General Discussion

Playinghardball

(11,665 posts) Sun Dec 8, 2013, 04:07 PM Dec 2013

Santorum needs to slither back into obscurity....

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Santorum needs to slither back into obscurity.... (Original Post) Playinghardball Dec 2013 OP

You can't mean that. immoderate Dec 2013 #1

Hanging with his RepubliBud Cabal at the Frat Rat House Berlum Dec 2013 #2

Rick is an idiot Gothmog Dec 2013 #3

I didn't know he'd slithered out of it. nt nyquil_man Dec 2013 #4

Please little Rick Nite Owl Dec 2013 #5

We just need to Google him some more tabbycat31 Dec 2013 #6

I think he would make a GREAT Republican nominee for President in 2016 Douglas Carpenter Dec 2013 #7

immoderate

(20,885 posts)

1. You can't mean that.

Reply to Playinghardball (Original post)

Sun Dec 8, 2013, 04:13 PM

Dec 2013

I'd recommend leaving him out front.

--imm

Berlum

(7,044 posts)

2. Hanging with his RepubliBud Cabal at the Frat Rat House

Reply to Playinghardball (Original post)

Sun Dec 8, 2013, 04:14 PM

Dec 2013

Gothmog

(145,345 posts)

3. Rick is an idiot

Reply to Playinghardball (Original post)

Sun Dec 8, 2013, 04:45 PM

Dec 2013

He is too stupid to understand why his comments are wrong

nyquil_man

(1,443 posts)

4. I didn't know he'd slithered out of it. nt

Reply to Playinghardball (Original post)

Sun Dec 8, 2013, 05:24 PM

Dec 2013

Nite Owl

(11,303 posts)

5. Please little Rick

Reply to Playinghardball (Original post)

Sun Dec 8, 2013, 06:11 PM

Dec 2013

run!
We could run a stick, mark it with a D and easily have another democratic term.

tabbycat31

(6,336 posts)

6. We just need to Google him some more

Reply to Playinghardball (Original post)

Sun Dec 8, 2013, 06:47 PM

Dec 2013

Dan Savage's page is not even on the front page anymore.

People need to see Frothy when they google this guy.

Douglas Carpenter

(20,226 posts)

7. I think he would make a GREAT Republican nominee for President in 2016

Reply to Playinghardball (Original post)

Sun Dec 8, 2013, 06:55 PM

Dec 2013

Reply to this discussion