Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
Tue Jan 21, 2014, 07:09 PM Jan 2014

This is a BIG deal case: Justices Appear Divided on Challenge to Public Unions

WASHINGTON — A broad challenge to public sector unions was met with a mixed response on Tuesday at the Supreme Court.

The case, brought by Illinois workers who provide home health care to Medicaid recipients, could have been argued on narrow grounds. But the workers’ lawyer decided to go big.

The lawyer, William L. Messenger of the National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, asked the Supreme Court to overrule a foundational 1977 decision and to declare that government workers may not be forced to pay dues to unions to represent them in collective bargaining negotiations if they disagree with the positions the unions take.

<snip>

On Tuesday, Justice Stephen G. Breyer said there was no good reason to overturn the balance struck in 1977. He said he feared that “the courts of the United States are going to fashion, using the First Amendment as their weapon, a new special labor law for government employees.”

Much more about this case and oral arguments that took place today:

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/22/us/justices-appear-divided-on-challenge-to-public-unions.html

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
This is a BIG deal case: Justices Appear Divided on Challenge to Public Unions (Original Post) cali Jan 2014 OP
This is terrifying. This is really the future of US labor, right here. Squinch Jan 2014 #1
Scalia was sympathetic to the union Johonny Jan 2014 #2
or pretending to be. beats the hell out of me. cali Jan 2014 #3
No money, no representation adigal Jan 2014 #4
Maybe they'll follow Reagan Oilwellian Jan 2014 #5
Appear. Good description. nt Snotcicles Jan 2014 #6
 

adigal

(7,581 posts)
4. No money, no representation
Tue Jan 21, 2014, 08:32 PM
Jan 2014

The biggest union haters in my building are the ones who usually need the union because they do stupid stuff.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This is a BIG deal case: ...