Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
Mon Jan 6, 2014, 12:39 PM Jan 2014

The politics of paranoia

The politics of paranoia

By Steve Benen

It may be an obscure federal program, but the demise of the National Blueways System speaks to a larger pattern (thanks to my colleague Tricia McKinney for the heads-up).

A U.S. Interior Department program intended to recognize conservation efforts along the nation’s waterways was dissolved on Friday amid opposition from landowners and politicians who feared it would lead to increased regulations and possible land seizures.

The National Blueways System was created in May 2012 under President Barack Obama’s America’s Great Outdoors Initiative. The program was voluntary, didn’t include any new regulations, and a designation – bestowed on only two rivers, one of which was dropped last year because of local opposition – brought no additional funding.

The whole point of the program – really, the only point – was to recognize conservation efforts. The White River, for example, received the designation after the Missouri Department of Conservation and the Nature Conservancy recommended it for the honor. The Interior Department agreed, which again meant no new spending and no new regulations....last summer, Republican members of Congress from Arkansas and Missouri began complaining, asking the Interior Department how to revoke the designation. Why? Because conservatives, led in part by Sen. John Boozman (R-Arka.) believed the National Blueways System could force private landowners to cooperate with conservation efforts... there was nothing in the program that compelled anyone to do anything. But the right got paranoid and Republican members of Congress took that paranoia seriously.

What’s striking to me is how often stories like these pop up. A few months ago, for example, the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization decided to grant World Heritage status the Alamo, giving the Texas historical site the same status as other American treasures such as Independence Hall, the Grand Canyon, Yellowstone, and the Statue of Liberty. Conservatives freaked out, saying this meant the U.N. might seize control of the landmark.

This happens all the time, at every level of government. The U.S. Senate can’t ratify the Arms Trade Treaty because of delusional paranoia from the far-right, which Republican senators choose to take seriously. Congress won’t consider expanded background checks because of baseless paranoia about a “gun registry” that would not and cannot exist. Republicans killed a treaty on the rights of people with disabilities because of paranoid conspiracy theories with no basis in reality.

- more -

http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/the-politics-paranoia

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The politics of paranoia (Original Post) ProSense Jan 2014 OP
Kick for ProSense Jan 2014 #1
Fundamentalist Christians have always been against the UN. LisaLynne Jan 2014 #2
Republican should be listed as a treestar Jan 2014 #3

LisaLynne

(14,554 posts)
2. Fundamentalist Christians have always been against the UN.
Mon Jan 6, 2014, 01:50 PM
Jan 2014

I don't even think they actually know why. They have conflated the US as a country somehow with their religion to the point that the US working in any way with anything else is an attack on Jesus. The more the Republicans become nothing but fundamentalists, the more WTF will be produced, like this.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
3. Republican should be listed as a
Mon Jan 6, 2014, 02:00 PM
Jan 2014

Synonym for lunatic. The UN bit always cracks me up. Our sovereignty! Oh my!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The politics of paranoia