Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

CTyankee

(63,912 posts)
Sun Feb 9, 2014, 08:57 PM Feb 2014

Oh, Paul Krugman, here is why I love you!

his blog today in the NYT:

Feb 9, 7:21 pm 1
Who’s Savvy Now?

Via Digby, Jay Rosen has a very good piece on how some reporting on the CBO report was distorted by what he calls the “cult of the savvy”. It goes beyond what I said about second-order journalism; Rosen argues that there’s a value system at work, where being in the know about political maneuvering is considered all-important, whereas understanding the actual policy issue is for the drones.

The thing is, my read — and yes, I’m doing a bit of second-order journalism myself for a moment, but bear with me — is that the CBO affair actually ended up hurting Republicans. By the end of the week a barrage of press reports, plus those mighty figures Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert, had effectively changed the story from “CBO predicts massive job losses” to “Republicans lie about CBO report.” In reality, it’s unlikely that it would have mattered at all even if the first story had stuck. But to the extent that such things matter at all, Republicans ended up losing the week.

So the savvy cultists were wrong even on their own terms. And notice why they were wrong: It never occurred to them that understanding the real issues might matter, and so they were caught completely off guard when Republican lies about policy matters produced a backlash.

So here’s a radical thought: Maybe the truly savvy thing is to take policy seriously, not to pretend that it’s all a game, and that only you understand the rules?

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

CTyankee

(63,912 posts)
2. cashing their paychecks and doing precious little work to deserve them, IMO...
Sun Feb 9, 2014, 09:05 PM
Feb 2014

and in Dr. K's.

At least, Paul Krugman has standards...he does his homework, unlike some of his more notable detractors...(are you listening Joe Scarborough?)...

malthaussen

(17,204 posts)
3. But the point is, they have different standards...
Sun Feb 9, 2014, 09:08 PM
Feb 2014

... of course, I'm assuming and inflicting my own cynical assessment on these turkeys, but their desire is not to do something brave and true, but to make a lot of money. Whereas Mr Krugman would appear to have an earnest desire to seek the truth.

But that doesn't pay well. Hell, I've been seeking truth all my life, and I'm one inch from the street.

-- Mal

CTyankee

(63,912 posts)
4. that is exactly what he is saying and why I love him so much!
Sun Feb 9, 2014, 09:11 PM
Feb 2014

He is constantly out there debating them, both on the political front and as an economist (you can get completely lost in his blogs labeled "wonkish," so don't try...but understand that this is what he DOES as an economist).

 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
5. Sorry, but neither the Republicans nor the Third Way Democrats are interested in discussing policy.
Sun Feb 9, 2014, 09:27 PM
Feb 2014
 

TheMathieu

(456 posts)
7. Chris Cillizza was one of them... talking about how bad it was for Dems.
Sun Feb 9, 2014, 09:35 PM
Feb 2014

He's one of the most annoying hacks of all.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Oh, Paul Krugman, here is...