signed onto FATCA...

DonCoquixote

(13,616 posts)
103. the times they are a changin
Tue Dec 3, 2013, 03:18 AM
Dec 2013

"Perhaps in some countries one can buy their way into a country but it does not work that way in Canada."

http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2007-05-02/india/27882892_1_citizenship-investment-schemes

Do not forget, those that would buy citizenship are not the poor leftist who want to avoid the GOP, they will be people who have money to burn,

RAFREE

(34 posts)
140. Interesting way to put it.
Tue Dec 3, 2013, 03:56 PM
Dec 2013

Yes, it's interesting isn't it?

I'm very glad Ted Cruz chose the U.S. over Canada frankly. lol

Canada doesn't ask people who don't live here to file paperwork or pay taxes where they don't live and if someone chooses to live somewhere else they file a final form saying "I don't live here right now" and that's it.

If they return they are welcomed home, if they choose to take other citizenship and give up Canadian citizenship Canadians are generally okay with that too.

There is a very different cultural mind set when it comes to these issues in the U.S. and that's perfectly fine. What's not fine is for the U.S. to assume the rest of the world should go to their way of doing things or addressing this issue when their way is not the "international norm"

 

NoOneMan

(4,795 posts)
109. Whenever this subject comes up--even on the most liberal sites--the grouchy get-off-my-porchers show
Tue Dec 3, 2013, 04:31 AM
Dec 2013

No matter how logically you lay it out, just know: it isn't that they don't get it, they just don't give a fuck.

I'm pretty sure people want you to hassle because a variety of:

1) You got out while they are stuck in their spot
2) You aren't supposed to leave your spot in the bestest country in the world so its fun to punish you
3) They can't make rich people pay their taxes, so it sure is fun as shit to force someone to
4) Its awesome to know they get their loopholes, mortgage write-offs, and that good shit on the backs of people who don't live there. Its fucking hilarious!
5) They just don't give a fuck. Who needs a reason not to care.
6) USA. Fuck yeah. Does the US need to explain itself?
7) Its not them doing the work or paying the money, so again, who cares.

I think there is a real malevolent drive behind people who cannot empathize with expats who live under these ridiculous rules. There is something strange about people being so insensitive and unsympathetic to hard working people caught in a bureaucratic nightmare, while hiding behind a liberal guise.

Until I see them this giddy about fixing the US so that it can fund itself internally, I got to take this shit with a grain of salt. You got 1%ers paying 15% tax and you want to go after people living normal lives somewhere else? Get the fuck out here...

RAFREE

(34 posts)
110. Just the FACTS as far as I have seen them here.
Tue Dec 3, 2013, 09:18 AM
Dec 2013

I do find that sad but, I don't blame them. This issue has not been as discussed in the U.S. as it has been in other nations who are negatively impacted. I know Patricia. House Ways and Means asked for submissions when they heard the "unintended consequences" of FATCA. She's not the only one who I know of that has been harmed by this. Did they REALLY think this was going to harm the 1 percent? She sent in a letter the same as hundreds of others did. ACA presented the submissions and you could write the situation online to begin with. House Ways and Means did not require you to have an "in" in order to participate. Patricia is very ill and has been horribly damaged by what happened to her. Her foreign spouse was so outraged that they had marriage issues over this. He's never been American and was put through the wringer too.

Just this week I talked with a 77 year old man who came to Canada with his Canadian parents when he was two months old. The U.S. didn't used to allow dual and he never knew he was "American" He heard about FATCA on this radio show.
[link:http://www.cbc.ca/thecurrent/episode/2013/11/13/fatca-under-fire-from-tax-experts-canadian-citizens/|

It's cost him over 20,000 dollars to straighten this all out. He's going to Toronto to renounce this year.

Got another letter yesterday from a man who is taking his 90 year old mother to renounce over it in the next two weeks. She's paid over 4000.00 to straighten it out. NOT ONE OF THESE PEOPLE ARE RICH.

