Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
63 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Something is very wrong... (Original Post) Playinghardball Jan 2014 OP
god damn right. K&R Whisp Jan 2014 #1
Oh, for Christ's Sake! adirondacker Feb 2014 #46
Nobody is enforcing this. We should have inspectors in every church Cleita Jan 2014 #2
Absolutely right! silverweb Jan 2014 #6
Just like with any other non-profit, there is no prohibition against lobbying for specific political cbayer Jan 2014 #8
I don't want to remove the tax status. I do want oversight to make Cleita Jan 2014 #20
And we completely agree on that. cbayer Jan 2014 #24
Seems to me that this violates the Constitution separation of Church and State. nm rhett o rick Feb 2014 #54
And how much would all that auditing and monitoring cost? seveneyes Jan 2014 #22
What it used to cost to have inspectors, once a good civil service job, Cleita Jan 2014 #28
seems they could help…. dhill926 Jan 2014 #3
Anastasia screamed in vain Fumesucker Jan 2014 #4
Pleased to meet you. 11 Bravo Jan 2014 #5
When I was back there in seminary school Fumesucker Jan 2014 #10
You cannot petition the Lord with prayer. redwitch Feb 2014 #48
... Fumesucker Feb 2014 #50
But I hear the pope is a nice guy. AtheistCrusader Jan 2014 #7
Do you have any information on the breakdown of organizations here? cbayer Jan 2014 #9
Ah, I found it. Once people see the data, I'm not sure they will hold the same position. cbayer Jan 2014 #11
Thanks, I finally now know what AIPAC stands for! Rex Jan 2014 #12
And that is where the bulk of the money is coming from. cbayer Jan 2014 #13
I've seen it all over the place in threads. Rex Jan 2014 #14
It is a PAC. All these groups are PAC's. cbayer Jan 2014 #16
Public Affairs Committee Rex Jan 2014 #17
The 'bulk' if 'the bulk' means about half the money Over 85 Million from 'Family Research Bluenorthwest Feb 2014 #45
Thread yellowwoodII Jan 2014 #21
Why bother. It would sink like a stone. cbayer Jan 2014 #26
Interesting info. TBF Jan 2014 #33
This set me mind to wondering......???? Must do a little research. northoftheborder Feb 2014 #53
Actually, it reinforces my position. progressoid Jan 2014 #39
Here's the complete list sorted by expenditures mathematic Feb 2014 #58
I would think the subsidy is in the hundreds of billions on free real estate alone. Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2014 #15
$71 Billion tax exemption!! ErikJ Jan 2014 #18
Disgusting. Arugula Latte Jan 2014 #19
K&R! Phlem Jan 2014 #23
That's why I only give to causes, not churches. Ilsa Jan 2014 #25
I don't have much to spare being I'm on social security but when Cleita Jan 2014 #29
I agree. The causes I give to directly benefit Ilsa Jan 2014 #31
This merits a re-run 90-percent Jan 2014 #27
That was fantastic, Jimmy! Enthusiast Feb 2014 #42
K&R But dramatically understates the enforced subsidies these parasites take from us. n/t Egalitarian Thug Jan 2014 #30
KICK! Gravely Wrong. Cha Jan 2014 #32
boom! BlancheSplanchnik Jan 2014 #34
K&R johnnyreb Jan 2014 #35
So, for every dollar they spend on lobbying . . . another_liberal Jan 2014 #36
Religion is the biggest scam/racket in the history of humanity. Arugula Latte Feb 2014 #55
You're preaching to the choir here. another_liberal Feb 2014 #63
Just like Obama's continuing George W. Bush's "Faith Based Initiatives," it fuses State and Church. blkmusclmachine Jan 2014 #37
But he give it a new name! progressoid Jan 2014 #38
That was deeply disturbing to me, Enthusiast Feb 2014 #43
Oh yeah, it would have been wonderful to try to defend that change considering the sources stevenleser Feb 2014 #57
They have no morals. DeSwiss Feb 2014 #40
I'd like to see the receipts and see who they've bought!!! Theyletmeeatcake2 Feb 2014 #41
Here's one of those corrupt groups you are talking about: Ms. Toad Feb 2014 #44
That's good that you do that and pats on the back... Theyletmeeatcake2 Feb 2014 #47
Why religions, and not other 501(c)(4) groups? Ms. Toad Feb 2014 #61
Some of those groups you talk about do good things ! I don't know if registers are kept Theyletmeeatcake2 Feb 2014 #62
You people are misinterpreting this packman Feb 2014 #49
Absolutely, something is wrong... MrMickeysMom Feb 2014 #51
I think it works like this... workinclasszero Feb 2014 #52
K & R defacto7 Feb 2014 #56
k&r for the truth. n/t Laelth Feb 2014 #59
K & R Quantess Feb 2014 #60

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
2. Nobody is enforcing this. We should have inspectors in every church
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 03:56 PM
Jan 2014

and religion monitoring the sermons and auditing the books to make sure they are following the law just like the inspectors do at your favorite restaurant. It doesn't have to be every day just like in restaurant just every now and then unless there are complaints just to make sure they are compliant. I would have the IRS audit their books every other year to verify their non-profit and tax free status as well.

