Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
Thu Dec 5, 2013, 02:22 PM Dec 2013

City Council votes to regulate e-cigarette sales in L.A.



Calling it a potential health risk and a gateway to tobacco use, the Los Angeles City Council on Wednesday voted unanimously to regulate the sales of e-cigarettes and other "vaping" devices.

The new law puts electronic smoking devices in the same category as tobacco products, subjecting their sales to the same restrictions. It bans sales from street kiosks, ice cream trucks and self-service displays, and requires retailers to obtain a license before selling the products.

Parallel legislation under city consideration would ban the use of e-cigarettes in the same places that tobacco is prohibited, including restaurants and parks. Sales of e-cigarettes to minors are already banned under state law, and 59 California counties and cities, including Glendale and Burbank, require a license to sell e-cigarettes.

"It's important to protect young people from this deadly habit and to protect people from second-hand smoke," said Councilman Paul Koretz, who pushed the ordinance.

http://www.latimes.com/local/la-me-1205-e-cigarette-regs-20131205,0,7451459.story
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
City Council votes to regulate e-cigarette sales in L.A. (Original Post) onehandle Dec 2013 OP
Reasonable regulation is one thing. Bans are another. And Koretz is an idiot. Comrade Grumpy Dec 2013 #1
+ 1 russspeakeasy Dec 2013 #2
 

Comrade Grumpy

(13,184 posts)
1. Reasonable regulation is one thing. Bans are another. And Koretz is an idiot.
Thu Dec 5, 2013, 02:29 PM
Dec 2013

"It's important to...protect people from second-hand smoke," he said.

There is no smoke, thus there is no second-hand smoke.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»City Council votes to reg...