There are many "accidental Americans" along the border, border babies, people who left a long time ago and were told when they took other citizenship that they were "no longer American" who have been reclaimed since 1986 and now have to pay to renounce and in order to do that you have to pay big bucks to file tons of forms which most of these people can little afford.

Then you have the spouses and children of U.S. persons who can't bank normally where they live because there is a U.S. person in the household.

The Canadian Civil Liberties association has spoken out about this issue as well as the Canadian Green Party, NDP, Liberal Party Leaders and other organizations who have met with those most horribly impacted.
[link:http://www.greenparty.ca/statement/2013-01-28/backgrounder-canada-and-fatca|
[link:http://ccla.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/2012-12-04-Letter-to-Dpt-of-Finance.pdf|

Ted Hsu my liberal party member submitted the following.

Q-1212 — October 25, 2013 — Mr. Hsu (Kingston and the Islands) — With regard to the implementation of the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA): (a) what steps has Canada undertaken to complete an Inter-Governmental Agreement (IGA) with the United States; (b) with what type of legal instrument will the government enact a FATCA implementation agreement; (c) will the government bring an IGA before Parliament and, if so, in what form; (d) what steps are in place to ensure parliamentary review of an IGA; (e) what studies have been undertaken as to whether an IGA can be implemented as an interpretation of the existing double tax treaty; (f) in what ways will the government involve Parliament in any process to amend interpretation of the double taxation treaty; (g) who is involved in the process indicated in (a); (h) by what criteria is the government evaluating any proposed IGA with the US; (i) who established the criteria in (h), (i) on what date, (ii) under what authority; (j) is a draft IGA currently being negotiated, and if so, what is the status of said negotiations; (k) when will the draft IGA be made public; (l) will the public be consulted for input on any agreement, and if so, by what means; (m) with which specific individuals and groups did the Minister of National Revenue consult regarding FATCA, and on what dates; (n) with which specific individuals and groups did the Minister of National Revenue consult regarding any IGA, and on what dates; (o) with which specific individuals and groups did the Minister of Finance consult regarding FATCA, and on what dates; (p) with which specific individuals and groups did the Minister of Finance consult regarding any IGA, and on what dates; (q) what studies and analyses has the Department of Finance undertaken with respect to FATCA; (r) what studies and analyses has the Department of National Revenue undertaken with respect to FATCA; (s) what analyses and studies have been undertaken as to whether the proposed FATCA regime constitutes an override of the existing double tax convention; (t) what were the conclusions of the studies in (s); (u) what steps is the government taking to ensure that, as a result of FATCA or an IGA, the US will not be allowed to impose higher taxes on Canadian persons than those agreed under the current convention; (v) what studies and analyses have been undertaken to determine whether Canadian citizens and residents are or will be denied financial services in Canada owing to US tax law in general and FATCA in particular; (w) what are the conclusions or recommendations of the studies in (v); (x) what mechanisms are in place to ensure that Canadian citizens and residents are not and will not be denied financial services in Canada owing to US tax law in general and FATCA in particular; (y) what measures will be taken to remedy denial of services to Canadians as a result of FATCA; (z) what studies and analyses will be undertaken to assess FATCA’s impact on the availability of TFSAs and RESPs for dual US-Canada citizens; (aa) what are the conclusions of any studies in (z); (bb) what analyses and studies have been undertaken regarding whether the US definition of “resident” for tax purposes, and its impact on Canadians with dual status, is compatible with Canadian law, including the Charter of Rights and freedoms; (cc) what analyses and studies have been undertaken regarding whether the US definition of “resident” for tax purposes, and its impact on Canadians with dual status, as will be enforced by FATCA or by an IGA, is compatible with Canadian law and, in particular, the Charter of Rights and Freedoms; (dd) what analyses and studies have been conducted with respect to FATCA's consequences upon Canadians who