Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
FCC to Public: Boycott Rush and Leave Us Alone
Surprisingly, given the general lack of response by the FCC to the general public, the federal agency instantly responded to a March 10th letter from Roger Smith, of the broadcast watchdog Sacramento Media Group. Smith complained about the gross imbalance of political viewpoints on the public airwaves in Sacramento, citing a study that Clear Channel stations in Sacramento devote 190 hours per week to Right Wing talk, while devoting not a single minute to any other viewpoint (a model perpetuated throughout 90% of the country.)
The FCC responded with the following: “…broadcast stations enjoy freedom of speech under the First Amendment, and the FCC is prohibited by statute from censoring or dictating program content. The result is that stations are free to air pretty much whatever they want (short of obscenity or indecency) – even if the material is false, misleading, or slanted.” Boy oh boy, what a gutsy statement. For the first time, the agency acknowledges that what comes out of talk radio could well be pure lies. Still, it claims there is nothing it can do about it.
The FCC conveniently forgets the Supreme Court ruling that broadcasters may not engage in “Private Censorship.” In Red Lion Broadcasting v. FCC, 1969, the Supreme Court decided, “the First Amendment does not protect private censorship by broadcasters who are licensed by the Government to use a scarce resource which is denied to others.” Or that “the First Amendment is relevant to broadcasting, but it is the right of the viewer and listener, not the broadcaster, which is paramount.”
There’s plenty the FCC do. It could follow court rulings and require that women and minorities, which own less than 8% of all radio stations be brought up to parity. The Third Circuit Court of Appeals has so ordered; but that would be difficult, and the FCC always takes the easy way, the pro-corporate way out. One simple step would be to require broadcasters to clearly delineate which of their shows are news, and which are opinion, and therefore colored with misinformation. That would be really easy, but not easy enough for the FCC.
Instead, the FCC is hopping on the boycott bandwagon, writing, ” If enough people complain about a station’s programming – and particularly if they are part of an organized boycott of station advertisers – the station could very well change its programming policy.”
The FCC responded with the following: “…broadcast stations enjoy freedom of speech under the First Amendment, and the FCC is prohibited by statute from censoring or dictating program content. The result is that stations are free to air pretty much whatever they want (short of obscenity or indecency) – even if the material is false, misleading, or slanted.” Boy oh boy, what a gutsy statement. For the first time, the agency acknowledges that what comes out of talk radio could well be pure lies. Still, it claims there is nothing it can do about it.
The FCC conveniently forgets the Supreme Court ruling that broadcasters may not engage in “Private Censorship.” In Red Lion Broadcasting v. FCC, 1969, the Supreme Court decided, “the First Amendment does not protect private censorship by broadcasters who are licensed by the Government to use a scarce resource which is denied to others.” Or that “the First Amendment is relevant to broadcasting, but it is the right of the viewer and listener, not the broadcaster, which is paramount.”
There’s plenty the FCC do. It could follow court rulings and require that women and minorities, which own less than 8% of all radio stations be brought up to parity. The Third Circuit Court of Appeals has so ordered; but that would be difficult, and the FCC always takes the easy way, the pro-corporate way out. One simple step would be to require broadcasters to clearly delineate which of their shows are news, and which are opinion, and therefore colored with misinformation. That would be really easy, but not easy enough for the FCC.
Instead, the FCC is hopping on the boycott bandwagon, writing, ” If enough people complain about a station’s programming – and particularly if they are part of an organized boycott of station advertisers – the station could very well change its programming policy.”
http://my.firedoglake.com/suewilson/2012/03/19/fcc-to-public-boycott-rush-and-leave-us-alone/
What the f*ck good is the FCC if its only job - in its own opinion (which it obviously is) is to protect broadcasters/media? Why are our tax dollars paying for essentially nothing, except being force-fed goddamned state-sponsored (evidently) wingnut lies and propaganda - and YES, crap which is OBSCENE and INDECENT like Limbaugh calling women "sluts" and "prostitutes"? Hello.
21 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
= new reply since forum marked as read
But in favor of the FCC... they were really upset about it. 
