Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Proud Public Servant

(2,097 posts)
Fri Dec 27, 2013, 10:54 AM Dec 2013

How tied is this Administration to banksters? Read it and weep.

Seriously, if you won't go after Bernie Madoff's co-conspirators, who will you go after?

Bernard Madoff’s principal bank, JPMorgan Chase, has for years obstructed federal bank examiners trying to ascertain what it knew about his gigantic Ponzi scheme, an official document obtained by Newsweek shows.

The Justice Department refused in September to back up Treasury inspector general staff who wanted a court order to enforce a subpoena, in effect shielding JPMorgan from law enforcement, the October 8 document shows.

The Justice Department told the Treasury Inspector General “that they were denying the request for enforcement of the subpoena,” which means officials “could not undertake further actions regarding this matter,” wrote Jason J. Metrick, the inspector general special-agent-in-charge.

The memo revealing that Justice protected JPMorgan from an obstruction complaint raises anew questions about how much the Obama administration has done to protect the big banks, whose lies about mortgage securities and other investments they sold sank the economy in 2008.


http://www.newsweek.com/jpmorgan-doesnt-want-talk-about-bernie-madoff-225067

35 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How tied is this Administration to banksters? Read it and weep. (Original Post) Proud Public Servant Dec 2013 OP
And we are already being urged to line up behind woo me with science Dec 2013 #1
Urged? More like bludgeoned. I and the rest of DU will vote. Good luck Doctor_J Dec 2013 #3
Some progressives chose not to Le Taz Hot Dec 2013 #9
+1 "Voting for a Third-Way candidate is no better than voting for a Republican" L0oniX Dec 2013 #12
+ 1 n/t MissDeeds Dec 2013 #21
"Sea-Change" Because of "See-No-Change" n/t fredamae Dec 2013 #26
They don't even bother to give lip service to the liberals any more Doctor_J Dec 2013 #27
What exactly ProSense Dec 2013 #2
Hey, man, don't be gettin' in the way of the Grand Narrative. byronius Dec 2013 #13
A few more disturbing snips from the article: KoKo Dec 2013 #4
Obama and his bankster staff Ichingcarpenter Dec 2013 #5
Larry Summers and Obama. See any smoke? L0oniX Dec 2013 #8
holder is absolutely worthless frylock Dec 2013 #18
Are you kidding me? zeemike Dec 2013 #29
Yet another indication it's time to break up the big banks. pa28 Dec 2013 #25
wall street criminals are too big to prosecute doncha know nt msongs Dec 2013 #6
Just like BushCo MissDeeds Dec 2013 #22
This is a Third Way president. Le Taz Hot Dec 2013 #7
The country will turn into a cabal of mega corporations which is where it's headed now. L0oniX Dec 2013 #11
Agree that we're a cabal, Le Taz Hot Dec 2013 #14
Goldman Sachs = metaphor, "bloody violent revolt?" as in "let them eat cake" style. L0oniX Dec 2013 #15
I'm a simple-minded broad. Le Taz Hot Dec 2013 #17
A Gandhi type approach is the only thing that will work. zeemike Dec 2013 #30
From the beginning. Autumn Dec 2013 #10
How many bu$h installed people are still in the Obama Justice Department? RC Dec 2013 #16
Because people didn't vote for Change. jsr Dec 2013 #20
Oh but we did, in mass! RC Dec 2013 #23
"There was little of the usual Administrative house cleaning when Obama was sworn in." Enthusiast Dec 2013 #34
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Dec 2013 #19
Dimon invited Obama to the White House for lunch to receive JPM's employee of the month award. pa28 Dec 2013 #24
Unrec for typical NeoDU, clueless, half-truth, 180 degrees out-of-whack Obama bashing. nt tridim Dec 2013 #28
Rec for good old DU holding their feet to the fire activism! Scuba Dec 2013 #31
Another Recommend! KoKo Dec 2013 #32
I have said it before and will say it again, Obama works for the truedelphi Dec 2013 #33
Recommended 1000X and kicked too. Enthusiast Dec 2013 #35
 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
3. Urged? More like bludgeoned. I and the rest of DU will vote. Good luck
Fri Dec 27, 2013, 11:26 AM
Dec 2013

getting the indies, undecideds, and young people out.

Le Taz Hot

(22,271 posts)
9. Some progressives chose not to
Fri Dec 27, 2013, 12:11 PM
Dec 2013

vote for Sen. Obama in 2008 as they saw, rightly, that he was a "centrist." MANY more chose not to vote for him in 2012 as he continued Bush policy after Bush policy and showing NO acknowledgement of progressive issues. The Establishment Third-Way Democrats seem to think the "shut up and vote" strategy will work indefinitely. It won't. There's a sea change happening and, as has historically been the case, the 1% and their bought-and-paid-for politicians are the last to figure it out.

