a legal medical procedure and no one should feel that they have to justify her choice.

Second of all, doesn't it just seem like they want to have their noses all up in everybody's sex life?

then that should be it....

The perpert gets protected in court to prevent their civil rights from being ciliates and the victim gets treated very badly.

than believe a rapist.

I cannot believe the twisted logic that I see here. I guess that means that the woman will have to questioned in detail about all the recent relationships she has had. If married or in a relationship how many times she has had a relationship.

Somehow the rapist becomes irrelevant. I feel like I am in the twilight zone now.

it used to be required that a woman PROVE rape; i.e, she had to show that she fought off, with physical bruises, a rapist. Otherwise, they assumed that she CONSENTED TO IT. Just dressing provactively, was enough to show that she was "asking for it".

I feel like I am living in a time wrap here. Am I really THIS OLD for others to have never heard of this before?

If he thinks forcible sex in a marriage is 'normal relations' I pity his wife. Her life has undoubtedly been hell.

I will not say what I am thinking I would like to have happen to every one of these brain-dead di*ks because I refuse to put it in print. Suffice to say, it would be slow, excruciating, and endless.