Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
Fri Jan 24, 2014, 05:46 PM Jan 2014

Republicans planning three separate responses to State of the Union speech

Republicans planning three separate responses to State of the Union speech

by Hunter

I see we're continuing the new tradition of giving Republicans not just one "response" to the State of the Union Address, but as many as they like. So far, we've got three separate "responses" in the works.

1. The official response from Republicans will come from Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers, who will be playing the usual role of up-and-coming Republican looking to not humiliate themselves on national television. It's a tightrope act, and sometimes (we're looking at you, Bobby Jindal) does not live up to the party's expectations.

2. Ah, but ever since Bush-era conservatism collapsed under the weight of, well, the Bush administration, we've been pretending that something called the tea party movement is an entirely separate party that just happens to be made up entirely of Republicans and is spoken for in Congress entirely by Republicans, and so they have decided they need their own "response" to the State of the Union and to the traditional Republican "response." The winner this year is Sen. Mike Lee, primarily known for his role as Sen. Ted Cruz's footstool. His role and agenda will be exactly the same as those of the official Republican response, but Sen. Mike Lee will say it more dully and with less finesse. You know: tea party.

3. The third "response" will be given by Sen. Rand Paul, and will be representing the faction of the Republican Party known as Rand Paul, delivered for the benefit of Rand Paul. Given that Rand Paul really and truly is his own faction of the party (he certainly, say, doesn't give a particular damn about anyone not named Rand or Paul) it's hard to argue with this, and since we all know Rand Paul would be giving a "response" to the State of the Union in front of his bathroom mirror that night anyway, might as well slap a camera in front of it.

So that's three, with more possibly to come. Gotta make sure the conservative point of view is adequately represented, after all, what with the Democratic dominance on all of the Sunday shows.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/01/24/1272235/-Republicans-planning-three-separate-responses-to-State-of-the-Union-speech

LOL!

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Republicans planning three separate responses to State of the Union speech (Original Post) ProSense Jan 2014 OP
why why why leftyohiolib Jan 2014 #1
Darn. I was really thirsting to hear from Marco Rubio again. tanyev Jan 2014 #2
Makes no difference how many responses they prepare. Brigid Jan 2014 #3
Rhetoric vs rhetoric. djean111 Jan 2014 #4
. Grassy Knoll Jan 2014 #5
Obama should be allowed two more speeches then. lpbk2713 Jan 2014 #6
+1 Jamaal510 Jan 2014 #11
Of course they are! 1. Ben 2. Gha 3. Zi 11 Bravo Jan 2014 #7
All the more remarkable because there is no progressive response to the SOU. denverbill Jan 2014 #8
They're gonna need a bigger water bottle JHB Jan 2014 #9
Wouldn't it be great to put Rodgers, Lee, and Paul all in front of the same mic and FSogol Jan 2014 #10
Here's the way that the speeches will sound Jamaal510 Jan 2014 #12

Brigid

(17,621 posts)
3. Makes no difference how many responses they prepare.
Fri Jan 24, 2014, 05:54 PM
Jan 2014

Nobody has to listen to them. I know I won't be.

lpbk2713

(42,759 posts)
6. Obama should be allowed two more speeches then.
Fri Jan 24, 2014, 05:58 PM
Jan 2014


Or maybe Biden could give one and Reid or Wendy Davis another.



denverbill

(11,489 posts)
8. All the more remarkable because there is no progressive response to the SOU.
Fri Jan 24, 2014, 06:03 PM
Jan 2014

Obama=DLC moderate
McMorris=Conservative
Tea Party=Reactionary
Paul=Libertarian crackpot.

FSogol

(45,488 posts)
10. Wouldn't it be great to put Rodgers, Lee, and Paul all in front of the same mic and
Fri Jan 24, 2014, 06:06 PM
Jan 2014

have them all give their "speeches" simultaneously while trying to talk over each other?

I would give so much to see that.

Jamaal510

(10,893 posts)
12. Here's the way that the speeches will sound
Fri Jan 24, 2014, 06:20 PM
Jan 2014

for those who don't want to listen:

Speaker #1: "Obama is evil."
Speaker #2: "Obama sucks."
Speaker #3: "Obama is a lame."

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Republicans planning thre...