General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOH BOY!!! Hillary is still war mongering
http://swampland.time.com/2014/01/16/hillary-clinton-discussed-u-s-approval-of-an-israeli-strike-on-iran/hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)sabbat hunter
(6,838 posts)Clinton did not actually endorse the idea. She only raised the notion as one option to consider, according to one former official, who adds that it gained no traction inside the administration
Read more: Hillary Clinton Discussed U.S. Approval of an Israeli Strike On Iran | TIME.com http://swampland.time.com/2014/01/16/hillary-clinton-discussed-u-s-approval-of-an-israeli-strike-on-iran/#ixzz2qaDW18Of
Plus the quote is from when she was SoS not recent comments she made.
Beacool
(30,253 posts)Should have read the article a bit closer.
DURHAM D
(32,611 posts)Besides, that's part of the job. Advisers, cabinet members, etc., present all options to the president and he makes the final decision. Submitting a proposal doesn't mean advocating every option contained in it.
DURHAM D
(32,611 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)She proposed viewing it as an alternative--technically it was--and it got shot down and was never taken seriously.
MicaelS
(8,747 posts)She was only doing her job, giving POTUS all options.
Beacool
(30,253 posts)Clinton did not actually endorse the idea. She only raised the notion as one option to consider, according to one former official, who adds that it gained no traction inside the administration. Clintons current press secretary, Nick Merrill, did not respond to requests for comment this week on this matter.
While the very idea of a U.S.-approved Israeli strike on Iran is dramatic, Clintons thought experiment was actually a responsible act of bureaucratic deliberation, says Kenneth Pollack, a former White House national security aide under Bill Clinton and author of a recent book on Iran.
Anytime something like that comes up, you need to discuss itand in fact its irresponsible not to, says Pollack, who adds that he personally thinks a unilateral Israeli strike should be resisted. Sometimes you just want to look at it, and if you decide its a bad idea, that allows you to make the case against it more effectively. So it leads to a much better policy process in which you can figure out what to do instead.
It's called brain storming. We do it all the time at work. We put all our ideas and options on the table and the big boss picks the ones that are most viable.
DURHAM D
(32,611 posts)Beacool
(30,253 posts)It's bad enough reading this crap on other sites, but the constant attempt to troll for anything negative on Hillary at DU is beyond depressing. It's also infuriating. They treat her as if she were Cruz or Palin: the enemy.