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
8. Just like with any other non-profit, there is no prohibition against lobbying for specific political
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 05:06 PM
Jan 2014

causes.

The prohibitions are for endorsing specific candidates.

I doubt that you want to remove the tax status from your favorite organizations that advocate and lobby for causes your support.

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
20. I don't want to remove the tax status. I do want oversight to make
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 05:55 PM
Jan 2014

sure that this privilege isn't abused and many right wing organizations have seen church as a place to promote their agenda because of the lack of oversight.

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
24. And we completely agree on that.
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 06:10 PM
Jan 2014

I think the IRS has been extremely lax and needs to get on this.

I just don't want to throw the baby out with the bathwater.

 

seveneyes

(4,631 posts)
22. And how much would all that auditing and monitoring cost?
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 06:09 PM
Jan 2014

I'm thinking it would be very expensive.

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
28. What it used to cost to have inspectors, once a good civil service job,
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 06:56 PM
Jan 2014

with benefits and job security. We do need to create jobs and this is one way. Before the gangster caucus of the GOP cheated their way to cushy jobs in our government, undermining our government civil service organizations that served to administer services and enforce our laws we had a pretty good America in the cogs and wheels functions of our governments.

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
9. Do you have any information on the breakdown of organizations here?
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 05:07 PM
Jan 2014

Are they all right wing or are some of them liberal/progressive?

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
14. I've seen it all over the place in threads.
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 05:19 PM
Jan 2014

So it is a religious organization? Interesting. Always thought it was just another PAC.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
17. Public Affairs Committee
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 05:29 PM
Jan 2014

Political Action Committee...yeah you are 100 correct how ironically curious.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
45. The 'bulk' if 'the bulk' means about half the money Over 85 Million from 'Family Research
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 09:21 AM
Feb 2014

Council' and the rest. Tony Perkins, hate monger, is at #2. The 'Concerned Women' is an anti choice and anti feminist group.

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
26. Why bother. It would sink like a stone.
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 06:12 PM
Jan 2014

People are much more interested in an inflammatory headline and a totally misleading graphic.

TBF

(32,071 posts)
33. Interesting info.
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 10:34 PM
Jan 2014

The churches here in Texas are huge and do an incredible amount of charitable work in the communities as well (as do their members). They should face the same standards as other non-profits - no more or less.

mathematic

(1,439 posts)
58. Here's the complete list sorted by expenditures
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 04:10 PM
Feb 2014
http://projects.pewforum.org/religious-advocacy-directory/annual-advocacy-expenditures/asc/

It even has links to all the orgs.

As your top 8 shows, two Jewish groups account for $100m in expenditures. They're not lobbying for the right wing social issues. Otherwise, right wing social advocacy groups dominate the top of the list. However, if you look at the complete list you see most (by eyeballing it) organizations in the 11+ positions advocating for traditional liberal social issues like anti-poverty, anti-discrimination, social justice, etc.

Ilsa

(61,695 posts)
25. That's why I only give to causes, not churches.
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 06:11 PM
Jan 2014

Even earmarking a tithe for something frees up money for misuse through lobbying.

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
29. I don't have much to spare being I'm on social security but when
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 07:00 PM
Jan 2014

I do I go to the park and give it to a homeless person. I've decided to cut out the middle man since they seem to use my paltry $5 or $10 on postage and fliers to beg me for more money. I think the homeless person get more out of my contribution even if he spends it on wine or cigarettes.

Ilsa

(61,695 posts)
31. I agree. The causes I give to directly benefit
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 07:32 PM
Jan 2014

someone very much in need. Sometimes it's to someone begging for help.

I'm not going to contribute to some huge salary of a preacher or upkeep of a big building for a church. It just doesn't mean anything to me, and that's after a long childhood of attending church. Our own financial position is tenuous.

 

another_liberal

(8,821 posts)
36. So, for every dollar they spend on lobbying . . .
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 11:03 PM
Jan 2014

They save about one hundred eighty dollars in taxes. Not a bad racket at all.

Enthusiast

(50,983 posts)
43. That was deeply disturbing to me,
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 07:16 AM
Feb 2014

when the President continued the obviously unconstitutional faith based initiatives. It was one of the President's first actions, or non-actions. At the time I thought, "My God, doesn't the President recognize how fundamentally wrong this is?"

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
57. Oh yeah, it would have been wonderful to try to defend that change considering the sources
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 03:49 PM
Feb 2014

who already claim that Obama is a socialist muslim, black liberation theologian christian, atheist, terrorist. (and say all of that exactly that way without a shred of irony)

Killing that program, Unconstitutional as it is, would have been like throwing gasoline on the fire of that whole mess.

Theyletmeeatcake2

(348 posts)
41. I'd like to see the receipts and see who they've bought!!!
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 06:00 AM
Feb 2014

This is corruption, pure and simple. Who gets the money???