Voting for a Third-Way candidate is no better than voting for a Republican. We need to demand better and refuse their "inevitable" corporate candidates.

 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
27. They don't even bother to give lip service to the liberals any more
Fri Dec 27, 2013, 01:52 PM
Dec 2013

"TPP is a major priority for the president"

He actually hasn't supported a single leftist issue in 5 years. I blame Reid and Pelosi too. The only function liberals serve now is to be blamed when DINOs lose at the polls.

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
2. What exactly
Fri Dec 27, 2013, 11:25 AM
Dec 2013

"How tied is this Administration to banksters? Read it and weep."

...does this have to do with the administration being "tied" to bankers? I mean, the piece is about an IG inquiry and some back and forth between the DOJ and the SEC. Then the author throws in this:

Justice said the law applies to the bank examiners, not to the IG inquiry into JPMorgan’s obstruction of the bank examiners. A Justice Department spokesman declined to say why Justice would not seek a court order enforcing the subpoena.

The memos Justice is helping JPMorgan conceal might also shed light on how the Securities and Exchange Commission failed to uncover the decades-long scam, despite audits and warnings from Harry Markopolos, the Boston fraud investigator who tried in vain to get an official investigation.

Eric Swanson, a lawyer who oversaw one of the SEC audits, married a Madoff niece in a 2007 wedding that Madoff attended. The SEC inspector general earlier said it looked into this, but found nothing amiss.

What does this have to do with the administration? This guy worked for the SEC until 2006, which the piece doesn't mention. The aspect of the case was screwed up by the SEC long before Obama took office.

Swanson worked at the Securities and Exchange Commission as a lawyer from 1996 to 2006, rising to the level of Assistant Director of the Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations. Subsequently, he worked at Ameriprise Financial as Vice President of Regulatory Strategy.

Swanson is married to Shana Madoff, who worked at the firm of her uncle Bernard Madoff as a rules and compliance officer and attorney until it was closed when the multi-billion-dollar Madoff investment scandal was uncovered. Swanson met Shana Madoff originally when he was conducting an SEC examination of whether Bernie Madoff was running a Ponzi scheme.

<...>

Following a period of time in which he practiced non-securities-related law, Swanson worked at the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) as a lawyer from August 1996 to 2006, other than a brief period in 1999 when he worked for Knight Securities.[1][5] While at the SEC, he received in August 2004 a Capital Markets Award, related to work in the area of SEC examinations of conflicts of interest.[4] At the end of his tenure, he was Assistant Director of the Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations, head of the SEC's inspection program responsible for regulatory oversight of trading on the securities exchanges and ECNs, supervising 8–18 staffers.[1][5][6]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eric_Swanson

Many of Maddoff's co-conspirators have been prosecuted since 2009.

Two Former Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC Employees Charged with Conspiracy, Securities Fraud and Tax Crimes
http://www.stopfraud.gov/news/news-11182010.html

Estate of Jeffry M. Picower to Forfeit $7.2 Billion for Victims of Bernard L. Madoff’s Ponzi Scheme
http://www.stopfraud.gov/news/news-12172010.html

Peter Madoff, Former Chief Compliance Officer and Senior Managing Director at Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC, Pleads Guilty in New York to Securities Fraud and Tax Fraud Conspiracy
http://www.stopfraud.gov/iso/opa/stopfraud/NYS-1206291.html

byronius

(7,395 posts)
13. Hey, man, don't be gettin' in the way of the Grand Narrative.
Fri Dec 27, 2013, 12:28 PM
Dec 2013

He's EVIL. He serves THE DEVIL. Let's just throw stuff at him and see if it might STICK.

We don't deserve this president. And when he's gone, we're all going to miss him, 'cause there ain't nobody like him in the pipeline.

'But I heerd he kicked a dog once. I think it was on the Blaze, but it might be true. He's just plain EVIL. I kin just sense it.'

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
4. A few more disturbing snips from the article:
Fri Dec 27, 2013, 11:54 AM
Dec 2013
Only minor players have been prosecuted, in contrast with the more than 3,000 felony convictions the FBI says it obtained in the much smaller savings and loan scandals two decades ago.

JPMorgan was the principal bank Madoff used in his fraud. On the day of his arrest in December 2008, he claimed to be the world’s biggest money manager, handling $64.8 billion of other people’s money, half as much as JPMorgan itself and almost as much as Goldman Sachs and George Soros combined.

and this:

Last March Attorney General Eric Holder told a Senate hearing he was afraid to prosecute the Too Big to Fail Banks, as it could do even more economic damage, in effect declaring them Too Big to Prosecute.

