General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHow Voter ID Laws Are Being Used to Disenfranchise Minorities and the Poor
This is a story that needs to be spread. We need people to understand where the real fraud in the election process is.
From The Atlantic
First, let's call it what it is. The burgeoning battles over state redistricting and voter ID laws -- and the larger fight over a key part of the Voting Rights Act itself -- are all cynical expressions of the concerns many conservatives (of both parties) have about the future of the American electorate. The Republican lawmakers who are leading the fight for the restrictive legislation say they are doing so in the name of stopping election fraud -- and, really, who's in favor of election fraud? But the larger purpose and effect of the laws is to disenfranchise Hispanic voters, other minorities, and the poor -- most of whom, let's also be clear, vote for Democrats.
Jonathan Chait, in a smart recent New York magazine piece titled "2012 or Never," offered some numbers supporting the theory. "Every year," Chait wrote, "the nonwhite proportion of the electorate grows by about half a percentage point -- meaning that in every presidential election, the minority share of the vote increases by 2 percent, a huge amount in a closely divided country." This explains, for example, why Colorado, Nevada, and Arizona are turning purple instead of staying red. "By 2020," Chait writes, "nonwhite voters should rise from a quarter of the 2008 electorate to one third. In 30 years, "nonwhites will outnumber whites."
Which is why "whites," and especially white men, seem so determined this election cycle to make it harder for nonwhites to exercise their right to vote. The news from the front this week is telling. On Wednesday, in Pennsylvania, GOP Governor Tom Corbett raced to sign a bill that requires photo identification of voters. The day before, in Texas, GOP Attorney General Greg Abbott amended the Lone Star State's complaint against the federal government to seek to strike down the pre-clearance section of the Voting Rights Act, which had in turn been used by the Justice Department to block Texas' recent efforts at a stringent new voter-ID law.
More at: http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2012/03/how-voter-id-laws-are-being-used-to-disenfranchise-minorities-and-the-poor/254572/
UTUSN
(70,695 posts)seattleblah
(69 posts)are talking around indirectly banning a few minority voters instead of doing what they really want which is to outlaw minority voters. It seems like their agenda would be more effective if they went the direct route rather than talking in circles and doublespeak about what they really want.
emilyg
(22,742 posts)photo id too?
WillowTree
(5,325 posts)Help those who need it to get the necessary IDs. Get the word out in those communities that would be hardest hit and give assistance to those who need it. That's what I'll be doing. I don't want to take any chances that anyone who is eligible will be denied his or her vote and I'm more into action than whining.
Preybrother
(4 posts)Julian, you don't mention that fact that the Supreme Court has already upheld Voter ID. Eric Holder is only challenging new Voter ID laws in only states covered under the voting rights act. How do people cash a check this days without someone sort of ID unless they used direct deposit and only a debit card and even thing a store might ask for an ID to use the card. Your not making any sense. There are more older White People in this country and this will apply to them too. My God, we have people going to all the shut-ins and old folks homes during election time to fill out absentee voting cards so how are people being shut out? Your really be divisive when you start this "White man" thing. As an old FDR Democrat, don't you know how many old White guys there are out there voting the straight Democrat ticket? Let me tell you, today's Democrat Party is not the same as it was in earlier times under FDR and LBJ. What happened? It seems like radicals have taken over the party and there's no room for those that are close to the center.
seattleblah
(69 posts)that the people who want to fix things are pushing out the jerks that don't want anything changed. We have a word for those FDR Democrats. The correct insult is conservative. Screw them if they want to hold back progress.