Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(72,022 posts)
Fri Feb 7, 2014, 11:43 PM Feb 2014

Charles P. Pierce: The Environmental Hellscape - The Keystone Pipeline Is (Basically) On

Mr Pierce uses the language magnificently.

"Keystone XL pipeline, the proposed continent-spanning death funnel that would bring the world's dirtiest fossil fuel from the environmental hellscape of northern Alberta down through the richest farmlands on the planet all the way to refineries in Texas, and thence to the world."


The Keystone Pipeline Is (Basically) On
By Charles P. Pierce on February 7, 2014

Photo Illustration by DonkeyHotey via Flickr/Special to The Politics Blog

The ducks are lining up in a very pretty row regarding our old friend, the Keystone XL pipeline, the proposed continent-spanning death funnel that would bring the world's dirtiest fossil fuel from the environmental hellscape of northern Alberta down through the richest farmlands on the planet all the way to refineries in Texas, and thence to the world. Ed Schultz is running the bullshi...er...ball on liberal MSNBC. Progressive champion Brian Schweizer is on board; what the hell, they're not going to take his land to build it. The State Department's cheesecloth "environmental" study is being treated as dispositive, not least by former Energy Secretary Ken Salazar, and AFL-CIO president Rich Trumka's on board, as well, guaranteeing that the stupid stand-off within progressive politics between organized labor and the environmental movement will go on for another decade, because we all know how helpful that has been. And, just for entertainment's sake, here's Glenn Kessler at the Washington Post being baffled by the jobs numbers, which all have been fake from the beginning because TransCanada, the company that wants to build the pipeline, cannot be trusted. And the State Department's numbers, as the National Resources Defense Council makes clear, are one big ball of fudge. You simply cannot make the case for this monstrosity on the basis of economic stimulus, unless you count the strippers. Are we counting strippers?

................

I think the deal has gone down. Some late Friday afternoon, the president and John Kerry are going to stick their heads out the window and whisper, "We gonna build this sucker," and then blow town. This is what will happen next. There will be massive civil disobedience all along the length of the pipeline. It will get built. TransCanada, as is its historic pattern, will then neglect to maintain it and it will leak, badly. The environmental damage will be massive and lasting. All over western Canada, which has stood firm against running this creature through its territories, people will chuckle wisely at what suckers we all were. And important pundits -- and fact checkers -- will tell us nobody could have predicted this.


Read more:
http://www.esquire.com/blogs/politics/The_Bag_Job_Is_Nearly_Complete

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Charles P. Pierce: The Environmental Hellscape - The Keystone Pipeline Is (Basically) On (Original Post) kpete Feb 2014 OP
"Make No Mistake... only by destroying the environment..." MannyGoldstein Feb 2014 #1
Obviously not. Nt newfie11 Feb 2014 #2
I suspect the DEMS will time Keystone for October, just in time to hand over the Elections to the blkmusclmachine Feb 2014 #3
(Basically)? sheshe2 Feb 2014 #4
Basically means, in this case, in every sense, except it's not been made official............yet. CaliforniaPeggy Feb 2014 #5
it is disgusting that there are Democrats supporting this Agony Feb 2014 #6
Pompous prick Oreally called it ... MindMover Feb 2014 #7
How fast will the apologists here get on board with it... villager Feb 2014 #8
then the democrats get no more money from me MFM008 Feb 2014 #9
ah huh Whisp Feb 2014 #10
 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
1. "Make No Mistake... only by destroying the environment..."
Fri Feb 7, 2014, 11:47 PM
Feb 2014

"can we save the environment..."

Is there anything - anything at all? - that our President won't do for the wealthiest? Anything?

 

blkmusclmachine

(16,149 posts)
3. I suspect the DEMS will time Keystone for October, just in time to hand over the Elections to the
Sat Feb 8, 2014, 12:01 AM
Feb 2014
Tea Party Republicans.

It's 11-Dimensional Chess, bay-bee!!

Agony

(2,605 posts)
6. it is disgusting that there are Democrats supporting this
Sat Feb 8, 2014, 12:44 AM
Feb 2014

"Progressive champion Brian Schweizer is on board"

Schweitzer and his buddy (his words) Harold Hamm oil billionaire GOP Romney supporter.

http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/dem-thinks-he-can-win-the-anti-obama - scroll down to just above the poll and watch the video where Schweizer brags about fracking and his friendship with Harold Hamm...

FFS how is it that a Democrat, that is somehow a progressive environmentalist?, is considered presidential material and supports KXL and fracking?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/for-oil-driller-harold-hamm-bakken-boom-brings-more-billions-and-a-chance-to-dabble-in-politics/2012/08/12/3906740a-e227-11e1-ae7f-d2a13e249eb2_story.html

Agony

MFM008

(19,820 posts)
9. then the democrats get no more money from me
Sat Feb 8, 2014, 02:06 AM
Feb 2014

I broke my piggy bank to give steady donations to dems in both elections. If Obama appproves this (my red line) no democrat gets another penny. I will encourage friends and family to do the same. Go ahead, lose us small money consistant donors. What the hell, if you cant count on democrats to hold a line it doesnt matter.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Charles P. Pierce: The En...