General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsConscientious Objectors Needed Now More Than Ever
http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/20827-conscientious-objectors-needed-now-more-than-everConscientious Objectors Needed Now More Than Ever
Tuesday, 24 December 2013 11:43
By Ken Butigan, Waging Nonviolence | Op-Ed
In our present age of permanent war, it is almost impossible to recall a time when armed conflicts clearly began and ended. In that ancient, bygone era say, before 2003 one could judiciously ruminate on an impending war before it got rolling and make a choice about it. Most people, even then, didnt see it that way for them there was no choice. If the government said, War jump to it, invariably most of us said, How high? whether that meant picking up a gun, plunking down our taxes, or throwing our full spiritual and political weight behind it. It seemed automatic and inevitable and foreordained. Choice, it seemed, had nothing to do with it at all.
But there was a choice, and some took it seriously. And even today, when war is on a dizzying spin-cycle whirling with such tremendous velocity that it virtually disappears before our very eyes and when the ever-expanding remote-control battlefield increasingly exceeds every horizon we still have a choice. Groping our way back to such a decision-point is crucial. Though it will be different than before a choice made in the midst of the 24/7 careening, never-ending centrifugal spin and not amid the more contemplative lull that we once were afforded before all hell would break loose this choice must be rescued and learned and applied, given the Pentagon and the NSAs monotonously relentless planning. What better teachers do we have than those who seized this opportunity in the past? Who better than those who chose?
History is chock full of conscientious objection, though it sometimes takes some hunting around to glimpse it. Violence and injustice and what is more violent and unjust than war? often prompts an equal and opposite reaction, from lone individual figures to whole communities, like those of the historical peace churches, including the Mennonites and the Quakers. In virtually no case is this easy. Pacifist religious groupings, where one can feel nurtured and supported in the scandalous belief that killing is wrong, ultimately prepare their members to pay up, as Daniel Berrigan the Jesuit priest and activist who was imprisoned for his resistance to the Vietnam War and has been conscientiously objecting ever since once pithily described it. To hold stubbornly to such a belief in a society where killing is a matter of policy means there are often bound to be consequences.
This is what happened on the eve of World War II. Some 37,000 men facing the first peacetime draft in U.S. history chose to become conscientious objectors, or COs. Many of them though not all were members of peace churches who, fearing what happened to their young men who faced torture in U.S. prisons when they resisted induction during the First World War, negotiated the creation of an alternative: Civilian Public Service, which came into being on Dec. 19, 1940 73 years ago today virtually a year before the attack on Pearl Harbor.
tomg
(2,574 posts)a CO from 1970, this is a great way to start Christmas. Peace on Earth, Good Will to All.
FailureToCommunicate
(14,020 posts)is the way.
panader0
(25,816 posts)The Sgt asked me my religion. I said none, I just don't want to kill people I don't know for reasons I don't believe in.
He chuckled and denied it.
former9thward
(32,073 posts)What is the point to being a CO? Just don't join.
tomg
(2,574 posts)have become conscientious objectors, or applied for that status. This became a fairly strong movement as soldiers in Iraq became more aware. Additionally, males between the ages of 18 and 26 still have to register for Selective Service. I suggest that when they do, they do so either under protest or ask to file a claim as a Conscientious Objector. They will be told that they are to do that in the event that they are called up or if a draft is reinstated; however, at least they will have made a written statement.
Still, one of the points the article implied, I think, is that in the current age, there are different elements of conscientious objection. In some cases, it is not simply not going, but it is also offering resistance. In other cases, the motives is to bear witness.