General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTexas Public (charter) Schools Are Teaching Creationism
They talk about choice and liberty but infiltrating, subverting, taking over public education to conform to their twisted worldview is their goal. Making us dumber one student at a time.
The more than 17,000 students in the Responsive Education Solutions charter system will learn in their history classes that some residents of the Philippines were pagans in various levels of civilization. Theyll read in a history textbook that feminism forced women to turn to the government as a surrogate husband.
Responsive Ed has a secular veneer and is funded by public money, but it has been connected from its inception to the creationist movement and to far-right fundamentalists who seek to undermine the separation of church and state.
Infiltrating and subverting the charter-school movement has allowed Responsive Ed to carry out its religious agendaand it is succeeding. Operating more than 65 campuses in Texas, Arkansas, and Indiana, Responsive Ed receives more than $82 million in taxpayer money annually, and it is expanding, with 20 more Texas campuses opening in 2014.
http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/science/2014/01/creationism_in_texas_public_schools_undermining_the_charter_movement.html
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)That's $82 million dollars they should NOT be given, considering they're in violation of the U.S. Constitution. They want to indoctrinate people with creationism? Do it on their own dime!
Let's see how they fare after they're stripped of $82 million dollars.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)Thanks for sharing, Tierra_y_Libertad.
ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)RainDog
(28,784 posts)Coyotl
(15,262 posts)napkinz
(17,199 posts)SoCalDem
(103,856 posts)Calling charter schools "public" does not MAKE them public (except for the part where they take public money)..
These are experimental schools where they can hire non-union teachers and can cherry-pick students, and can use whatever book they choose to use..
Viking12
(6,012 posts)The dangerous charters are those run outside the framework of public accountability by ideological nuts and shady for-profit outfits. Like the Texas examples I cite in the OP, these are a real threat to public education.
On the other hand, there are different types of charter schools so some differentiation is necessary. Here in WI, we have charter schools that are part of the normal public school structure. These charters are share facilities with 'regular' schools, are staffed with fully qualified teachers, and are accountable directly to the superintendent and the school board. The only difference from a 'regular' public school is that they offer specialized instructional approaches such as Montessori-style curriculum, accelerated learning programs for gifted students, or an emphasis on arts music or science, etc...These charters provide a real choice and offer opportunities to meet the needs of kids and the desires of parents without compromising public ed on the whole. My kids are enrolled in these charters and I strongly support them.