Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

CK_John

(10,005 posts)
Mon Dec 16, 2013, 07:05 PM Dec 2013

What the GOP knows and Big ED doesn't. It's structural, There are no jobs.

This is why they are forgoing any extension of jobless benefits.. The GOP understand that Cyber-era productivity does not produce enough jobs for our population.

So their position is simply not to throw good money at this problem. It will not get them any votes or produce any solution.


Extent Soc Sec to those age 50, is a start.

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

mucifer

(23,559 posts)
1. Plenty of jobs that were sent over seas. If we had better laws this would not have happened.
Mon Dec 16, 2013, 07:10 PM
Dec 2013

The cat's out of the bag now. The laws changed decades ago and greed is king.

CK_John

(10,005 posts)
10. When robot welders put 9000 people out of 1 plant no need to blame others
Mon Dec 16, 2013, 07:40 PM
Dec 2013

It's technology not people moving.

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
2. And start rebuilding our crumbling infrastructure like
Mon Dec 16, 2013, 07:11 PM
Dec 2013

Obama wanted. Of course that money would go to labor and manufacturing and not the Wall Street banksters and oil billionaires which is why the Repukes don't want it.

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
6. Can't do that infrastructure repair thing...it adds to the price of the property
Mon Dec 16, 2013, 07:20 PM
Dec 2013

and Wall St wants to buy ALL the infrastructure and do it on the CHEAP.

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
7. You get what I mean. If Wall Street can't get their hands in the cookie jar they are going
Mon Dec 16, 2013, 07:25 PM
Dec 2013

to make sure nobody else does either. It's time to start bringing them down. It will take the Atty General to do it though and I don't think he will.

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
8. The place to start is purging the 3rd Way Bankster Budds from office.
Mon Dec 16, 2013, 07:30 PM
Dec 2013

We've got to run folks from the Progressive Wing to run in primaries and WIN there.

CK_John

(10,005 posts)
11. This will just have mac jobs move to contruction jobs, not a large net job number increase..
Mon Dec 16, 2013, 07:44 PM
Dec 2013

Also construction has become highly automated.

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
12. Don't construction jobs pay well? Also, we need to start replacing our dirty energy with
Mon Dec 16, 2013, 07:51 PM
Dec 2013

clean energy. That seems like more jobs to me. The steel needs to be made and parts manufactured so that will provide manufacturing jobs if our stupid Congress doesn't give the business to China.

upaloopa

(11,417 posts)
3. We could borrow money from the Fed at zero interest and
Mon Dec 16, 2013, 07:13 PM
Dec 2013

fund infrastructure repair and build new infrastructure. The idea was called infrastructure bank.
The repubs will not let it happen
All jobs are not systems related.

 

Taitertots

(7,745 posts)
4. Non-sense. The GOP opposes increased spending BECAUSE it would create jobs, not because it won't
Mon Dec 16, 2013, 07:15 PM
Dec 2013

If Obama spent money and caused a recovery, it would be the death of the Republican party for 20 years.

That said....
Turn the SS tax from a regressive tax, into a progressive tax. Remove the cap. Reduce the age to the youngest age that can be justified by the massive increase in funding.

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
5. "Extend Soc Sec to those age 50, is a start."
Mon Dec 16, 2013, 07:16 PM
Dec 2013

That will just mean less and less money paid INTO Social Security. So, unless the cap is raised at the same time, lowering the age to 50 will either bankrupt the fund or cause payments to drop all across the board, which would be disastrous to the current recipients and not too good for the economy. As far as I can tell.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What the GOP knows and Bi...