General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhisp
(24,096 posts)adirondacker
(2,921 posts)Good one!
Cleita
(75,480 posts)and religion monitoring the sermons and auditing the books to make sure they are following the law just like the inspectors do at your favorite restaurant. It doesn't have to be every day just like in restaurant just every now and then unless there are complaints just to make sure they are compliant. I would have the IRS audit their books every other year to verify their non-profit and tax free status as well.
silverweb
(16,402 posts)cbayer
(146,218 posts)causes.
The prohibitions are for endorsing specific candidates.
I doubt that you want to remove the tax status from your favorite organizations that advocate and lobby for causes your support.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)sure that this privilege isn't abused and many right wing organizations have seen church as a place to promote their agenda because of the lack of oversight.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)I think the IRS has been extremely lax and needs to get on this.
I just don't want to throw the baby out with the bathwater.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)seveneyes
(4,631 posts)I'm thinking it would be very expensive.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)with benefits and job security. We do need to create jobs and this is one way. Before the gangster caucus of the GOP cheated their way to cushy jobs in our government, undermining our government civil service organizations that served to administer services and enforce our laws we had a pretty good America in the cogs and wheels functions of our governments.
dhill926
(16,349 posts)an awful lot of poor folks with that money .
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)11 Bravo
(23,926 posts)Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)redwitch
(14,945 posts)You CAN petition Congress with the almighty dollar.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)cbayer
(146,218 posts)Are they all right wing or are some of them liberal/progressive?
cbayer
(146,218 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)cbayer
(146,218 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)So it is a religious organization? Interesting. Always thought it was just another PAC.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)Political Action Committee...yeah you are 100 correct how ironically curious.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)Council' and the rest. Tony Perkins, hate monger, is at #2. The 'Concerned Women' is an anti choice and anti feminist group.
This should have a thread of its own.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)People are much more interested in an inflammatory headline and a totally misleading graphic.
TBF
(32,071 posts)The churches here in Texas are huge and do an incredible amount of charitable work in the communities as well (as do their members). They should face the same standards as other non-profits - no more or less.
northoftheborder
(7,572 posts)progressoid
(49,992 posts)this sucks.
mathematic
(1,439 posts)It even has links to all the orgs.
As your top 8 shows, two Jewish groups account for $100m in expenditures. They're not lobbying for the right wing social issues. Otherwise, right wing social advocacy groups dominate the top of the list. However, if you look at the complete list you see most (by eyeballing it) organizations in the 11+ positions advocating for traditional liberal social issues like anti-poverty, anti-discrimination, social justice, etc.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)ErikJ
(6,335 posts)wow!
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)Phlem
(6,323 posts)-p
Ilsa
(61,695 posts)Even earmarking a tithe for something frees up money for misuse through lobbying.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)I do I go to the park and give it to a homeless person. I've decided to cut out the middle man since they seem to use my paltry $5 or $10 on postage and fliers to beg me for more money. I think the homeless person get more out of my contribution even if he spends it on wine or cigarettes.
Ilsa
(61,695 posts)someone very much in need. Sometimes it's to someone begging for help.
I'm not going to contribute to some huge salary of a preacher or upkeep of a big building for a church. It just doesn't mean anything to me, and that's after a long childhood of attending church. Our own financial position is tenuous.
90-percent
(6,829 posts)Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Thanks for that. I need to make this a Frank Zappa weekend.
Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)Cha
(297,378 posts)BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)Yes, goddammit. Regulations NOW!!!!
johnnyreb
(915 posts)another_liberal
(8,821 posts)They save about one hundred eighty dollars in taxes. Not a bad racket at all.
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)another_liberal
(8,821 posts)(pardon the pun)
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)progressoid
(49,992 posts)Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)when the President continued the obviously unconstitutional faith based initiatives. It was one of the President's first actions, or non-actions. At the time I thought, "My God, doesn't the President recognize how fundamentally wrong this is?"