believed their US Citizenship had been relinquished; (ee) with respect to the studies referenced in (dd), what particular efforts has the government undertaken to ensure no violation of a Canadian's charter right would be occasioned by implementing FATCA or an IGA; (ff) what studies and analyses have been undertaken regarding the likely cost of FATCA implementation to (i) Canadian private institutions, (ii) Canadian individuals, (iii) the government; (gg) how were the figures in (ff) arrived at, by whom, when, and in consultation with whom; (hh) what studies and analyses have been undertaken as to whether the likely cost of FATCA implementation to Canadian private institutions, Canadian individuals, and the government will be offset by the receipt of reciprocal tax information and Canadian tax law enforcement by the US; (ii) what analyses and studies have been undertaken as to whether the likely costs and benefits described in (ff) and (hh) are likely to be greater, lesser, or the same as under the current tax-information-sharing relationship with the US; (jj) what agencies, boards, tribunals, or commissions of the government have studied, interpreted, analyzed, or commented upon FATCA, (i) to what extent, (ii) on what dates, (iii) with what conclusion(s); (kk) what specific steps has the government taken to assess the privacy implications of FACTA; (ll) on what dates and with respect to what topics has the government met with the Privacy Commissioner to discuss FATCA or the effect of any IGA; (mm) broken down by province or territory, (i) on which dates and (ii) with what individuals in the provincial and territorial governments did the government consult on the subject of FATCA; (nn) broken down by province or territory, (i) on which dates and (ii) with what individuals in the provincial and territorial governments did the government consult on the subject of any IGA; (oo) does the government have the support of every province and territory with respect to any proposed implementation of FATCA, and what evidence does the government have that this support exists; (pp) has the Department of Justice developed any policy relative to the implementation of an IGA and, if so, (i) how was it developed, (ii) in consultation with whom, (iii) to whom was it provided, (iv) who requested it, (v) what were its findings, conclusions, and recommendations; (qq) how will the government monitor and enforce compliance by Canadian institutions with FATCA requirements; (rr) how will the government monitor and enforce regulatory oversight of the bank due-diligence efforts required by FATCA and its implementation, including (i) by whom (ii) how, (iii) using what standards such efforts will be evaluated; (ss) what penalties exist and what penalties does the government intend to establish for failure to adhere to standards indicated in (rr); (tt) has the Department of Justice or the Department of Revenue developed any legislation or guidance relative to the implementation of an IGA or FATCA and, if so (i) how was it developed, (ii) in consultation with whom, (iii) to whom was it provided, (iv) who requested it, (v) what were its findings, conclusions, and recommendations; (uu) has the Department of Justice reviewed any proposed legislation relative to the implementation of an IGA; (vv) with what individuals or groups has the Department of Justice consulted relative to the implementation of FATCA; (ww), what steps have been undertaken to assess regulatory changes to federal institutions at the provincial and territorial level that would be required as a result of FATCA or any IGA; (xx) what steps has the Canada Revenue Agency taken with regard to developing or implementing FATCA or any IGA; (yy) what tax information does the Canada Revenue agency currently share with the US, (i) when, (ii) under what circumstances, (iii) in what form; (zz) has the government assessed whether FATCA and its implementation would require changes to the ways in which tax information is currently shared with the US; (aaa) what has the government sought, or does the government plan to seek from the US, in terms of reciprocal information sharing as a result of the FATCA or IGA negotiations, and what is the current status of negotiations on this point; (bbb) what measures are in place to ensure that no privacy laws or policies are violated in any transfer of information contemplated in (aaa); and (ccc) by what process(es) and on what dates will any IGA and its enacting legislation be vetted for compliance with the (i) Constitution Act, 1867, (ii) Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, (iii) Canadian Bill of Rights?

There have been numerous articles written here not one of them favourable.