“The size of some of these institutions becomes so large that it does become difficult for us to prosecute them when we are hit with indications that if you do prosecute, if you do bring a criminal charge, it will have a negative impact on the national economy -- perhaps even the world economy," Holder testified.

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
5. Obama and his bankster staff
Fri Dec 27, 2013, 12:00 PM
Dec 2013

The Wall Streeters Obama loves most
The president may call them "fat cats" in public, but far too many of his closest advisors are former bankers


http://www.salon.com/2012/01/23/the_wall_streeters_obama_loves_most/

https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2009/04/pers-a06.html

Its sort of old news really when Larry Summers was brought aboard right after the first election.

zeemike

(18,998 posts)
29. Are you kidding me?
Fri Dec 27, 2013, 02:06 PM
Dec 2013

He is worth his weight in gold...literaly.
If you are a criminal bankster...you can do the crime with no chance of doing the time.

pa28

(6,145 posts)
25. Yet another indication it's time to break up the big banks.
Fri Dec 27, 2013, 01:42 PM
Dec 2013

Even the American Enterprise Institute thinks it time. Too big to fail is too big to exist and yet we refuse to take action.

Le Taz Hot

(22,271 posts)
7. This is a Third Way president.
Fri Dec 27, 2013, 12:03 PM
Dec 2013

I wouldn't have expected anything different. We have a chance in 2014 and 2016 to begin to replace these Third-Way sellouts and to replace the TeaKlanner batshit crazy congresscritters. We DESPERATELY need to get smart, sane progressives in their place.

 

L0oniX

(31,493 posts)
11. The country will turn into a cabal of mega corporations which is where it's headed now.
Fri Dec 27, 2013, 12:17 PM
Dec 2013

It's a joke to even be thinking you can vote Goldman Sachs out of office. A Gandhi type approach will not work either IMO. Passiveness is what they want. A bloody violent revolt is the only way to fix this ...as world history shows. What we see is a major flaw in the democratic system where voting can't be a means of self correction. The US Constitution and or Declaration of Human Rights should have had something in them to guard against greed.

Le Taz Hot

(22,271 posts)
14. Agree that we're a cabal,
Fri Dec 27, 2013, 12:31 PM
Dec 2013

disagree with the remainder.

First, Goldman Sachs is not involved in ALL races throughout the U.S. They're involved in the ones in which they have a direct interest, namely governorships, key Congressional seats and pretty much all Senate seats. That leaves all the rest. Secondly, money doesn't always buy the seat. A reminder that Meg Whitman outspent Jerry Brown by something like 3 to 1 and Brown still won. There are lots of examples of this. The lesson here is popularity (and populism) can beat out money.

As for passivity, I think I'm advocating exactly the opposite. I'm advocating activism. Direct, unrelenting activism. That is what the Founders left to us. If WE don't like our politicians then WE have the power to change (gerrymandering notwithstanding -- a whole other thread).

A "bloody violent revolt?" No thanks. I've no desire to see anyone killed or maimed. "Bloody violent revolts" tend to have horrendous unintended consequences and I want to part of it.

zeemike

(18,998 posts)
30. A Gandhi type approach is the only thing that will work.
Fri Dec 27, 2013, 02:16 PM
Dec 2013

And Gandhi was not passive, he was non violent...his approach was non cooperation with evil and civil disobedience which is not passive.
Any attempt at a violent revolution will be instantly crushed by a militarized police force and the all seeing eye of the NSA.

 

RC

(25,592 posts)
16. How many bu$h installed people are still in the Obama Justice Department?
Fri Dec 27, 2013, 12:45 PM
Dec 2013
The Justice Department refused in September to back up Treasury inspector general staff who wanted a court order to enforce a subpoena, in effect shielding JPMorgan from law enforcement, the October 8 document shows.


There was little of the usual Administrative house cleaning when Obama was sworn in. Why is that?

Enthusiast

(50,983 posts)
34. "There was little of the usual Administrative house cleaning when Obama was sworn in."
Sat Dec 28, 2013, 08:55 AM
Dec 2013

That was the first clue.

truedelphi

(32,324 posts)
33. I have said it before and will say it again, Obama works for the
Fri Dec 27, 2013, 07:49 PM
Dec 2013

Financial sector people that he "appoints" to office.

He worked for Geithner, with Geithner even announcing such a deal when he was off trying to sell our economic policies to European nations.

Of course now that Geithner has packed up and gone off to Citi, Obama works for Jack Lew.

And recently good ol' Chomsky is saying what a plutocracy our nation has become, with millions attempting to find work, while the stock market explodes.

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/12/27/noam-chomsky-were-no-longer-a-functioning-democracy-were-really-a-plutocracy/

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How tied is this Administ...