Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

GoCubsGo

(32,086 posts)
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 03:09 PM Feb 2014

Keystone XL pipeline questions I hear nobody asking.

It's my understanding that the Canadian tar sands oil that is to be transported through the Keystone XL pipeline, should it be built, will be sold on the international market. The fact that it terminates on the Gulf of Mexico indicates that to me. What I want to know is why, if the oil is going to be sold on the international market, why don't they just build that pipeline to the coast of British Columbia? It would be a third of the distance of the proposed pipeline. Most likely, this oil is going to go to China. Why pipe it down to the Gulf, and then halfway around the world, instead of just shipping it out through Vancouver?

IIRC, Canadian PM, Stephen Harper, threw a hissy fit after hearing that there was a possibility that President Obama might reject the pipeline. I keep hearing how safe and wonderful pipeline technology is currently. If it's so safe, what's he afraid of? Why is he so hell-bent on running that shit through our country and not his? I am pretty sure I know the answers. I just don't understand why nobody else is asking these questions.

24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Keystone XL pipeline questions I hear nobody asking. (Original Post) GoCubsGo Feb 2014 OP
refineries RedstDem Feb 2014 #1
The Canadians have refineries. GoCubsGo Feb 2014 #2
Wrong again the reason for the pipeline Finnmccool Feb 2014 #22
BTW google Enbridge northern gateway Finnmccool Feb 2014 #23
No warm water ports and they don't Finnmccool Feb 2014 #3
Exactly. GoCubsGo Feb 2014 #4
Oil tankers have been outlawed Finnmccool Feb 2014 #5
There are ports and refineries in Washington. GoCubsGo Feb 2014 #9
Right they don't want a pipeline Finnmccool Feb 2014 #12
Why are pipeline opponents here seemingly ignoring that? GoCubsGo Feb 2014 #13
Cause people don't care about the environment Finnmccool Feb 2014 #15
I think some do care about the environment. GoCubsGo Feb 2014 #16
Head in the sand? RobertEarl Feb 2014 #14
If Canada wants a pipeline through their Finnmccool Feb 2014 #17
Really? RobertEarl Feb 2014 #18
To a port Earl! Why don't they build a pipeline Finnmccool Feb 2014 #19
The stuff needs to be refined RobertEarl Feb 2014 #21
They have refineries and there's many Finnmccool Feb 2014 #24
Who really buys the most Canadian oil? RobertEarl Feb 2014 #7
The reason for the pipeline is to RAISE Finnmccool Feb 2014 #8
We aren't going to be the ones using it. GoCubsGo Feb 2014 #10
That's not exactly true RobertEarl Feb 2014 #20
We get their oil because they have no other Finnmccool Feb 2014 #11
Only one Phase Left anokaflash Feb 2014 #6

Finnmccool

(74 posts)
22. Wrong again the reason for the pipeline
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 06:40 PM
Feb 2014

Is to raise prices, read their report. We are their only customer because they have no way to ship it. What do you think the P.M of Canada meant when he said " You can't be a super power in energy if you only have one customer"?

Finnmccool

(74 posts)
23. BTW google Enbridge northern gateway
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 06:50 PM
Feb 2014

Then till me the Canadians want a pipeline running through their country.

Finnmccool

(74 posts)
5. Oil tankers have been outlawed
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 03:44 PM
Feb 2014

In Canada west coast ports since the 70s and a pipeline would need to go through a rainforest.

GoCubsGo

(32,086 posts)
9. There are ports and refineries in Washington.
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 03:54 PM
Feb 2014

AFAIK, oil tankers are not outlawed there. The proposed pipeline goes over the biggest aquifer in our country. That's just as bad as going through a rainforest, if not worse. They want the financial benefits of this shit oil, without having to deal with the environmental consequences of getting it to market. (That short of the fact that they ruined a nice, little chunk of Alberta where they're removing it from the ground.) I just really have a difficult time understanding why more opponents of the pipeline are not pointing this out. Why are Americans so eager to put themselves at risk when Canada is not?

Finnmccool

(74 posts)
12. Right they don't want a pipeline
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 04:02 PM
Feb 2014

running through their country or that would've been their first choice. This was plan B

GoCubsGo

(32,086 posts)
13. Why are pipeline opponents here seemingly ignoring that?
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 04:15 PM
Feb 2014

That's what I'm trying to understand. Why do they not point out that the Canadians don't want this pipeline, and it's THEIR oil. Why don't they emphasize that more? I just don't get it. I keep hearing about jobs, too. Wouldn't the Canadians like more jobs, as well? Yet....

