Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsROMNEY already promising to ignore constitution!
ROMNEY:
"In looking at Justice Sotomayor, my view was her philosophy is quite different than my own and that's the reason why I would not support her as a justice for the Supreme Court," Romney told reporters Friday afternoon, just minutes after his plane touched down in San Juan. "I would be happy to have a justice of Puerto Rican descent or a Puerto Rican individual on the Supreme Court, but they would have to share my philosophy, that comes first."
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=148771888
Political decisions are made by those who have been elected to do so. As judges have not been elected by the people , they do not make political decisions.
To maintain the distinction between judicial and political decisions, the Founding Fathers anticipated that the judiciary would work free of political interference. Alexander Hamilton wrote:
To maintain full judicial independence, the Constitution clearly states, in Article III, that judicial power lies with the Supreme Court and the inferior federal courts established by Congress. The Article also clearly states that judges cannot be dismissed or receive unfavourable treatment simply because they make a judgement that does not find political support and/or favour from the party in power.
http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/supreme_court.htm
To maintain the distinction between judicial and political decisions, the Founding Fathers anticipated that the judiciary would work free of political interference. Alexander Hamilton wrote:
"the complete independence of the courts of justice is peculiarly essential in a limited constitution."
To maintain full judicial independence, the Constitution clearly states, in Article III, that judicial power lies with the Supreme Court and the inferior federal courts established by Congress. The Article also clearly states that judges cannot be dismissed or receive unfavourable treatment simply because they make a judgement that does not find political support and/or favour from the party in power.
http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/supreme_court.htm
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1095 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
ROMNEY already promising to ignore constitution! (Original Post)
kpete
Mar 2012
OP
hughee99
(16,113 posts)1. So Romney wouldn't nominate someone like Sotomayor, why is this ignoring the constitution?
Clinton and Obama didn't nominate those with "conservative" philosophies. Unless he's talking about removing her from her seat, I don't see the issue here.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)2. He's saying that he would nominate people
That would follow ideology over law. That's the problem.
hughee99
(16,113 posts)3. I went back and reread the article.
I think you're reading into it what you believe (and it may be true) but I don't think he said that at all.