Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
At some point, the private sector is going to have to start pulling its own weight again. (Original Post) Recursion Dec 2013 OP
OR if most of their employees are part-time ErikJ Dec 2013 #1
A single-payer health system would go a long way to alleviating this problem! LongTomH Dec 2013 #4
It would help a lot of people stay out of poverty passiveporcupine Dec 2013 #5
Exactly. I dont object to a ceo being paid millions mind you but a company like walmart should not cstanleytech Dec 2013 #10
I object to CEOs making millions of dollars. WowSeriously Dec 2013 #11
I didnt say you had to support it just that I personally dont object cstanleytech Dec 2013 #16
I have no problem with someone making millions on a good business passiveporcupine Dec 2013 #18
So long as the reward is proportional to the employee's input FrodosPet Dec 2013 #19
The reason CEOs make millions is because of the WowSeriously Dec 2013 #20
...and out of the country. tecelote Dec 2013 #22
A single payer health care system would practically eliminate this problem. mountain grammy Dec 2013 #21
Perfectly stated. nt Demo_Chris Dec 2013 #2
Yes sir or yes ma'am! Brigid Dec 2013 #3
Seriously. WHO is shiftless and lazy? tblue Dec 2013 #6
The people who make money with money. WowSeriously Dec 2013 #12
Terrific, TRUE message. Simply put. Kurovski Dec 2013 #7
GREATgraphic!! Spread it around! annabanana Dec 2013 #8
Agreed +infinity. nt cstanleytech Dec 2013 #9
HUGE K & R !!! WillyT Dec 2013 #13
Isn't this the result of 30 years of "trickle down" peonage? dougolat Dec 2013 #14
K&R hay rick Dec 2013 #15
, blkmusclmachine Dec 2013 #17
True...so true... KansDem Dec 2013 #23
No, they don't. As long as they control the goernment and ensure that our tax money is SharonAnn Dec 2013 #24

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
5. It would help a lot of people stay out of poverty
Wed Dec 11, 2013, 04:27 PM
Dec 2013

but a lot of people are needing assistance without even getting medical care. They are doing without any health care and they still need help with food or heat or housing.

We need more than just affordable health care for all...but it's a start. What the health care crisis is doing is making more people fall into the "needing help" category than would have anyway.

The issue this thread is about is unfair wages...inequality of wealth and income distribution. It is unfairly being distributed to the top right now.

cstanleytech

(26,318 posts)
10. Exactly. I dont object to a ceo being paid millions mind you but a company like walmart should not
Wed Dec 11, 2013, 09:36 PM
Dec 2013

be allowed to force its employees to live at or below the poverty level either.

cstanleytech

(26,318 posts)
16. I didnt say you had to support it just that I personally dont object
Wed Dec 11, 2013, 10:41 PM
Dec 2013

if the ceo makes millions just as long as its not at the expense of forcing the employees for the company to live at or below the poverty level.

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
18. I have no problem with someone making millions on a good business
Thu Dec 12, 2013, 12:24 AM
Dec 2013

new invention, creation, or whatever...as long as the equity is shared by all who share in the production of the company. In other words, if the CEO or owner are making millions, the rest of the workers should be earning fantastic rewards as well. The success of the company should be shared by all. If it isn't, it's not fair and it's not good for the economy or community.

FrodosPet

(5,169 posts)
19. So long as the reward is proportional to the employee's input
Thu Dec 12, 2013, 02:04 AM
Dec 2013

A constantly tardy/absent slacker doing minimal work should not be as well rewarded as the woman who is there 10 minutes early and stays two hours late, doing not only her own work, but fixing the messes made by Mr Slacker.

 

WowSeriously

(343 posts)
20. The reason CEOs make millions is because of the
Thu Dec 12, 2013, 02:26 AM
Dec 2013

Low marginal tax rates. Prior to Reagan so much of the income above three million would go towards taxes that the company would reinvest the money back in the company. Additionally, the strong unions ensured the workers received appropriate wages, and the company pensions were properly funded.

Now, it all flows to the top and out of the company.

mountain grammy

(26,645 posts)
21. A single payer health care system would practically eliminate this problem.
Thu Dec 12, 2013, 02:52 AM
Dec 2013

While a raise in the minimum wage is still necessary, if the burden of providing some sort of health care benefits disappears, one of the biggest obstacles between labor and management is removed. One of the reasons unions flourish in Canada and Germany is there are no expensive health care benefits on the table.

tblue

(16,350 posts)
6. Seriously. WHO is shiftless and lazy?
Wed Dec 11, 2013, 04:27 PM
Dec 2013

Who makes money doing just about nothing? Not the poor, I know that.

Kurovski

(34,655 posts)
7. Terrific, TRUE message. Simply put.
Wed Dec 11, 2013, 04:39 PM
Dec 2013

The internet and photoshop are the greatest blessings since manna/chocolate chip cookies.

May it blanket facebook pages everywhere.

dougolat

(716 posts)
14. Isn't this the result of 30 years of "trickle down" peonage?
Wed Dec 11, 2013, 10:28 PM
Dec 2013

High finance "private profits - public losses" means: "Screw the masses" and we didn't bail out the banksters so the abuse could continue!

The 1% meme holds a powerful truth.

KansDem

(28,498 posts)
23. True...so true...
Thu Dec 12, 2013, 11:33 AM
Dec 2013

These One-Percenter slackers need to get up off their butts and get to work. We can't keep pulling them along.

SharonAnn

(13,778 posts)
24. No, they don't. As long as they control the goernment and ensure that our tax money is
Thu Dec 12, 2013, 01:18 PM
Dec 2013

funneled to them, they don't need to change a darned thing. And it's a lot easier for them to do this than it is to operative in a competitive economy.

Just capture the government and take all the money. Simple.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»At some point, the privat...