Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
Fri Jan 24, 2014, 01:51 PM Jan 2014

First Things First: Why the United States Need a Pro-Democracy Movement & Fixes for Citizens United

First Things First: Why the United States Need a Pro-Democracy Movement
Until we fix our democracy problem, it's hard to fix any problem.
by Marge Baker

In the four years since the Supreme Court’s infamous Citizens United v. FEC ruling, two things have become abundantly clear.Though the problem of money in politics can feel overwhelming, there are a number of workable solutions being considered federally and implemented in the states.

First, we have a major democracy problem. Citizens United paved the way for unlimited corporate spending to distort our elections. Staggering amounts of money have poured into our political system since the Court handed down that decision.


This has proven true across the board. Whether the issue you’re most concerned about is making your community safer, guaranteeing that your family has access to clean water, or ensuring that workers get a fair minimum wage, when wealthy special interests can buy their way into the hearts, minds, and votes of elected officials, progress on these issues will continue to stall.

Clearly, when moneyed interests can spend virtually without limitation to influence our elections, they can set the political agenda.

The Citizens United ruling gutted the ability of Congress and the states to put common-sense limits on this runaway spending, and the effects haven’t been subtle. In the wake of these campaign finance changes, outside political spending by Super PACs and other channels has reached an all-time high of $1 billion, the Associated Press found.

And now, a case currently being considered by the Supreme Court, McCutcheon v. FEC, could could allow even more money to flood our political system.


This isn’t the kind of “democracy” Americans of any political background want. A recent poll shows that more than nine in ten Americans think it’s important for elected officials to reduce the influence of money in our elections.

Though the problem of money in politics can feel overwhelming, there are a number of workable solutions being considered federally and implemented in the states.

MATCHING DONATIONS:

Small-donor legislation is one good option. This type of law provides matching funds for small donations at a multiple ratio (such as 5:1 or 10:1). It also amplifies the effect of small donations, providing a way for them to carry real weight in political campaigns. That encourages political participation by people who may have felt before that their contributions didn’t matter.

For candidates, small-donor public financing provides an alternative for those who don’t want to be reliant on, and beholden to, wealthy special interests to fund their campaigns.


MANDATORY DISCLOSURE OF POLITICAL SPENDING

Another is the mandatory disclosure of political spending. Although Congress isn’t likely to pass disclosure legislation anytime soon, many states are responding to the post-Citizens United spending bonanza by closing loopholes so that big, special interest donors can’t hide behind “dark money” groups in elections.

Additionally, the year after Citizens United, a group of law professors asked the Securities and Exchange Commission to require publicly traded corporations to disclose their political spending to their shareholders and the public.
Despite the proposal’s immense popularity, the SEC recently took the corporate political disclosure rule (SEC File No 4-637) off its agenda. That agenda, however, isn’t binding, and the SEC could — and should — still adopt the rule right away.

PASS STATE AMENDMENTS TO AMEND CONSTITUTION TO OVERTURN CITIZENS UNITED:

But most importantly, to fix our democracy problem, we have to be able to enact common-sense regulations on political spending. To fix the root problem — in the absence of a change in who’s on the Supreme Court – we must amend the Constitution to undo the damage of Citizens United and other cases that have handed huge power to Wall Street and giant corporations.

City by city and state by state, the people are taking that power back. Sixteen states and more than 500 cities and towns have called on Congress to pass an amendment overturning Citizens United and related cases.

All of these solutions are steps toward a larger goal: putting our democracy back in the hands of “we the people,” and fighting for a more transparent, vibrant democratic system responsive to the needs of everyday Americans.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.

Marge Baker is executive vice president of People For the American Way.

http://www.commondreams.org/view/2014/01/22-9

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
First Things First: Why the United States Need a Pro-Democracy Movement & Fixes for Citizens United (Original Post) KoKo Jan 2014 OP
Thanks to SCROTUS, money trumps democracy. Octafish Jan 2014 #1
That SEC took it off their agenda is a big "tell." KoKo Jan 2014 #2
Well said, KoKo. Octafish Jan 2014 #3
Thanks for that...and "the Meyer Lansky of the War Party." KoKo Jan 2014 #5
K&R woo me with science Jan 2014 #4

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
1. Thanks to SCROTUS, money trumps democracy.
Fri Jan 24, 2014, 01:55 PM
Jan 2014

From Marge Baker in OP:

Additionally, the year after Citizens United, a group of law professors asked the Securities and Exchange Commission to require publicly traded corporations to disclose their political spending to their shareholders and the public. Despite the proposal’s immense popularity, the SEC recently took the corporate political disclosure rule (SEC File No 4-637) off its agenda. That agenda, however, isn’t binding, and the SEC could — and should — still adopt the rule right away.

Thanks for the OP, KoKo. With the Truth, We the People can save democracy.

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
2. That SEC took it off their agenda is a big "tell."
Fri Jan 24, 2014, 03:01 PM
Jan 2014

Between the bogus "Trade Agreements" and the demise of the country...the blame goes to Wall Street/MIC/Media/Entertainment Complex and made them the Top 1% while the Politicians Cashed in on the backs of the rest of us.

They are "in your face" about it now that they are out of the shadows.

But....it's encouraging to see new efforts springing up now that the light is shone on the cockroaches. Here on DU there's not much effort (not like the old days) but maybe that's a good sign that the efforts have become more mainstream than when we were the activist place so long ago after the Bushies stole that election. Now we know that things were stolen from us long before that fateful day.

It's encouraging that so many organizations and coalitions plus new alternative media are actively engaging in working together to Democracy/Republic from the Beasts of Wall Street and PTB. I just wish we here could discuss these efforts like the old days with enthusiasm. But, this is a Political Site..so, I guess there's not much interest here about what goes on out there with the average people in the rest of hills, hollows, plains and coasts the US, anymore. Especially when the politicians we elected don't seem to care enough to do much of anything to stop our economic and social decline. Still...the mighty efforts going on "under the radar" of the DC/New York corridor are growing and that will be the real HOPE for CHANGE...imho.

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
5. Thanks for that...and "the Meyer Lansky of the War Party."
Fri Jan 24, 2014, 04:29 PM
Jan 2014

ain't that the truth...just thinking about it.

Need a big place in Hell for some of these people. There seem to be so many in both political spheres they could have a real nice barbeque get-together down there.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»First Things First: Why t...