Update - News Break - Judge issues Order in "Haas v Romney" that's telltale!
He who has eyes to see and cares how integrity be;
look and consider - why I'm a happy me!
http://petters-fraud.com/dec18_2013_court_deny_fed_marshal_service.pdf
Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS ORDER Denying Plaintiff’s Request for Service by United States Marshal
Plaintiff asks the Court to order the United States Marshal to effect service on the ten defendants named in his First Amended Complaint. [Dkt 7.] Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(c)(3) provides: “At the plaintiff’s request, the court may order that service be made by a United States marshal or deputy marshal or by a person specially appointed by the court. The court must so order if the plaintiff is authorized to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 or as a seaman under 28 U.S.C. § 1916.” (emphasis added). Plaintiff is neither a seaman nor a pauper. Having read the First Amended Complaint, plaintiff’s additional pleading entitled “Racketeering Civil Preliminary Rico Case Statement 1st Edition Part A,” and plaintiff’s Request for Service [Dkts 6, 7, 8], the Court finds no reason to depart from the general rule that “[t]he plaintiff is responsible for having the summons and complaint served within the time allowed by Rule 4(m) and must furnish the necessary copies to the person who makes service.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(1). See generally 4A Charles Alan Wright & Arthur R. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 1090 (3d ed. 2002)
emphasis added
[br][hr][br]
UPDATE - 1
BACKGROUND
Mitt Romney was CEO of Bain Capital in 2001; when eToys public company and federal bankruptcy estate was robbed (fraudulently) by Bain. This is one of the main reasons why he claims to be "retroactively" retired from August 2001 (after they offered me a bribe to become his partner and I reported the crime).
It has taken a dozen years to get here;
but they are now in serious harm's way!
Here's the "Preliminary RICO Case Statement" that the judge "acknowledge's" reading.
[br][hr][hr][br]
UPDATE - 2- The criminal issues at hand!
Someone is going to jail!
Toys R Us (owned by Bain) is in possession of the stolen property of eToys
[
In a CIVIL Racketeering case, one need only provide proof by "preponderance of the level" (the 3 standards in order of strength of facts, evidence, proof required are - beyond all reasonable doubt, clear and convincing and preponderance of"
-
Additionally, I only need to provide proof that Romney "indirectly" benefited (though he DID directly benefit);
and that's REAL easy to do - because the jerk bragged he gets millions each year from Bain.
Clawbacks are Hell - and Pitten's WILL get clawed!
[br][hr][br]
This whistleblower turned down a bribe from Mitt Romney's gang and reported them to the Department of Justice in 2001 (during the eToys bankruptcy case). Instead of arresting the fraudsters - the Dept. of [IN]Justice rallied its support of Organized Crime (probably in the hopes of doing a POTUS wannabe a favor and get rewarded when Romney handpicked that "friendly" U.S. Attorney General that Sheldon Adelson was putting up $100 million to buy).
[br]
the Organized Crooks (Racketeers) - want you to let them OFF totally 'Scott Free'!
And that Ain't Right!
FACTS NOT in DISPUTE
- - - Yours truly is a victim of organized crime. And, mind you, not just any ordinary efforts in syndicated felony law breaking; but that of/by non other than Willard Mitt Romney ("Romney"
and his Racketeering GANG. Most have forgotten the fact that Mitt is an attorney at law from Harvard.
Whereas, yours we (eToys shareholders & I) alleged -Romney has a Gang (see list of co-conspirators below) -
Romney became powerful and rich as a corporate raider;
- - - - - - - - - - and did so Illegally!
Because there's much money to be made defending the likes of Mitt; there are many an attorney, troll, stalwart, brown-nosier and other types of detractors/naysayers - who are all too willing to come out and say
"Hey - Pitten's is just a corporate raider who is ruthless and rich.
- - - - - There's nothing against the law of being a corporate raider ruthless".
Bull {c}hit is still manure - no matter how you spell and/or slice the cow pie!
