Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 12:36 PM Dec 2013

Obama closing Vatican embassy? More proof of Republicans' desperate and distorted parallel reality

No, Obama Is Not Closing The Vatican Embassy

By Judd Legum

The internet is ablaze with some fairly shocking news: Obama is closing the Vatican embassy! “Obama’s call to close Vatican embassy is ‘slap in the face’ to Roman Catholics,” proclaims the Washington Times, in an article that has attracted more than 2700 comments and was prominently featured on the Drudge Report. “OBAMA ‘INSULTS’ CATHOLICS IN VATICAN-EMBASSY SHUTDOWN,” reports WND. The Daily Caller piles on with “Catholics furious over Obama plan to close Vatican embassy site.” Breitbart reports that “the Obama administration is trying to diminish and discredit the Vatican’s role in the world because it’s pro-life, pro-family, and pro-religious freedom values is at odds with the Regime’s pro-abortion, pro-gay marriage stance.”

So you might be surprised to learn that, in fact, Obama is not closing the embassy — or diminishing U.S. diplomatic relations with the Holy See in any way.

There are no embassies for any country in Vatican City itself — there is simply no room. All countries locate their embassies in the city of Rome. The United States has decided to move its embassy from its current location — an unremarkable converted residence — to the same compound as the U.S. Embassy to Italy. It will have it’s own separate building and a separate entrance on a different street. The new building is actually a tenth of a mile closer to the Vatican than the old one. There will be no reduction in staff or activities.

This hasn’t stopped 5 former U.S. envoys to the Vatican — including James Nicholson, the former chair of the Republican National Committee — from protesting. Nicholson characterized the move as “a massive downgrade.” Raymond Flynn, the first ambassador under Clinton, told the National Catholic Review that “It’s not just those who bomb churches and kill Catholics in the Middle East who are our antagonists, but it’s also those who restrict our religious freedoms and want to close down our embassy to the Holy See.” Flynn “described the move as part of broader secular hostility to religious groups.”

- more -

http://thinkprogress.org/security/2013/11/27/3001491/obama-closing-vatican-embassy/


NRSC Quietly Abandons Protest Of Vatican Embassy 'Closure'

The National Republican Senatorial Committee launched a petition last week to protest what it described as the "latest anti-religion pursuit" by the Obama administration, but it looks like the group is already abandoning its crusade.

A webpage that took aim at President Obama for his "plans to close the U.S. Embassy to the Vatican" is nowhere to be found on the NRSC's website. The original URL (http://yourvoice.nrsc.org/landing/vatican-embassy/) now directs back to the NRSC's homepage.

"The media is reporting that President Obama plans to close the U.S. Embassy to the Vatican," the page read. "This is just the latest anti-religion pursuit of this Administration, a slap in the face to Catholic-Americans around the country that weakens America’s position as a global leader."

Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush (R) joined the NRSC's condemnation, wondering on Twitter if the purported closure was the White House's "retribution for Catholic organizations opposing Obamacare."

Jeb Bush ✔ @JebBush
Follow
Why would our President close our Embassy to the Vatican? Hopefully, it is not retribution for Catholic organizations opposing Obamacare.
6:12 PM - 27 Nov 2013

303 Retweets 113 favorites

- more -

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/nrsc-quietly-abandons-protest-of-vatican-embassy-closure

Jeb Bush proves he's just another stupid Republican asshole.

17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Obama closing Vatican embassy? More proof of Republicans' desperate and distorted parallel reality (Original Post) ProSense Dec 2013 OP
This is to be expected from the GOP noise machine Gothmog Dec 2013 #1
Epic Fail Botany Dec 2013 #2
I seem to remember pro-Reagan evangelicals gnashing teeth at the Gipper... JHB Dec 2013 #3
If President Obama really wanted to insult Catholics, the headline would read SwankyXomb Dec 2013 #4
Washington Times, Drudge, WND, desperate congressional Republicans . . . has this hit FoxNews yet? Jack Rabbit Dec 2013 #5
Could they all be trying to distract attention thucythucy Dec 2013 #6
**facepalm** The Traveler Dec 2013 #7
It's a panic-y reaction to Rush crapping on the Catholics recently Sheepshank Dec 2013 #8
See how the GOP bubble works? Cali_Democrat Dec 2013 #9
more lies. rooting for america to fail spanone Dec 2013 #10
Message auto-removed Name removed Dec 2013 #11
But...but... I just said bye to you in another thread... ScreamingMeemie Dec 2013 #12
I just sent it on it's merry way. hrmjustin Dec 2013 #13
He's actually moving it closer to the Vatican. JaneyVee Dec 2013 #14
Ah ... but it moved in the WRONG DIRECTION ... JoePhilly Dec 2013 #17
Republicans are clearly aliens SpankMe Dec 2013 #15
clearly you do not understand what was in the article Botany Dec 2013 #16

