General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBecause It's Important: More Analysis of the Draft Environment Chapter of the TPP
From Michael Burns, ED, Sierra Club:
If the environment chapter is finalized as written in this leaked document, President Obamas environmental trade record would be worse than George W. Bushs. This draft chapter falls flat on every single one of our issues oceans, fish, wildlife, and forest protections and in fact, rolls back on the progress made in past free trade pacts.[b
From Professor Jane Kelsey of Aukland University, NZ:
"Australia, New Zealand the US and Canada were the four countries that voted against the adoption of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, which recognizes indigenous rights in relation to genetic resources and biodiversity.
Parties have divergent positions on Multilateral Environmental Agreements. The US has not signed the Convention on Biological Diversity and very few of the twelve countries have signed or ratified the subsequent Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilization. The US is also not a signatory to the Kyoto Protocol of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
http://dissenter.firedoglake.com/2014/01/15/a-public-relations-exercise-tpp-agreement-chapter-for-environment-released-by-wikileaks/
More from NRDC:
http://www.nrdc.org/media/2014/140115.asp
Let's recap: As written, the draft chapter provides exactly NO enforcement in any environmental area. None. Shark finning? Nope. Weird lotteries to slaughter endangered animals? Nope. Nothing, nothing and nothing. And the U.S. which has taken an extraordinarily tough stance on issues like intellectual property right, has been down right meek about environmental protection. We have a law that all trade agreements are supposed to adhere to, called the May 10th agreement. It's being ignored by the USTR.
Here's the May 10th Agreement
http://www.ustr.gov/sites/default/files/uploads/factsheets/2007/asset_upload_file127_11319.pdf
bananas
(27,509 posts)Thanks for the links, cali.
cali
(114,904 posts)I appreciate the heck out of people bothering to read my TPP threads.
dogknob
(2,431 posts)badtoworse
(5,957 posts)If the Asian trading partners get a pass on environmental regulations and we continue to enforce our own stringent regs, the cost to manufacture here will be higher by the cost of compliance (which is not insignificant). This will make the USA that much more uncompetitive in the world market.
We should be in a position to apply tariffs to imported goods that are equal to the advantage realized by a trading partners non-compliance with environmental regulations. The World Bank has environmental standards that might be used for that purpose.
proverbialwisdom
(4,959 posts)This shit's a nightmare.
goddammit
Autumn
(45,120 posts)"This draft chapter falls flat on every single one of our issues oceans, fish, wildlife, and forest protections and in fact, rolls back on the progress made in past free trade pacts.
This can not pass. Recommended.
Kurovski
(34,655 posts)"Americans cant retaliate because they cant think for themselves.They have been manipulated to adopt the values of their Wall St. masters via corporate media and two-party tribalism...
You cant hate victims of this conformity, who are generally well-meaning simpletons.Their corporate brainwashing prevents them from realizing this is the end-game stage of class warfare, and TPP,, net neutrality, and banking capture of commodities markets are all anti-Ameican, anti-people and anti-free enterprise initiatives of corporate state monopoly extraction..."