Everyone is already aware that Romney lied about his tenure as Chief Executive Officer ("CEO"
of Bain Capital. What most are not aware of - are the real reasons WHY the POTUS wannabe claims to be "retroactively" retired from Bain Capital in August 2001; back to February 11, 1999.
- - - -to the ENTIRE Country about when he was CEO of Bain Capital
- - - - - upon his federal election campaign finance form (Office of Government Ethics {"OGE"} 278 Form)?
[br]
Racketeering Co-Conspirators of Romney's
Yours Truly has the answers to why Mitt lied upon his OGE Campaign Finance 278 Form.
The (REAL) reasons are are;
- Paul Traub
- Traub's "TBF" law firm
- Barry Gold (Traub's partner)
- Michael Glazer (whom Gold & Traub worked with)
- Greg Werkheiser (a partner of MNAT)
- Colm Connolly (MNAT partner who became U.S. Attorney)
- Goldman Sachs (a client of MNAT)
- Morris Nichols ("MNAT"
- Bain Capital (also a Client of MNAT)
- The Learning Company (Merged by MNAT with Mattel)
- Stage Stores (owned by Romney, who hired Michael Glazer, whom Barry Gold worked for with Traub)
- Kay Bee (CEO was Michael Glazer)
- eToys (MNAT as eToys counsel, Traub's TBF eToys creditors counsel,)
- Barry Gold (Traub's confessed partner) became illegal CEO of eToys
- MNAT, Traub and Barry Gold all lied about their links to Romney/Glazer/Bain/Kay bee
- Glazer/Kay Bee - bought eToys (for Romney when he was CEO of Bain)
- Barry Gold, MNAT and Traub did - ILLEGALLY - reduce the prices to Romney/Bain/Glazer/Kay Bee
[br]
It is a FACT that all of those parties are connected to each other; as per Court Docket Record Affidavits and Confessions. It is NOT in dispute that Barry Gold and Paul Traub are partners in Asset Disposition Advisors ("ADA"
. It is CONFESSED (see U.S. Trustee Disgorge Motion of Traub's TBF for $1.6 million dollars {here} AND - Wall Street Journal July 25, 2005 article "eToys investors claims conflicts at law firm" .
In parts 19 & 35 of the Disgorge Motion - Federal Police (U.S. Trustee) - notes parties were "forewarned".
The United States Supreme Court did RE-open a previously closed case for YEARS - of In re Hazel Atlas Glass v Hartford Empire and concluded that there are NO Statute of Limitations for Fraud on the Court by Officers of the Court.
Hartford was (eventually) punished for the fraud it did nine (9) years earlier; and the U.S. Supreme set the standard in Hazel Atlas that the Disgorge Motion reiterates appropriately the fact (in part 29) - correctly that -
{T}ampering with the administration of justice in the manner indisputably shown here involves far more than an injury to a single litigant. It is a wrong against the institutions set up to protect and safeguard the public, institutions in which fraud cannot complacently be tolerated consistently with the good order of society. Surely it cannot be that preservation of the integrity of the judicial process must always wait upon the diligence of litigants. The public welfare demands that the agencies of public justice be not so impotent that they must always be mute and helpless victims of deception and fraud.
[br][hr][br]
FELONY Crimes by Romney & his RICO Gang
Rico Case Law:
The defendants constitute an illegal enterprise in acts or threat of acts in violation of the Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organizations ("RICO"
Act of 1970. The LAW is United States Code Title 18 with Sections, 1961-1968.
One only needs two (2) separate (specific 18 U.S.C. 1961 "predicate acts"
The following are particular violations; of an RICO Section 1961 "predicate acts";
which - by the way - also includes Bankruptcy Frauds!
18 USC 241: Conspiracy against Rights of Citizens:
18 USC 3: Accessory after the fact, knowing that an offense has been
committed against the United States, relieves, receives, comforts or assists
the offender in order to hinder or prevent his apprehension, trial or punishment.
18 USC 242: Deprivation of Rights color of law of rights protected under the
Constitution of the U.S.