Those who are most negatively impacted here are NOT the rich and are not tax evaders. In many cases the cost of this is FBAR penalties not taxes since 82 percent of Americans abroad OR their foreign families would not ever owe any taxes to the U.S. Even Nina Olsen the tax payer advocate stated that congress was causing people to be harmed who were not the intended targets of FATCA in her report to congress. Ways and Means asked for those submissions so no, Patricia did not have any inside connection. She simply submitted a letter. She is a far cry from rich and she's hardly a right winger!

These are the people FATCA is harming.
http://we-are-not-a-myth.tumblr.com/

http://www.occupy.com/article/exposed-irs-colluding-banks-unfairly-target-us-citizens-abroad
http://globalnews.ca/news/782020/why-are-so-many-american-expats-giving-up-citizenship-its-a-taxing-issue/

There's a lot more where all of this came from. I find it sad that those living in the U.S. seem to think that if you are negatively impacted by all this you must be a tax cheat and if you are not then you should "just give up your citizenship" FATCA sounds laudable but, the way it is written needs amending. If the U.S. went to residency based taxation like the rest of the civilized world they could then concentrate on those really "off shoring" while not gather up long term expats, their foreign spouses, children, the elderly, border babies in high tax nations. FATCA is about penalty gathering as it is now and not taxes. Further it violates Canada's Charter of Rights but, the U.S. has said we can "just change" our laws. I wonder if our Parliament passed a law and bullied the U.S. into changing the constitution how that would fly. Especially with no benefit to the U.S. for doing so. FATCA needs to target criminals and instead it lumps in every expat with drug lords and money launderers.

laundry_queen

(8,646 posts)
111. Border babies
Tue Dec 3, 2013, 10:33 AM
Dec 2013

My grandparents lived 5 min from the US border and several of my aunts and uncles were born in the US because that's where the closest hospital was. They were dual citizens for all these years, but really had no use for their US citizenship except the occasional grocery shopping trip for my grandmother because, again, the closest town and store was in the US. My relatives never thought to renounce - how could they have foreseen that even though they've never lived in the US or had a US passport that some day they'd have to pay back taxes? My one aunt is a widow with young children just barely keeping her head above water - it would be sick and cruel for the US to make her pay back taxes on what she's earned just because my grandmother went to the closest hospital to have her.

RAFREE

(34 posts)
113. Sorry to say
Tue Dec 3, 2013, 11:34 AM
Dec 2013

Laundry Queen, your relatives need good advice as yes they ARE considered "U.S. persons" if they have a Canadian passport it will show place of birth. If they have ANY "U.S. indica" the bank will tell the IRS about them no matter if they have lived their entire lives in Canada. Further if they have not filed tax forms and FBARS because they didn't know they were supposed to because they didn't think they were American there are HIGH penalties on the late FBARS rich or not rich even if no tax is owed.

If FBAR penalties were eliminated for those who are not rich say under the tax exclusion this would not be so onerous on poor and middle income families. As it is though they will likely have to go into the Streamlined, then make an appointment to renounce.

As I said I know of one man who is in the same situation as your relatives and is taking his 90 year old mother to renounce nine days from now.

The U.S. is using a sledgehammer here to get the criminals and the problem is that it's harming a lot of unintended targets if they are unintended. For instance I have to wonder if 82 percent of expats would not ever owe any taxes why are such high FBAR penalties being applied to these people? It begins to look like FATCA is more about penalty collection at least in high tax countries which are not tax havens. In Canada it is particularly a mess with so many U.S. persons here with foreign family all affected. That's why the Canadian Civil Liberties association, the green party and many others have tried to fight back but, you cannot fight back against a powerful nation like the U.S. when they are threatening banks who do not "comply" The banks lobbied for the IGA's that will protect them. Like I said though there's no protection for people like your relatives, me or others I know thrown under the bus over this.

Freddie Stubbs

(29,853 posts)
114. Most Democrats in Congress supported this law. Most Republicans in Congress opposed it
Tue Dec 3, 2013, 12:04 PM
Dec 2013

President Obama signed it into law.