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)who already claim that Obama is a socialist muslim, black liberation theologian christian, atheist, terrorist. (and say all of that exactly that way without a shred of irony)
Killing that program, Unconstitutional as it is, would have been like throwing gasoline on the fire of that whole mess.
DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)K&R
Theyletmeeatcake2
(348 posts)This is corruption, pure and simple. Who gets the money???
Ms. Toad
(34,076 posts)FCNL.org It accounts for 3.6 million of that amount.
Here's our policy statement:
http://fcnl.org/assets/policy/policy2013.pdf
Just one snippet:
As to the inflammatory issues which the poster suggests that money is being used for:
Abortion:
Bioethics: No specific position. Should an issue arise which falls within the umbrella of other concerns we have a position on, any advocacy would be consistent with those other positions (see the entire policy statement).
Contraception:
Links to the financial statements for several years - http://fcnl.org/about/finances/
The organization is well respected for integrity and depth of research by members on both sides of the political aisle. Many members of Congress (even those who don't vote the way we would like), call on FCNL to provide them with information they can rely on to be accurate if the subject area is among those we lobby on. We don't buy anyone. The money goes to fund lobbyists (and no money passes through to those lobbied), to do the research which allows us to have influence far beyond the number of Quakers who exist in the US, and to support grass roots lobbying efforts.
If you have questions, feel free to ask. I'm on the governing board.
Theyletmeeatcake2
(348 posts)But don't you see this system is wide open to cash getting flung about to influence people.I may be wrong but I've heard that cheques are written out on the house floor to politicians to vote a certain way..maybe I've misheard this ??? Anyway religions should pay tax if they are going to butt into policy direction ...
Ms. Toad
(34,076 posts)501(c)(4) groups include a wide variety of groups - not just religious. The broad category is: Civic Leagues, Social Welfare Organizations, and Local Associations of Employees. This includes a lot of groups on all sides of the political spectrum. On the left, this includes MoveOn.org, NARAL, Bread for the World, Equality Ohio, just to name a few.
There is no reason to prohibit faith based organizations from the tax exempt status which is available to all other organizations (most of which are not faith based) which are willing to abide by the same restrictions on their activity.
Theyletmeeatcake2
(348 posts)Of donations to these groups...I am just highly sceptical of allowing groups set up for various causes becoming gravy trains for dubious CEO s and the like....seems a good career path to set up a religion(Scientology being a good example!!).Therfore as long as there is proper oversight I'm all for people getting helped out...I know politicians have bastardised the system to the extent they have too much say in what happens....again not a bad thing if the people involved are virtuous and true but that sounds like pissing into the wind...keep on trucking..
packman
(16,296 posts)MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)
and this is because they can.
My husband and I pay more taxes then General Motors does, while we're talking about something is wrong.
The burden of payment is unequal
If we're paying more than GE does and the churches get to lobby and MONEY is free speech, what can be NEXT?
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)"Give till it hurts to help the poor and needy, its what Jesus wants."
Then you build your very own little tax exempt kingdom with all the little ole ladies social security, food and rent money. Buy mansions, fancy SUV's, employ your whole family and pay them outrageous salaries. Build that MEGA-church monument to your own ego, buy diamond mines and TV networks that run 24/7 to reel in even more suckers. Sell books with ready made buyers and hawk it on reich wing radio and Fox "news".
Get even more filthy rich by "following" the man who said feed the hungry, care for the poor, heal the sick and not a word about getting paid for it or if they deserve it or not!
Who's disciples had no money but pooled everything they had and gave it to whoever needed it! Freakin socialists!
He also said to these false Christians, let he who is without sin cast the first stone and yet these sinning bastards make a rich living throwing stones 24/7.
And of course lobby the same government you call anti-Christ for even more tax breaks and special privileges!
defacto7
(13,485 posts)Laelth
(32,017 posts)-Laelth