18 USC 512: Tampering with a witness
18 USC 1341: Mail fraud
18 USC 1343: Wire fraud
18 USC 1503: Obstruction of justice
18 USC 1510: Obstructing of criminal investigation
18 USC 1513: Retaliating against a witness, victim or informant
18 USC 1951: Interference with interstate commerce
18 USC 1621: Perjury
18 USC 1001: Fraud
[br][hr][br]
Federal (Civil) RICO cases are also permitted to review issues of individual "STATE" Felony violations;
as long as they carry more than one (1) year in prison - upon conviction.
[br][hr][br]
SUMMING it UP!
Mitt Romney and his RICO Gang already - ARE - guilty;
because they've confessed to 35 crimes in the eToys federal case.
However,
they were not held accountable for their culpability;
because of the federal corruption of Colm F Connolly!
This plaintiff's case against Romney, is still going forward (thus far);
and - over the next few weeks - I've got a plan to shove the facts up any stalwarts butt.
They are counting on the fact that you'll fall asleep when I quote the Law. It is rather easy for them to point out the fact that "hey, the guy didn't even graduate high school - he simply does NOT understand the Law".
Bull {c}hit is still manure;
no matter who says otherwise.
Could AL Capone "retroactively" escape his acts of organized crimes?
- - - - - - - Of course NOT!
Neither should Mitt - the PITTs - Romney.
Over the next several weeks, I'm going to file - in federal court - the proofs of Romney's RICO/Gang issues of Organized Crimes. By only posting one item at a time. Then the trolls, attorneys at law, stalwarts, naysayers and all who believe it is okay to betray a client - - will only have one thing to attack.
- - - - - - - - -As it now appears tha- the Truth will stop Romney's Gang from being "Scot Free"!
[br][hr][br]
[br][hr][br]
What the wonderful Mr. Reich has not detailed; because he and I have not spoken about it - is the criminal elements of Mitt Romney's gain of super quick wealth. It is there, black and white, for everyone to see (and news stories are about to come out about it in January).
The 3rd Circuit Court (which is over eToys by the way) and Congress - have affirmed a certain bad faith element can rear its ugly head; and that is an "association in fact" also/known/as a "Bankruptcy Ring".
Obviously, Congress was well aware that rigging of the U.S. Bankruptcy system is problematic. The Law making arm of our nation’s government built-in the Bankruptcy Fraud statutes §§ 152 thru 156 (“predicate acts”) as part of the Racketeering Felonies of 18 USC § 1961.
Due, in part, to the hubris of Romney and his Bankruptcy Ring believing his POTUS quest would succeed; there’s a vast evidence trail full of rock-solid date/ time stamped Bankruptcy Fraud violations. Compliance of the specificity/particularity requisites of Fed.R.Civ.P 9(b) are therefore freely achieved.
= new reply since forum marked as read
and such; but don't back it up with any facts.
MNAT stands for Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell (Romney/Bain and Goldman Sachs law firm)
http://www.mnat.com
What happen is MNAT lied to the Delaware Bankruptcy Court to hide the fact that they work for Goldman Sachs and Bain Capital. Goldman Sachs took eToys public (but stole hundreds of millions in doing so) (See NY Times March 2013 OpEd story "Rigging the IPO Game"
When an attorney confesses lying under oath (as MNAT did about Goldman Sachs - see deposition confession here). Then they are supposed to be disqualified. But the court said, it was too late; because the case is closed (she said that in October 2005). It was against the Law to be arbitrary & capricious (it is actually called "Color of Law" - a Civil Rights violation).
Judge wrote in the same Opinion that it would be wrong to Punish a plaintiff and reward conflict attorneys;
but (AFTER) MNAT confessed lying - the court accepted a forgery from MNAT (who was also my lawyer by court order).
MNAT told the court (again AFTER it confessed lying) that yours truly "waived" my companies right to be paid ($3.7 million). The court accepted the forgery and then told me I was dismissed - with prejudice (because everyone BELIEVED Romney would become POTUS and hire the "friendly" USAG that Sheldon Adelson wanted).