RAFREE

(34 posts)
117. Too bad
Tue Dec 3, 2013, 12:40 PM
Dec 2013

I don't think they fully understood the fall out on innocent families. The other thing of note is that it is a U.S. law, not a Canadian law. The U.S. is attempting and succeeding in ignoring our Parliament here. We don't pass laws in Canada and then tell the U.S to abide by them or else. It was hubris for the U.S. to pass this and then impose on other nations in violation of the laws of those nations.

This needs to go back to the drawing board and be amended so it CAN get people actually off shoring while not harming average and low income families abroad sometimes for decades, border babies, seniors in Canada etc.

There are ways. I'm worried the damage being done now. I do trust this will be fixed in the future but, right now it's really targeting the wrong people in the majority of cases. That's too bad. FATCA was hidden in the "Hire" act and sort of shoved through inside it. I doubt it was gone into real detail over.

In fact congress is NOW setting up a commission to study who expats are and how U.S. law impacts them. This is what should have been done BEFORE passing FATCA. That way they can see who should legitimately be targeted and who should not. As it is the data on expats is sorely lacking though ACA has the best available. It's too bad this wasn't better planned out. I thought it sounded good too at first! lol! It's not. It's really screwy to say the least.

riverbendviewgal

(4,252 posts)
122. Thank you for seeing the message.
Tue Dec 3, 2013, 01:16 PM
Dec 2013

If one can understand than the message will be forwarded to those who need to hear it.

riverbendviewgal

(4,252 posts)
121. Welcome to DU. RAFREE
Tue Dec 3, 2013, 01:14 PM
Dec 2013

You just signed on today and can give DU a wealth of information. Most of DUrs are Americans but they can benefit from your information and experiences on FATCA.


WELCOME!!!!!

RAFREE

(34 posts)
123. Thanks
Tue Dec 3, 2013, 01:32 PM
Dec 2013

I appreciate the welcome. I was a member here LONG ago and used to enjoy it. I just got away from posting her over five years ago and hadn't thought much about coming back till now.

Btw, I have a LOT of American family. Dad, sister, brother, aunts, cousins. I myself am only Canadian now as dual wasn't possible for me to keep however, that does not mean I don't care what goes on in the U.S. as if affects my entire family... Thanks again for the welcome.

Hassin Bin Sober

(26,328 posts)
136. I'm trying to figure out what your beef is with the law.
Tue Dec 3, 2013, 03:27 PM
Dec 2013

Is it that poor people have to pay US income tax on their foreign income? They don't - due to the $97,500 exemption.

Is it the fact they should have been filing returns but failed to do so? I feel bad for them but this has been policy for decades. Are they just finding out about it?

RAFREE

(34 posts)
156. It's difficult if
Tue Dec 3, 2013, 05:31 PM
Dec 2013

It's really hard if you haven't seen some of these complexities and how they are really harming people to explain. You really ought to meet the actual people and talk to them.

I cannot speak for everyone but, I have a few issues with it and it's not to do with taxes as you rightly claim they don't owe any. That's 82 percent of all expats would not owe any taxes. FATCA to me in that case is not about taxes then is it?

So what's it about? It's about FBAR penalties on low and middle income families that are utterly wrong and not necessary to the implementation of this law. Not even the IRS was telling anyone about FBAR and I know because I talked to them every single year. Not the embassies or consulates. No one told anyone who was outside the U.S. for decades. Only recent expats had any way to know. In fact FBAR was originally only meant for those living in the U.S. who had actual "off shore" high dollar accounts. When it was originally put in place it was not meant that those penalties be applied to those who had low income, where not hiding money, and did not owe any taxes.

