General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSharpton starts with that murder of Trayvon Martin
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/story/2012-03-19/neighbrhood-watch-death-trayvon-martin/53655188/1--------------
Justice is coming!!!
LeftofObama
(4,243 posts)I hope so, and I hope it comes soon!
What happened to that young man (Trayvon Martin) is just horrible.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Somewhere else.
flakey_foont
(3,338 posts)Would love to hear Rev. Al's thoughts on that.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)...the shooter would already be on death row.
This, and Florida, is fucked up.
And they will pick our next President.
titaniumsalute
(4,742 posts)There's lots of places this kind of bullshit happens including Florida.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)The Backlash Cometh
(41,358 posts)malaise
(268,999 posts)Excellent coverage from Sharpton. Where are the Feds?
tularetom
(23,664 posts)When you pass a law making it OK to shoot someone if you feel threatened by them and then some racist punk shoots an unarmed black kid half his size you don't get to claim you couldn't have foreseen this.
The Florida legislature and ex governor fat boy bush ought to be charged as accessories in Martin's death.
malaise
(268,999 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)And wearing a hoodie!!!!!
Sadly that's the logic at play here.
malaise
(268,999 posts)Check this
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002442585
The family is calling for justice
jillan
(39,451 posts)These assholes - did you hear what his teacher said about Trayvon?
That he majored in smiles....
malaise
(268,999 posts)was dying to kill someone.
Imagine the asshole is the one with a record. The kid was just a good lil boy.
Imagine the fear of that kid screaming for help in his own neighborhood.
butterfly77
(17,609 posts)Jeb Bush signs "no retreat" into FLA law
Posted by David Hardy · 27 April 2005 07:26 AM
Jeb Bush just signed into law the Florida no-retreat bill, which provides that a person need not retreat from an attack, may "stand his ground" and use deadly force if he reasonably believes he or another person is threatened by death or serious physical injury. (The retreat requirement imposes a restriction on self-defense: in addition to a threat of death or serious injury, the defender had to show they had tried to retreat, or that retreat exposed them to greater danger. Court decisions had already removed that requirement within the defender's home or business).
What's remarkable is the press coverage. It's ... actually pretty balanced. Am I the only one noticing a certain change from the days 10-20-30 years ago, when Brady Campaign or Nat'l Coalition to Ban Handguns could make any claim it wanted and have it favorably reported (Forget having their press releases reprinted as news stories: there was one hiliarious case where it went the other way, an AP story was so one-sided that one gun
Ed Shultz starts with coverage as well.