These Laser haters like to gang up on the victim and protect the bad guys right to do same.
Anyone who actually believes I waived my right to be paid the best payday of my life
Please raise your hand?
All you need to know are simple facts IN THE RECORD
(especially if you are in the legal profession - as it doth appear).
In re Middleton Arms is ubiquitous (and just affirmed by 9th Cir in Anwar)
Controlling is In re Hazel Atlas (and both the UST and Chief Justice Opines cite In re Hazel Atlas)
[hr]
With that background, MNAT confessed lying under oath 15 times to hide its connection to Goldman Sachs (who took eToys public and made $200 million plus vanish) (See NY Times "Rigging IPO Game" .
Middleton commands that MNAT be disqualified;
but the US Trustee stipulated to the 3rd Circuit in its 1st footnote of case 07-2360
We have not and will not address MNAT issues
Here's MNAT's confession about Goldman Sachs in a deposition
http://petters-fraud.com/MNAT_deposition_Feb9_2005.pdf
[hr]
While benefiting from its 15 acts of PERJURY about Goldman Sachs, MNAT nominated Paul Traub's firm to prosecute Goldman Sachs. WHEN DOES Capone's law firm get to personally HAND pick who prosecutes Capone?
NEVER!
[hr]
Goldman Sachs took eToys public and perpetrated $200 million fraud, MNAT just signed a settlement with Goldman of $7 million for that fraud - AFTER - MNAT (while benefiting from PERJURY) asked for (in the very beginning the case) and RECEIVED permission to DESTROY the books & records of eToys
http://petters-fraud.com/MNAT_Motion_Destruction_Books_n_Records.pdf
When can Capone's counsel LIE to a court to represent a victim of Capone;
and then be able to DESTROY evidence (obstruct justice)
NEVER
[hr]
Paul Traub's firm suffered a Motion to Disgorge for $1.6 million
http://petters-fraud.com/DisgorgeMotion_TBF_1_6_Million.pdf
In parts 19 & 35 of that Disgorge Motion, the U.S. Trustee stipulates that
the parties were forewarned IN ADVANCE - not to violate the law;
hence the (clandestine) violation is extensively heinous and egregious.
In part 18 - the U.S. Trustee points out the fact that Traub CONFESSED
his TBF firm "intentionally" permitted the Lies to stand before the court
WHICH IS - Deliberate Fraud on the Court by an Officer of the Court
Finally - on this part - the Disgorge Motion concludes in part 35;
that a FRAUD on the COURT occurred!
(without - Mind You - the knowledge/dealing with 300 other crimes we now know)
[br]
[hr]
But the DE Bankruptcy Court ignores the law (and such precedents as In re Brady/In re Giglio)
and said (in its PUBLISHED Opinion of October 4, 2005)
that it is TOO late to address these issues; because the case is now over.
Abuse of discretion massive;
and the case is STILL open ( 8 years later)
[hr]
Finally - the CLI contracts that the stalwart perversely attempts to utilize;
also has a corresponding ORDER that MNAT was to submit CLI's fee and expenses to the court.
Hence, Capone's counsel helped Capone by tossing Eliot Ness out;
with a forgery that claims Eliot Ness's company simply Waived $3.7 million in fees and expense
Doing so AFTER Capone's counsel confessed to lying under oath 15 times
With NO quid pro quo for the $3.7 million.
ANYONE who believes that I simply "Waived" my right to the biggest payday of my life
after making MNAT"s OTHER secret client pay $50 million instead of $5 million
(which - by the way - MNAT helped reduce BACK to the $5 million)
PLEASE - by all means - Raise your hand?
[br][hr][br]
OH - and by the way - my contracts GUARANTEE legal fees;
but no one will take the case to claim them
even when there's confessions of fraud and perjury
with the final caveat that the Court Approved Contracts also contain
INDEMNIFICATION clauses that my CLI entity is indemnified against willful misconduct and negligence of eToys, its agents, its assigns and representatives;
BUT MNAT stipulated to the court that CLI never asked to be indemnified;
through its approved counsel
WHICH IS MNA f--king T
these threads are mildly amusing, tho.
