General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOur Everyday Lives Have Been Financialized -- And It's Destructive
http://www.alternet.org/economy/finances-hold-our-everyday-life-must-be-brokenThe mature economies of the modern world, particularly the United States and Britain, are often described as "financialized." The term reflects the ascendancy of the financial sector. Even more important, it conveys the penetration of the financial system into every nook and cranny of society, including housing, education, health and other areas of life that were previously relatively immune.
Evidence that financialization represents a deep transformation of mature economies is offered by the global crisis of 2007-09. The crisis originated in the elephantine U.S. financial system, and was associated with speculation in housing. For a brief period it led to serious questioning of mainstream economic theory and policy: how to confront the turmoil, and what to do about the diseased financial system; are new economic theories needed? However, after six years it is clear that very little has changed. Financialization is here to stay.
Consider, for instance, the policies to confront the crisis. First, public funds were injected into banks to boost capital. Second, public liquidity was made available to banks to sustain their operations. Third, public interest rates were driven to zero to enable banks to make secure profits by lending to their own customers at higher rates.
This extraordinary public largesse towards private banks was matched by austerity and wage reductions for workers and households. As for restructuring finance, nothing fundamental has taken place. The behemoths that continue to dominate the global financial system operate in the knowledge that they enjoy an unspoken public guarantee. The unpalatable reality is that financialization will persist, despite its costs for society.
Laelth
(32,017 posts)The financial sector produces little or nothing of value. It takes wealth (in the form of ones and zeros in a computer) and turns it into more wealth while siphoning off a portion of that wealth to further enrich and grow itself (i.e. financial sector businesses and the people who work in them). That's not producing anything tangible. It's not truly "production" in the materialist sense. Instead, it represents a theft of the value of the real production going on in the rest of the economy. Most of the growth in the U.S. economy since 2001 has been in the financial sector. That means the real economy barely grew at all. The U.K. and the U.S. erred in the late 1990s by passing laws that encouraged the rapid growth of this vampire. Personally, I'd like to shrink the financial sector down to the size where we could drown it in a bathtub.
-Laelth
Thank you.
Laelth
(32,017 posts)-Laelth
H2O Man
(73,541 posts)hosted a small social gathering to celebrate the completion of what should become an important legal case involving public education in NYS. School teachers, social workers, and university students gathered here. One of our topics of discussion was, of course, the state's economy. Being the oldest, I was able to identify how, in the 1980s through '90s, the only two growth industries in our state were casinos and prisons. (I suspect there is a relationship between the two.) And how the "assembly" jobs from a large defense industry had gone from union jobs that paid $14 to 20 an hour, to prison labor, paying roughly 10 cents an hour.
JCMach1
(27,559 posts)that is all
bemildred
(90,061 posts)They have almost ALL the capital and are running out of things to invest it in, hence the urge to buy out lucrative government functions.
This also explains why stock prices are so high--with P.E. Ratios that my grandmother would have instantly rejected as evidence of an over-priced stock. There's plenty of capital laying around to invest but very little with guaranteed returns to invest in.
-Laelth
bemildred
(90,061 posts)LisaLynne
(14,554 posts)and is unsustainable. They will keep taking until there is nothing else to take, but then what happens?
bemildred
(90,061 posts)Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)and economy, but to the very concept of America. Its reactions to economic events are completely counter-productive and thanks to decades of conservative idiocy, the more urgent the need, the less likely it will attract any capital.
In what world does this make sense? If a company is well run, pays its people well, has a strong customer base, reliable repeat business, and is profitable with no debt, it is a dog.
Take that same company, FUBAR its business model, give all the executives a huge payday, loot all the employee's funds, bury the company under insurmountable debt, fire all the good workers that know their jobs and the industry, and start ripping off your customers, and overnight the company becomes a strong buy.
Laelth
(32,017 posts)-Laelth
Zorra
(27,670 posts)And that is not just a slogan.
You're working for capitalism. Is capitalism working for you?
xchrom
(108,903 posts)were really just about being able to live.
they were hijacked in some instances -- but a price increase in onions can cause civil unrest -- depending on where you are.
MisterP
(23,730 posts)every thought, every learning experience to its dollar value and turned into a portfolio element