Finnmccool

(74 posts)
15. Cause people don't care about the environment
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 04:25 PM
Feb 2014

they think they'll be getting cheaper oil and they are wrong about that too.

GoCubsGo

(32,086 posts)
16. I think some do care about the environment.
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 04:44 PM
Feb 2014

I just don't think they're being given all the facts. I believe that many of the supporters who live in the region where the proposed pipeline will run might be swayed to change their minds if things were presented to them a little differently. I think they'd respond better to "Canada doesn't want to pollute their rainforest with their shit oil. Why are you so willing to let them transport their garbage over your water source, where leaks could render it useless?" than they would to the current argument. Or, in other words, why isn't it being asked, "If this oil is such a great economic thing, why aren't the Canadians keeping the benefits all to themselves?" I just don't get why pipeline opponents are not asking that sort of thing.

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
14. Head in the sand?
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 04:20 PM
Feb 2014

You do know Canada is producing this oil from its tar sands fields?

And they love the money that flows back to them.

The idea that Canada doesn't want this is so devoid of facts that it is incredible.

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
18. Really?
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 06:04 PM
Feb 2014

You don't know where the pipeline starts? You think it starts in Russia, or something?

The US plan is to hookup to the Canadian pipe which starts in the tar sands fields. In Canada, duh.

Finnmccool

(74 posts)
19. To a port Earl! Why don't they build a pipeline
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 06:16 PM
Feb 2014

to their own port? It was pretty clear that was what we were talking about.

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
21. The stuff needs to be refined
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 06:29 PM
Feb 2014

The US has many refineries with pipelines running every which way from them.

Actually, Canada is just part of the whole Big Oil conglomeration. We already are Canada's main oil buyer. This just continues that scheme.

But if we can stop the pipeline, it will cause oil supplies to be pinched, and prices to increase.

Canada loves the US oil addiction.

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
7. Who really buys the most Canadian oil?
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 03:48 PM
Feb 2014

We do. The US. We are Canada's best oil customer. We build this pipeline and we get even more fossil fuels from Canada. They don't need the oil, they have plenty. We, however, are addicted to Canadian oil.

That's why we will get this pipeline.

Whether we vote for it or agi'n it.

Finnmccool

(74 posts)
8. The reason for the pipeline is to RAISE
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 03:53 PM
Feb 2014

oil prices in the Midwest which they clearly state in their 2009 permit application. That's what people should be talking about.

GoCubsGo

(32,086 posts)
10. We aren't going to be the ones using it.
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 03:55 PM
Feb 2014

It is going to be shipped out onto the world market, mostly to China.

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
20. That's not exactly true
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 06:24 PM
Feb 2014

It will end up in US refineries and will be distributed to anybody else who is addicted to oil. Whether they are in China, or Georgia.

Most of Alaskan oil is shipped to the Far East already.

Don't get me wrong. I am opposed to any new source of fossil fuel. But the fact is America is addicted. Even the oily gwb admitted as much <smirk>

We can supply nearly all the energy we need using the sun.

anokaflash

(53 posts)
6. Only one Phase Left
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 03:45 PM
Feb 2014

First we all need to understand the difference between the Keystone Pipeline, and Keystone XL.

The Keystone Pipeline is a 4 phased project, and the 3rd phase was just completed, with only one Phase left, the XL

If you look at the map within the link, below, the XL final phase 4 is the diagonal that runs through Nebraska. The line across the Canadian border, then south through the Dakotas to Nebraska is DONE, the connection to Oklahoma, DONE, the link to the Gulf Coast, recently finished and pumping now DONE.

The final phase, the XL, has been in dispute primarily due to the concerns it may disrupt and polute the main aquifier. This concern seems to be waning. But what most folks don't realize, is this pipeline is over 80% complete and pumping, with just this final link in dispute.


http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/oil-to-begin-flowing-in-southern-leg-of-keystone-pipeline/2014/01/21/ffe35abc-82bb-11e3-bbe5-6a2a3141e3a9_story.html

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Keystone XL pipeline ques...