General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhat the GOP knows and Big ED doesn't. It's structural, There are no jobs.
This is why they are forgoing any extension of jobless benefits.. The GOP understand that Cyber-era productivity does not produce enough jobs for our population.
So their position is simply not to throw good money at this problem. It will not get them any votes or produce any solution.
Extent Soc Sec to those age 50, is a start.
mucifer
(23,559 posts)The cat's out of the bag now. The laws changed decades ago and greed is king.
CK_John
(10,005 posts)It's technology not people moving.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)Obama wanted. Of course that money would go to labor and manufacturing and not the Wall Street banksters and oil billionaires which is why the Repukes don't want it.
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)and Wall St wants to buy ALL the infrastructure and do it on the CHEAP.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)to make sure nobody else does either. It's time to start bringing them down. It will take the Atty General to do it though and I don't think he will.
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)We've got to run folks from the Progressive Wing to run in primaries and WIN there.
CK_John
(10,005 posts)Also construction has become highly automated.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)clean energy. That seems like more jobs to me. The steel needs to be made and parts manufactured so that will provide manufacturing jobs if our stupid Congress doesn't give the business to China.
CK_John
(10,005 posts)upaloopa
(11,417 posts)fund infrastructure repair and build new infrastructure. The idea was called infrastructure bank.
The repubs will not let it happen
All jobs are not systems related.
Taitertots
(7,745 posts)If Obama spent money and caused a recovery, it would be the death of the Republican party for 20 years.
That said....
Turn the SS tax from a regressive tax, into a progressive tax. Remove the cap. Reduce the age to the youngest age that can be justified by the massive increase in funding.
djean111
(14,255 posts)That will just mean less and less money paid INTO Social Security. So, unless the cap is raised at the same time, lowering the age to 50 will either bankrupt the fund or cause payments to drop all across the board, which would be disastrous to the current recipients and not too good for the economy. As far as I can tell.