The second thing that is bothersome is that FATCA does not just apply to U.S. persons. It applies to all your foreign relatives who live with you or you share any account with whether or not they have ever been American. In my household and many others this caused huge issues in people's marriages. Foreign spouses especially those who make the majority of income in their nation of birth and who have never had any gain from the U.S. do not understand why they must give the U.S. their banking information. It's against the law here in Canada for Canada to even ask your place of birth before providing services or to alter services based on your nation of birth or "national indicia" Should China or Iran demand upon pain of penalty that Canada violate our Charter of Rights and Freedoms we'd never have done it. Foreign spouses see this as a violation of their rights and privacy and many are protesting loudly here over it. My spouse cannot understand why Americans are so offended at the NSA reading emails and listening to phone calls but, think a Canadian should hand over to foreign country their bank account numbers, balances and transactions. The crafters of FATCA have already said that in many cases where FATCA was not about taxes it was about collecting data and that this data could be shared among other U.S. agencies. This did not warm my spouses heart. He does not want his banking data passed around among U.S. agencies without his consent or knowledge having never been American lived or worked there. To me the violation of the laws of Canada is one of the biggest issues and the second biggest is this sort of data collection going in the wrong hands is imperial over reach.

Since FATCA violates the laws of Canada as the Canadian Civil Liberties Association points out among others the U.S. has said that in those cases that other countries could just "change their laws" to be in compliance with you. I personally don't think that was well thought through. Canada doesn't make it's laws in the U.S. congress, we make our laws in our Parliament *until now* this sets a dangerous bar for U.S. over reach and many Canadians are very sensitive to such issues. As the elder Trudeau pointed out we deal with the elephant to the south.

I also know of people having their children's disability savings funds penalized, education funds penalized and many other savings vehicles normal families here can have unless there is an American in the family. I know one person who was told his mortgage wasn't going to be renewed as the bank did not want American customers any longer. This person wasn't in Canada but, another country and he's not the only person this happened to. He's a vet and since he couldn't have his family lose their home and can't move back with no job he renounced to keep their home. Things like this just should not be happening to ordinary people all over the world.

Another woman I know has a son with severe disabilities and he'll be on the hook for all this form filing and costs including having his disability savings taxed because it isn't taxed here. She was afraid after her death he won't be able to comply with all this and so sought to renounce him. She was told she cannot renounce him as he doesn't have the capacity to understand such so now he'll be out of compliance and fined if his information is "exchanged" by the bank due to his U.S. "indicia" even though he was born in Canada. He is considered a "U.S. person" because he has one U.S. parent even though never registered as such. You do not have to register a foreign child for the U.S. to claim them for tax purposes and all that, that implies.

FATCA has many, many complications for millions of people most of whom are not rich and most of whom would never owe a dime in taxes. It's not about taxes as you so aptly pointed out.

My main problem with it is that low and middle income people are indeed being harmed by it as it is now written. It needs amending. And it would have been nice if the U.S. could set the tone by starting at home first before threatening other nations if they don't go along they will be penalized. For instance Delaware has huge tax haven issues with shell corporations, Utah has issues, so does Nevada. Could they not have gone after those at home actually "Off shoring" before being a bit of a bully about this in high tax nations against most expats who would owe not tax?

Then there is the cost of compliance. I see you stated something about turbo tax? That won't work for long term expats who have savings accounts and other situations. You need a professional and they are expensive outside the U.S. The one you saw that was 300 dollars? You mean H and R Block?? There was a sign up in the Ottawa embassy saying not to use them as they do not know what they are doing. To get anyone who really understands the forms you may need you will have to pay upwards of two to three thousand a year taxes owed or not and in most cases not. MANY families cannot afford this and can't justify the cost. The U.S. person in the family becomes a financial burden and a burden otherwise due causing their family member to be treated differently than every other citizen of their home country for banking and savings purposes. So then the U.S. person gets to choose to take their name off everything so the foreign family isn't penalized. That presents a lot of issues for those households where the U.S. person doesn't make the income. It makes a pauper out of them. OR they can renounce in such cases but, that means you are being made to choose between your country of birth or your foreign family. For some that's quite an ordeal. If that's the way the U.S. wants it though then that's the way it is. I hardly think it's reasonable and most people here find it outrageous since Canada doesn't attempt things like this on non residence and is actually appreciative of their expat community so most here just don't get the extremes the U.S. is going to.

