General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPro tip: DU3 can hide threads by keyword.
My account > trash can > auto-trash by keyword
I've concluded that some threads are only useful as a kind of Rorschach test. Those who are predisposed to believe (or wish) that every man accused of a sex crime is guilty, regardless of the degree to which the incidents in question have been investigated, generally also believe that every person who disagrees with them is a rape/child abuse apologist.
Res ipsa loquitur
Stay away. No good comes from engaging them in conversation. As Hunter S Thompson said: "There was madness in any direction"
Generally speaking, those threads are also irrelevant (at best) or downright counterproductive (at worst) to getting democrats elected.
Jamaal510
(10,893 posts)are a person's best friends on here if they aren't looking to get into any frivolous back-and-forths.
1000words
(7,051 posts)Let's face it, there are some folks who are just itching for drama and use DU as a place to unload their baggage.
snooper2
(30,151 posts)Don't know if it's ever kicked in yet
1000words
(7,051 posts)Two birds. Stone.
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)frazzled
(18,402 posts)I agree with you about avoiding the temptation to engage in threads where there is really no hope of convincing anyone about your point of view, and I try to avoid posting in such threads. Though I'll admit that sometimes (possibly too often) I am weak and post a response anyway. I almost always regret it. I do agree it's best to just move on. Or write a response just to get your viewpoint down in writing and off your chest, and then delete it before clicking the post button. I can't tell you the number of times I do that.
But is it a good idea in general to hide threads you disagree with? Isn't that like putting your fingers in your ears or your head in the sand? Isn't it better to know what people here are thinking? Do we all want to create our own insular paradises, in which we only have to see or hear what we want to see or hear?
I real life, it's kind of possible to do that. I am not going to invite someone to dinner whose ideas I disagree with thoroughly, or who I know will make me mad. We choose friends who are generally in sync with our own beliefs. Or we avoid topics on which there might be disagreement. And when we do disagree in a conversation, it's done in an agreeable way.
But I don't think it's always a good idea to cut yourself off from all the unpleasant things in life. You can, for instance, never step foot in the impoverished neighborhoods in your city, pretending that everything is lovely, but you will be missing something really important or just fooling yourself.
I wish there were a way to have disagreements on a subject here in a rational, respectful way. I wish there were a way to disagree vehemently with someone but not hate that person. Everyone here is just an anonymous cipher, on whom you can project all kinds of bad motives (I think you did that in your OP, just as you think others have done to you). I wish there were a way to picture that person across the dinner table from yourself, having the same disagreement. But I guess I'm just dreaming.
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)I use it to hide threads in which I know that those with whom I disagree will behave in predictably disagreeable and antisocial ways.
There are some topics that cannot be discussed without being baited and accused of all manner of corrupt, depraved and sick motivations. Those who do the baiting and accusing are occasionally and infrequently censured... but when they are, a candlelight vigil is held on their behalf.
NightWatcher
(39,343 posts)Will someone be so kind as to check back in and let us know when we can remove "woody", "farrow", and the like from our trash thread list? I'm afraid I'll miss some breaking Woody Harrelson news. (you serious, Clark?)
edbermac
(15,942 posts)Like a car wreck you have to slow down to just look at the carnage.
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)At some point it becomes a rerun, then it becomes retro-kitsch, then it becomes ancient history.