rand paul: Democrats should disown ‘sexual predator’ Bill Clinton
mr paul seems a little obsessed, eh?
Asked on Newsmax TV whether Clinton is an unsavory character, Paul repeated his assertion that the former president is a "sexual predator."
"Yeah, I mean, a predator -- a sexual predator, basically. Repetitive," Paul said. "There's ... at least a half a dozen public women who have come forward. Some of them did sue in the
(workplace)."
Paul added that Democrats who praise Clinton should take a hard look at his affair with Monica Lewinsky -- something Paul argues would be grounds for serious sanctions in other workplaces due to Lewinsky's status as an intern.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2014/02/06/rand-paul-democrats-should-disown-sexual-predator-bill-clinton/
= new reply since forum marked as read
I don't disagree with you I was only stating the obvious
I am sooo stealing that! 
He was impeached. This has been over and done with for awhile.
He seems to be repeating this story to anyone who is willing to listen. What he doesn't get is that the American public already passed judgment on Bill. He left office with the highest approval rating of any president in years. His popularity has only grown ever since.
Rand is becoming a sorry joke. People know that married couples are comprised of two separate individuals. Since when is the wife responsible for the actions of the husband? If he's implying that Hillary would not be a viable presidential candidate because her husband received certain sexual favors from a willing woman back in the 90s, then he should just stay out of the race in 2016. This strategy is not only asinine, it is also sexist and offensive. If Hillary wanted to, she could smack down this little weasel so hard that the squirrel that sits on top of his head would run away in fear.
