Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
Thu Jan 2, 2014, 10:37 PM Jan 2014

Federal judge rules Florida's mandatory drug tests for welfare unconstitutional.

Federal judge rules Fla. welfare drug testing law unconstitutional
Florida Gov. Rick Scott has promised to appeal the judge's ruling
Elias Isquith, Salon
Thursday, Jan 2, 2014 4:40 PM UTC

(Credit: AP Photo/Steve Cannon)

U.S. District Judge Mary Scriven ruled on Tuesday that Florida’s 2011 change to its welfare program, which mandates recipients undergo drug testing, violates the Fourth Amendment’s protection against unreasonable search and seizure and is thus unconstitutional.

In a scathing, 30-page decision, Scriven says “there is no set of circumstances under which the warrantless, suspicionless drug testing at issue in this case could be constitutionally applied.”
She went on to dismiss the arguments put forward by lawyers for the state, writing, “In sum, there simply is no competent evidence offered on this record of the sort of pervasive drug problem the State envisioned in the promulgation of this statute.”

Despite the setback, Florida’s Republican governor, Rick Scott, vowed to appeal Scriven’s ruling....

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Federal judge rules Florida's mandatory drug tests for welfare unconstitutional. (Original Post) woo me with science Jan 2014 OP
There goes Scott's cash cow if the appeal fails. GoCubsGo Jan 2014 #1
I applaud this decision. But do find it out of place. The government has been violating the rhett o rick Jan 2014 #2
+1 woo me with science Jan 2014 #4
Though many do not see the need of searches there are times this should happen. If one Thinkingabout Jan 2014 #3
 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
2. I applaud this decision. But do find it out of place. The government has been violating the
Thu Jan 2, 2014, 10:43 PM
Jan 2014

"unreasonable search and seizure" clause in almost everything. The TSA comes to mind, as do the state patrol traps, etc. We live in an oligarchical fascist country.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
3. Though many do not see the need of searches there are times this should happen. If one
Thu Jan 2, 2014, 10:57 PM
Jan 2014

Thinks it violates their Fourth Amendment rights then the same person has a right to avoid places which require searches. On the TSA when a ticket is purchased you have to agree to abide by the rules of the airline in which you travel, you don't have to purchase the ticket. I don't like the drug testing of those on welfare for different reasons. On employers testing employees again in most places of employment the right of the employer to do drug testing is a condition of employment.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Federal judge rules Flori...