Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 01:41 PM Dec 2013

Wealthy white suburbanites want to secede from Baton Rouge

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/12/01/affluent-white-residents-of-south-baton-rouge-propose-seceding-from-citys-poor-black-northern-areas/

The predominantly white and wealthy residents of the southern area of Baton Rouge have proposed seceding from the city proper and incorporating into a new one to be called “St. George.”

The movement began as an effort to create a new school district, but after the state legislature repeatedly mothballed its proposals — claiming that they could not approve an independent school district that was unaffiliated with a city — organizers shifted their energies to the creation of “St. George.”...

The demographic shift the incorporation of “St. George” would create is almost as troubling as the economic difficulties. According to recent study on the demographic impact of Hurricane Katrina, the city of Baton Rouge accepted over 200,000 displaced New Orleans residents, the majority of whom were black and settled in the northern, urban parts of the city.

The “St. George” proposal would create a poor, black, and urban Baton Rouge and a wealthy, white, and suburban “St. George.” Supporters of the new city brush off such complaints. “Typically, the only comments you hear are those that try to create fear,” one of the leaders of the movement, Norman Browning said. “They never support it with any documentation to make those claims.”


12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

DavidDvorkin

(19,479 posts)
5. That's been a place name in that area for quite some time
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 03:36 PM
Dec 2013

Such names are common in Louisiana because of its history, not because of current politics.

Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
2. Unfortunately, this is nothing new.
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 02:06 PM
Dec 2013

It's the epitome of "white flight," only, this time they're not physically fleeing - they're fleeing by fiat.

brush

(53,781 posts)
4. What is it about this "self-segregation" stuff that always seems to involve . . .
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 03:23 PM
Dec 2013

well, I have to say it — white people?

I mean talk about ethnocentrism.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
6. Actually the area you post is seceding from Baton Rouge is not incorporated and does not
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 11:26 PM
Dec 2013

Need to secede. The proper name is Village St George and has white population of 71% and a black population of 23%. Some have jumped on knee jerk action without the proper information.

 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
8. This all started because they wanted to create their own school district
Tue Dec 3, 2013, 12:21 AM
Dec 2013

which would be considerably whiter than Baton Rouge's. 23% black population is slightly below the statewide average for Louisiana, let alone an urban area.

edit: Also, all the sales tax revenue from the mall would go to the new city, not East Baton Rouge Parish, which paid for all the infrastructure out there.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
9. It has been Village St George for several years, a street in the area has been George O'Neal during
Tue Dec 3, 2013, 12:32 AM
Dec 2013

The time when the area was farm land. They have had a volunteer fire department for many of the years the subdivision has existed because they was not in the incorporated area of East Baton Rouge parish. The city of Baton Rouge did not extend their services to them, so what is the big deal for them to incorporate now. Tis true they have some nice houses but not the largest and biggest in the parish so where is the knee jerk action on them being excluded from Baton Rouge?

 

Chan790

(20,176 posts)
11. Considering SI.
Tue Dec 3, 2013, 01:11 AM
Dec 2013

The state of NY should have let them go...but made them become part of NJ. NY's gain could be NJ's loss. I'd wager the majority of Staten Islanders would have no interest in seceding from the rest of NYC though if they had to become part of NJ.

Actually, wasn't that around the same time NYC and NY State tried to make Marble Hill part of The Bronx (for like the 4th time) because they're north of the rerouted Hudson Canal, putting them on the mainland and the residents keep voting it down because they want to remain part of Manhattan for prestige reasons?

Also, around the same time NJ tried to claim that Ellis Island and The Statue of Liberty are in NJ and the city and state of NY owed them absurd amounts of money?

What was it with NYC in the late 1990s and weird border fights?

 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
12. Gov. Wittman and Mayor Guiliani did not really like one another. Even though they were from the
Tue Dec 3, 2013, 01:17 AM
Dec 2013

same party. The lawsuit was over a decade old at the time. SI wanted to become a city in NY. SI has changed somewhat and I am not sure it would pass today. Marble Hill voted as you said to stay because they were Manhattan at one point and want to remain so.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Wealthy white suburbanite...