recognize need for PrezO, so means We the People must do LOTS to re-establish Dem majority in House and maintain and enhance Dem majority in Senate.

since we prefer to donate to the DNC anyway? If Obama's money is not going to the States and local races, does it mean that the DNC's money is only going to those races?

Frankly, seeing the Republican candidates that Obama has to run against, I don't see what's so hard about the next election.

And by nice I mean...yikes.

now he wakes up because HIS election is at stake. I'd rather give to the senate and house races, Wqrren in Mass, and whoever dems put up in Maine also other close races in country, we need to keep senate this cycle.

the comments sound like they were cut and pasted from FR.

. . . a report put out weeks ago, intended as a wedge issue to set Democrats against each other; or to make it appear that there's a wedge.

You have to question the motivation of folks who push stories like this. It certainly didn't come from party leaders, despite the 'Democratic source' cited in this almost month-old gossip.

The national committee has to at least put up an opponent.

We locals can handle the rest. Just give us a viable guy that can get the local women stirred up about birth control.

Democrats are giving up in many vulnerable districts without even trying.

for those Dems who turned on him ...