Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

applegrove

(118,767 posts)
Sun Dec 8, 2013, 11:27 PM Dec 2013

"Why Americans Are So Angry" at the Economist

Why Americans Are So Angry

at the Economist/Business Insider

http://www.businessinsider.com/why-americans-are-so-angry-2013-12

"SNIP.....................................


Trust in institutions has risen and fallen over that same post-war period in line with external events, plunging after the Watergate scandal, for instance, and during recessions. Yet something new seems to be happening. Anti-government cynicism is feeding on gulfs in society.

Conservatives think Democrats buy votes with welfare

Consider the crisis around Obamacare. Forget fussing about its useless website: websites can be fixed. The president’s headache is that voters see his plan as welfare for the poor rather than a better way of delivering medical care.

That is exposing ugly divisions. Most starkly, a majority of whites think the law will make life worse for them, a National Journal poll found, while most non-whites believe it will help people like them. That in turn tallies with a big change over the previous 15 years: a collapse in support among conservatives for government safety nets.

This is America’s real problem with trust. The country faces a crisis of mutual resentment, masquerading as a general collapse in national morale. Sharply-delineated voter blocs are alarmingly willing to believe that rival groups are up to no good or taking more than their fair share. Polls describing America as a hell-hole of corruption are not to be taken literally. They are a warning. America is not a low-trust society. But it risks becoming one.



....................................SNIP"
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Why Americans Are So Angry" at the Economist (Original Post) applegrove Dec 2013 OP
Racist shitheads. "Worse for them" means "more brown people" Warren Stupidity Dec 2013 #1
Yup. And notice how the base is not let to suffer the loss of Nelson Mandela unmolested..it has applegrove Dec 2013 #2
More piping hot bullshit from The Economist . . . hatrack Dec 2013 #3
He goes on to say this in the next sentence: applegrove Dec 2013 #5
Their theory is bullshit BeyondGeography Dec 2013 #4
excellent assessment Skittles Dec 2013 #6
 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
1. Racist shitheads. "Worse for them" means "more brown people"
Sun Dec 8, 2013, 11:54 PM
Dec 2013

using the same doctors and health care services they use.

applegrove

(118,767 posts)
2. Yup. And notice how the base is not let to suffer the loss of Nelson Mandela unmolested..it has
Sun Dec 8, 2013, 11:57 PM
Dec 2013

turned into a hatefest. The worst thing for the GOP would be if the base ever got to revere someone black. Their whole strategy for rich elite rule would go down the toilet.

hatrack

(59,592 posts)
3. More piping hot bullshit from The Economist . . .
Mon Dec 9, 2013, 12:01 AM
Dec 2013

"The president’s headache is that voters see his plan as welfare for the poor rather than a better way of delivering medical care."

That's right, "voters" see his plan as welfare. Uh-huh, all voters, every last motherfucking one of them, which explains how it got through Congress, vehemently and violently opposed as it was by countless millions of Americans back in the far-off days of 2009 and early 2010.

It wouldn't have anything to do with "low-information voters" (a.k.a. "morons&quot and the Fox News Disinfotron playing 24/7, unlimited contributions from dark money groups and 1,001 astroturf flowers blooming from the rank and reeking sewage disposal swales hastily and ineptly installed to handle the coliform load from the rotting corpse of Reagan's "legacy".

No, no, it's that all the voters hate the plan. That's it. Uh-huh.

applegrove

(118,767 posts)
5. He goes on to say this in the next sentence:
Mon Dec 9, 2013, 12:27 AM
Dec 2013

"That is exposing ugly divisions. Most starkly, a majority of whites think the law will make life worse for them, a National Journal poll found, while most non-whites believe it will help people like them. That in turn tallies with a big change over the previous 15 years: a collapse in support among conservatives for government safety nets."

Should we not know how people are lining up on this?

BeyondGeography

(39,377 posts)
4. Their theory is bullshit
Mon Dec 9, 2013, 12:15 AM
Dec 2013

It's about money. Four decades of too many individuals working their asses off and getting basically nowhere. The more it sinks in, the nastier they get. And will continue to get.

There's one reference in there to inequality. Nothing about where it comes from. People are getting ripped off and have been for ages, and the government is the least of the problem. Their productivity gains have been consistently absorbed by capital, a fancy way of saying stolen by the owners, not redistributed to employees, a problem which has been brutally compounded by supply side voodoo horseshit economics., That's the lead, the big change, not age old resentments that will always be there, even in the "good" times.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"Why Americans Are S...