This is quite too long really. FATCA however is not all it appears on the surface and is complicated. I've had two years of reading about it and seeing it up close here to realize it's not the best way to accomplish attacking tax havens. The fall out for innocent people especially the elderly affected is far too great. It CAN work but, with amendments.

There are ways to go after tax cheats and there are ways to address tax haven issues without all the fall out FATCA is causing. It's gone over like a lead balloon here for many reasons and not just with those families who have an American in them.

 

Boudica the Lyoness

(2,899 posts)
129. I'm a British Citizen and US green card holder
Tue Dec 3, 2013, 02:16 PM
Dec 2013

I have lived in the US for 40 years. We worked hard for what we have. We pay all our taxes in the US.

If Britain taxed me for what I have here that would be so unfair.

RAFREE

(34 posts)
139. Green card holder
Tue Dec 3, 2013, 03:47 PM
Dec 2013

I see your point as most countries do not tax on citizenship. However, I think the major issues with FATCA are not about "taxes" To talk about taxes confuses the issues people are having as most of them would owe no tax. I do think it would be easier to catch those hiding money if the U.S. had residency based taxation since the people living in the U.S. but, off shoring and hiding money secretly could be focused on in a more concentrated manner.

Yes, the U.S. taxes on citizenship rather than residency. What's at issue with FATCA is rather than saying "We're going after criminal tax cheats" they have passed this law which penalizes a lot of people who would owe no tax and who are not "tax cheats" Those parts of this law such as FBAR penalties on zero taxes owed are a major problem here. Especially for those with no U.S. connection or very tenuous such as border babies, the elderly who haven't been in the U.S. for decades, children of one U.S. parent who never considered nor availed themselves of U.S. citizenship, foreign spouses who never have lived nor worked in the U.S. etc..

There are better ways to address this issue. I should have known better than to think a law would be passed to punish the uber rich who are actually hiding or stealing tax monies while not harming the lowly and average U.S. persons living in high tax nations. What was I thinking? Those people have a lot of pull and the minnows do not. So everyone will be told this is about getting taxes when really it's penalties on a lot of accidental Americans who never knew they were supposed to file paperwork showing they didn't owe a dime in taxes. Those people shouldn't be subjected to high penalties.


Some of the people I'm talking to here are having a hellish time and everyone of them is well over fifty. Not one was rich...as I said the unintended consequences need to be addressed asap.

I was at a protest recently outside a big bankers meeting. They kept coming out and one banker said to me "We didn't want this either, we know a some innocent people are being hurt by it." My reply to him was "Yes, but an IGA protects YOU from being sued over it as it's against Canadian law and throws everyone other than YOU bankers under the bus. You pushed for the IGA for that reason." He just looked very sheepishly at me, then looked at the ground and couldn't even answer me. He just walked away.

Once again another law that protects the banks *and they're breaking Canadian law doing this* and sells out everyone else. This cannot be what FATCA was intended to do!

My hope is that it will go back to the drawing board after next year when the commission is going. Unfortunately, with the clock ticking many are losing their citizenship or being penalized when they shouldn't be. You know when you submit something in university you are supposed to have done your research from every angle possible. Congress did not do that with this law. How could they? They didn't have any data to do so. In the future they will have a better idea. In the meantime...as I said, this is a big mess.

As a green card holder if you ever move permanently back to Britain you will be subjected to this too and your foreign wife, child or anyone else you have a local bank account with. Be sure to keep up with the ever changing requirements or you could face large penalties on paperwork *not taxes* such as FBAR. Many green card holders here are just letting them expire and not renewing.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Warning! USA invading Ca...