Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Baclava

(12,047 posts)
Tue Jan 21, 2014, 01:54 PM Jan 2014

Sharks In Danger After Australian Official Sweeps Away Protections

Australia’s environment minister has swept away existing federal protections for endangered species, so the controversial shark cull may go on in the western part of the country.

Greg Hunt, who has come under fire lately from conservationists and scientists who oppose the cull, said that it was in Australia’s “national interest” to exempt the state of Western Australia from the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act. Hunt’s approval of the exemption was made public on Monday evening.

The cull, which involves stringing baited hooks off the shores of popular beaches in Perth to lure sharks in and then shooting them if they’re over nine feet long, is intended to decrease the number of shark attacks on humans. There have been seven fatal attacks in the past three years.

Opponents have called the approach inhumane and unscientific, claiming that it will only increase shark attacks on humans by drawing them closer to shore.

https://www.thedodo.com/sharks-in-danger-after-austral-397507145.html


----------------------

Blood in the water

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sharks In Danger After Australian Official Sweeps Away Protections (Original Post) Baclava Jan 2014 OP
Obviously he's preparing for Sharknado. NV Whino Jan 2014 #1
Sounds like 1916 all over again Baclava Jan 2014 #6
people kill 10 million sharks for every person killed by a shark nt geek tragedy Jan 2014 #2
Public safety my ass. This is the real reason. redqueen Jan 2014 #3
Bingo! MoonRiver Jan 2014 #4
If it helps save one human life seveneyes Jan 2014 #5
It's a divided issue Baclava Jan 2014 #7
 

Baclava

(12,047 posts)
6. Sounds like 1916 all over again
Tue Jan 21, 2014, 06:55 PM
Jan 2014


"The shark attacks had struck terror into people along the coast. The number of bathers coming to the beach dropped in some places by 75%. Merchants that depended on tourism lost a quarter of a million dollars worth of business. Armed men in motorboats began to patrol the waters off the Jersey beaches. Communities began to offer a bounty for each shark caught and killed. There was even talk of having the military eradicate all sharks off the Jersey coast, though this was clearly impractical. "


redqueen

(115,103 posts)
3. Public safety my ass. This is the real reason.
Tue Jan 21, 2014, 03:20 PM
Jan 2014

From the Guardian article linked in the blog post:

The exemption states that WA’s $8.5bn tourism industry could be hit by continual shark attacks
 

Baclava

(12,047 posts)
7. It's a divided issue
Thu Jan 23, 2014, 01:06 PM
Jan 2014
Australian state divided after shark cull gets the green light

A plan to kill sharks off the coast of Western Australia is set to begin this week. Authorities say their strategy will reduce the risk of attack to members of the public, but critics warn it could harm the ecosystem


Five years ago, Paul de Gelder lost his hand and a leg in a shark attack. The navy clearance diver was swimming on his back through Sydney Harbor in 2009, when a bull shark bit into his thigh and thrashed him around "like a rag doll".

"I was absolutely petrified of sharks before I got attacked," he said. "That's the ingrained fear of being eaten alive." But despite his encounter, de Gelder is speaking out against a plan to catch and kill large sharks in the Australian state of Western Australia.

Under the plan, which received final approval this week, professional fishermen will be contracted to shoot sharks over three meters in length that stray into nets. Up to 72 so-called drum lines, consisting of floating drums, nets and hooks laced with bait, will be installed one kilometer from the shoreline of at-risk beaches. The nets will be kept in place in Perth and on the south west coast until April 30.

The state government said the plan is an attempt to reassure the public and the tourism industry, following seven fatal shark attacks in the region over the past three years. In the most recent incident in November, surfer Chris Boyd was killed in an attack south of Perth.

"These measures could definitely stop similar attacks from happening," de Gelder told DW. "But, the great white shark is on a protected list. And now the State Premier has decided that he's just going to openly slaughter as many as he can. It doesn't make any sense."

http://www.dw.de/australian-state-divided-after-shark-cull-gets-the-green-light/a-17370817
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Sharks In Danger After Au...