Sid
My CLI controlled eToys (not KB)
- except for the lawyers (who confessed they deceived the court by false affdavits)
I was there for the entire year of 2001 (until they illegally inserted Barry Gold)
Only one full of bull - spots bull - CLI was represented by counsel all the way from 2001 till August 2005;
which was AFTER the opposing parties Confessed lying under oath (intentionally) to the court.
And my contracts guaranteed legal fees.
It what (legitimate) process does an attorney quit a job guaranteed to be paid $1 million;
especially when the opposing party confessed to 34 acts of PERJURY?
Again - wrong on personal filing. My attorneys violated the law and refused to inform the court of the frauds.
ONLY a stalwart that likes to see Goldman Sachs, Bain and Romney get away with fraud
approves of the crooks - Getting away with Fraud.
The Law Firms Confessed!
your such a "genius" with your puffpiece
Yes, no doubt they were in on the conspiracy as well.
This was your contract:
Services. CLI agrees to provide Collateral maintenance and liquidation services to eToys, including establishment and oversight of appropriate security measures and other controls at the Warehouses and corporate offices of eToys, confirmation and inventory counting, oversight of Collateral transfers and removals by purchasers thereof, and other related activities designed to maintain and liquidate the Collateral in an organized, secure, and professional manner (the "Services"
...as was pointed out before you got the heave-ho from DailyKos.
are you defending romshit? 
you're referring to, is trying to shed some light on malfeasance concerning Romshit. If he's a vulture(your term) he's my type of vulture because at least he's trying to shed light on a true vulture of amerikan capitalism. And yeah Bush needs to be in prison for KILLING babies by the thousands. That is fact. Or is that fantasy?
and I have the same opinion of that one as I do of your assertions. You and that one rate 0 in my book. Have a good one. I'm done with you. I hope romshit ends up serving time. Won't happen cause he's a 1%er and everyone knows they aren't held accountable.
bye.
fried crow in lard, I hope.
And I'm still standing!
Overjoyed - actually!
There is a thread about knitting out of one's vagina, you should drop your case and spend time learning about that 
Sid
wouldn't make no never mind which. But being a member of the elite 1% of american aristocracy, doubt it.
of vulture capitalism. You're my type of thorn. Keep sticking them.
YES!
It was abuse of discretion for the U.S. Trustee to Breach their Fiduciary Duty (under "Color of Law" so that they would NOT see to it that Goldman Sachs, Bain Capital, Mitt Romney (and his gang of attorney thugs) - weren't prosecuted.
The FBI "Color of Law" website stipulates that;
.“Color of law” simply means that the person is using authority given to him or her by a local, state, or federal government agency
[br][hr][br]
--- Also, it is horrendous abuse of discretion for the Chief Justice to punish yours truly (for blowing the whistle) and allow the vault robbers to keep the keys of the case they are robbing openly (without any need for remorse or relent). Her Honor stated in her very own Opinion (page 50 to 52) that NO Perjury was documented and therefore she would NOT refer the matter to the U.S. Attorney's office. The court also states on page 16 about the right to address fraud more than one year later would;
{S}erve to penalize the [Plaintiff] for delay that was beyond his control
and to reward conflicted attorneys for failing to disclose their conflicts
And yet, here we are - I'm penalized
and the conflicted attorneys are being rewarded.
Rooting for you 
Very MUCH!
I was looking at the Muckety web tool and this is where I stopped because, well, too much info too late at night!!
So...
http://www.muckety.com/Toys-R-Us/5003367.muckety
In case you wanted to poke around.
Good Luck with your endeavor!
there are instructions and ways to save the maps. I wonder if there's an interface that makes charts or whatever from the maps. Might be worth looking in to. I'm sort of a novice with it, sometimes I can't figure out the search engine!
I also wonder if there's some other Muckety-like tool that makes those image charts..,
