Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

marmar

(77,081 posts)
Fri Jan 24, 2014, 01:59 PM Jan 2014

Chicago Residents Rebel Against Koch Brothers and Rahm Emanuel Over Petroleum Coke Hazard


Chicago Residents Rebel Against Koch Brothers and Rahm Emanuel Over Petroleum Coke Hazard
MARK KARLIN, EDITOR OF BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT


The Koch brothers are benefitting from the Alberta tar sands operation big time as they amass mountains of a byproduct -- petroleum coke -- to sell overseas.

As with many toxic industries, the Koch brothers are locating storage large storage piles of “petcoke” in poor down-on-their-heels neighborhoods. This first came to notice in Detroit, where the Kochs were storing the hazardous material -- in open air -- along the Detroit River until ships could transport it overseas (particularly to China).

As EcoNews reported last year:

The New York Times is reporting about a growing, dirty side effect of refining tar sands bitumen from Canada. The evidence is on clear display as a black mountain piles up alongside the Detroit River, thanks in part to Charles and David Koch.

“Assumption Park gives residents of this city lovely views of the Ambassador Bridge and the Detroit skyline. Lately they’ve been treated to another sight: a three-story pile of petroleum coke covering an entire city block on the other side of the Detroit River. Detroit’s ever-growing black mountain is the unloved, unwanted and long overlooked byproduct of Canada’s oil sands boom,” says the article, “A Black Mound of Canadian Oil Waste Is Rising Over Detroit.”

The toxic mountain of petroleum coke, or petcoke, is like coal but dirtier, and is being sold by Koch Carbon to fuel the coal plants of countries like China. “The coke (in Detroit) comes from a refinery alongside the river owned by Marathon Petroleum, which has been there since 1930. But it began refining exports from the Canadian oil sands—and producing the waste that is sold to Koch—only in November."

A study from Oil Change International earlier this year details just how dangerous petcoke is to the environment.


A similar storage hazard exists on Chicago's struggling Southwest Side, along the Calumet River. Many residents are revolting against Mayor Rahm Emanuel's proposed industry friendly regulations and support a ban on open storage of petroleum coke (a move opposed by Emanuel). .........................(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.truth-out.org/buzzflash/commentary/item/18435-chicago-residents-rebel-against-koch-brothers-and-rahm-emanuel-over-petroleum-coke-hazard



4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Chicago Residents Rebel Against Koch Brothers and Rahm Emanuel Over Petroleum Coke Hazard (Original Post) marmar Jan 2014 OP
I'm not real familiar with this problem, but something isn't right about Emanuel reference OKNancy Jan 2014 #1
Here's a more recent article ....... marmar Jan 2014 #2
Not sure how toxic the petcoke is to people standing near it. Igel Jan 2014 #4
video of what this madness looks like blowing in the wind... bettydavis Jan 2014 #3

OKNancy

(41,832 posts)
1. I'm not real familiar with this problem, but something isn't right about Emanuel reference
Fri Jan 24, 2014, 02:07 PM
Jan 2014
http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2013-11-20/news/ct-rahm-petcoke-met-20131120_1_refinery-waste-beemsterboer-slag-co-uncovered-piles
Emanuel signals crackdown on piles of refinery waste
Mayor says city may require Southeast Side refinery waste be enclosed

---------------------
http://www.npr.org/2013/12/20/255699254/chicago-moves-to-limit-petroleum-coke-storage

---------------------

I'm not sure this author is correct about Emanuel.

marmar

(77,081 posts)
2. Here's a more recent article .......
Fri Jan 24, 2014, 02:14 PM
Jan 2014

http://www.midwestenergynews.com/2014/01/14/in-chicago-neighbors-say-petcoke-rules-full-of-loopholes/


Alderman John Pope, who represents the Chicago neighborhoods most affected, and Ed Burke, a powerful alderman with an interest in clean air, have proposed two ordinances related to petcoke. One favored by Burke would ban petcoke storage in Chicago. The other, pushed by Pope, would impose site-specific regulations.

Emanuel last month rejected the idea of a citywide ban on petcoke storage, saying a state or federal solution is needed. On Monday, Illinois Governor Pat Quinn proposed emergency rules on petcoke storage statewide.

The proposed city rules would cover storage of solid bulk materials including petcoke, coal, ore and other materials used as fuel. Piles of salt, construction and demolition debris, waste and recycling material would not be subject to the regulations.

Igel

(35,320 posts)
4. Not sure how toxic the petcoke is to people standing near it.
Fri Jan 24, 2014, 03:11 PM
Jan 2014

Produces more carbon dioxide than other kinds of carbon, but also burns hot without much ash (which is a good thing if you're producing steel or don't want too much ash). It makes for some really unhealthy gases during production (which should be captured by the refinery). I mean, coke is bitumen or anthracite that's had everything volatile removed. I grew up around mounds of coal coke. Light, silvery, hard, porous.

So if it's a volatile chemical, it's been removed from the coke. Might still contain metals, including heavy metals, and sulfur. My only real concern would be what slightly acidic rainwater might dissolve out and leach into the ground. Some petcokes have far higher metal concentrations than others.

Otherwise I haven't heard of the unhealthy effects of petcoke from just sitting there. Most people take "high CO2 = toxic, toxic means dangerous if it's near me." I mean, that pile of leaves and grass I'm composting is going to produce a lot of CO2, but I rather think it'll be good for my garden and isn't overly toxic.

Have heard that it's unsightly--both the petcoke and my pile of organic debris--but I don't regard "unsightly" as equivalent to "toxic."

(Otherwise I guess the new US Olympic winter parade uniforms would have to be dubbed "toxic". You know, I might be okay with that.)

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Chicago Residents Rebel A...