Gothmog

(145,289 posts)
1. This is to be expected from the GOP noise machine
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 12:45 PM
Dec 2013

Facts do not matter to the GOP or the right wing nutcases who support the GOP

Botany

(70,510 posts)
2. Epic Fail
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 01:22 PM
Dec 2013


But the embassy isn't actually closing. It's re-locating to a larger U.S. compound in Rome, a move that will save more than $1.4 million and bolster security. Vatican officials even dismissed the re-location as a non-issue.

JHB

(37,160 posts)
3. I seem to remember pro-Reagan evangelicals gnashing teeth at the Gipper...
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 01:42 PM
Dec 2013

...for establishing it in the first place. (Evangelicals' anti-Catholicism all too often lies just below the aw-shucks surface.)

Since Jeb implied the "closure" was "retribution" against Catholics, will evangelicals take offense that it isn't actually being closed?

SwankyXomb

(2,030 posts)
4. If President Obama really wanted to insult Catholics, the headline would read
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 01:51 PM
Dec 2013

"OBAMA WITHDRAWS U.S. RECOGNITION OF VATICAN STATE"

or

"OBAMA ADMIN SEIZES ALL CATHOLIC PROPERTY IN U.S., WILL PAY VICTIMS OF ABUSE"

Those stories might be insulting. This is just more ODS.

Jack Rabbit

(45,984 posts)
5. Washington Times, Drudge, WND, desperate congressional Republicans . . . has this hit FoxNews yet?
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 01:52 PM
Dec 2013

It looks like we have twice the usual suspects.

thucythucy

(8,066 posts)
6. Could they all be trying to distract attention
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 02:49 PM
Dec 2013

from the fact that the Pope doesn't seem to be a fan of their "screw the poor, oppress the weak, and let the powerful 1% inherit the earth" brand of GOP "Christianity"?

 

The Traveler

(5,632 posts)
7. **facepalm**
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 02:55 PM
Dec 2013

My first observation is that moving the Vatican embassy from a "unremarkable converted residence" to it's own building in the US Embassy compound is justified at least in part on security considerations. I don't see how it can be regarded as a "downgrade".

Are these people just this stupid, or do they know better and are just this vile and dishonest?

Trav

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
8. It's a panic-y reaction to Rush crapping on the Catholics recently
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 02:56 PM
Dec 2013
http://www.salon.com/2013/11/27/rush_limbaugh_the_pope_sounds_like_a_marxist/

I think they are on some stupid "pass the blame/damage control" type of reasoning.

Too late bozo's

Response to ProSense (Original post)

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
17. Ah ... but it moved in the WRONG DIRECTION ...
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 06:05 PM
Dec 2013

See .. the GOP is measuring the distance from the Embassy if you go out the BACK GATE of the Vatican, and then continue all the way around the world.

When you measure it THAT way, the Embassy has in fact, moved further away.

I'm pretty sure Chuck Todd will do an entire segment on the Vatican-Back-Gate Scandal tomorrow morning, explaining how the GOP's method of measuring the distance by going around the entire planet is perfectly reasonable.

SpankMe

(2,957 posts)
15. Republicans are clearly aliens
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 03:54 PM
Dec 2013

1. Saving taxpayer dollars with an embassy move. (Reducing government spending is something Republicans favor).

2. Improving security. (Republicans called for after improved embassy security after the Benghazi attack. So, again, something Republicans should favor.)

Give the administration any credit - or, at least let it pass as a neutral event? Hells no!! Re-cast it as something evil and hammer away on every right wing media source available!

Will the mainstream media report honestly on this to correct the record? Hells no!! They'll remain silent about it, or will report it as a he said - she said story.

Botany

(70,510 posts)
16. clearly you do not understand what was in the article
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 05:57 PM
Dec 2013

"But the embassy isn't actually closing. It's re-locating to a larger U.S. compound in Rome, a
move that will save more than $1.4 million and bolster security. Vatican officials even dismissed
the re-location as a non-issue."

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/nrsc-quietly-abandons-protest-of-vatican-embassy-closure

do I need to add this?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Obama closing Vatican emb...