Ms. Toad

(34,076 posts)
44. Here's one of those corrupt groups you are talking about:
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 08:52 AM
Feb 2014

FCNL.org It accounts for 3.6 million of that amount.

Here's our policy statement:

http://fcnl.org/assets/policy/policy2013.pdf

Just one snippet:

The people of the United States continue to live with the legacy of slavery and institutional racism. Many groups experience ongoing discrimination, and we must continue to seek reconciliation and remediation. While each person must examine unintended, unrecognized personal racism, the federal government has a special responsibility to establish policies that acknowledge our history and create genuine equality of opportunity. These include measures to assure voting rights and political voice; to transform our criminal justice system; to protect civil rights; to promote educational, economic, and employment opportunities and to free communities


As to the inflammatory issues which the poster suggests that money is being used for:

Abortion:
FCNL takes no position and does not act either for or against abortion legislation. On occasion FCNL may appeal to lawmakers not to use the abortion debate to paralyze action on other legislation.


Bioethics: No specific position. Should an issue arise which falls within the umbrella of other concerns we have a position on, any advocacy would be consistent with those other positions (see the entire policy statement).

Contraception:
For a better world community, more attention is necessary to the human rights of women and children, including adequate nutrition, education, health care, voluntary family planning and economic security



Links to the financial statements for several years - http://fcnl.org/about/finances/

The organization is well respected for integrity and depth of research by members on both sides of the political aisle. Many members of Congress (even those who don't vote the way we would like), call on FCNL to provide them with information they can rely on to be accurate if the subject area is among those we lobby on. We don't buy anyone. The money goes to fund lobbyists (and no money passes through to those lobbied), to do the research which allows us to have influence far beyond the number of Quakers who exist in the US, and to support grass roots lobbying efforts.

If you have questions, feel free to ask. I'm on the governing board.

Theyletmeeatcake2

(348 posts)
47. That's good that you do that and pats on the back...
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 09:37 AM
Feb 2014

But don't you see this system is wide open to cash getting flung about to influence people.I may be wrong but I've heard that cheques are written out on the house floor to politicians to vote a certain way..maybe I've misheard this ??? Anyway religions should pay tax if they are going to butt into policy direction ...

Ms. Toad

(34,076 posts)
61. Why religions, and not other 501(c)(4) groups?
Sun Feb 2, 2014, 01:57 AM
Feb 2014

501(c)(4) groups include a wide variety of groups - not just religious. The broad category is: Civic Leagues, Social Welfare Organizations, and Local Associations of Employees. This includes a lot of groups on all sides of the political spectrum. On the left, this includes MoveOn.org, NARAL, Bread for the World, Equality Ohio, just to name a few.

There is no reason to prohibit faith based organizations from the tax exempt status which is available to all other organizations (most of which are not faith based) which are willing to abide by the same restrictions on their activity.

Theyletmeeatcake2

(348 posts)
62. Some of those groups you talk about do good things ! I don't know if registers are kept
Sun Feb 2, 2014, 04:56 AM
Feb 2014

Of donations to these groups...I am just highly sceptical of allowing groups set up for various causes becoming gravy trains for dubious CEO s and the like....seems a good career path to set up a religion(Scientology being a good example!!).Therfore as long as there is proper oversight I'm all for people getting helped out...I know politicians have bastardised the system to the extent they have too much say in what happens....again not a bad thing if the people involved are virtuous and true but that sounds like pissing into the wind...keep on trucking..

 

packman

(16,296 posts)
49. You people are misinterpreting this
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 11:36 AM
Feb 2014
all those dollars were spent by the various religious groups to twist the arms of the congress and to help them see the light in passing bills to help the poor, feed the hungry, clothed the naked, provide subsidence for the indigent, and shelter the homeless. How petty to think otherwise-after all these are men doing the work of God in God's name and that's gotta be good.

MrMickeysMom

(20,453 posts)
51. Absolutely, something is wrong...
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 01:19 PM
Feb 2014

… and this is because they can.

My husband and I pay more taxes then General Motors does, while we're talking about something is wrong.

The burden of payment is unequal… If we're paying more than GE does and the churches get to lobby and MONEY is free speech, what can be NEXT?

 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
52. I think it works like this...
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 01:38 PM
Feb 2014

"Give till it hurts to help the poor and needy, its what Jesus wants."

Then you build your very own little tax exempt kingdom with all the little ole ladies social security, food and rent money. Buy mansions, fancy SUV's, employ your whole family and pay them outrageous salaries. Build that MEGA-church monument to your own ego, buy diamond mines and TV networks that run 24/7 to reel in even more suckers. Sell books with ready made buyers and hawk it on reich wing radio and Fox "news".

Get even more filthy rich by "following" the man who said feed the hungry, care for the poor, heal the sick and not a word about getting paid for it or if they deserve it or not!

Who's disciples had no money but pooled everything they had and gave it to whoever needed it! Freakin socialists!

He also said to these false Christians, let he who is without sin cast the first stone and yet these sinning bastards make a rich living throwing stones 24/7.

And of course lobby the same government you call anti-Christ for even more tax breaks and special privileges!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Something is very wrong.....