Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Botany

(70,614 posts)
Tue Mar 20, 2012, 08:26 PM Mar 2012

USA Today: Ballots too big in at least 25 Illinois counties

CHICAGO (WTW) — Nearly a quarter of Illinois' 102 counties grappled Tuesday with primary ballots too large to fit into scanning machines — a glitch affecting hundreds, if not thousands of ballots that was expected to slow vote counting in some areas.

The problem apparently did not originate directly with two companies supplying the voting systems but with a graphics company that printed the ballots, said Rupert Borgsmiller of the Illinois State Board of Elections. Borgsmiller said he did not know how many ballots were affected, but with the problem affecting 25 counties plus the city of Aurora, he said.

One of the two companies, Lisle-based Governmental Business Systems, said it scrambled to help fix the problem, which in some cases meant trimming the ballots down to the proper size.

"They were printed elsewhere, but we are accountable," said Chris Riggall, of Governmental Business Systems, which was responsible for voting systems in nine counties.

*******************
Prediction ... Romney will win big in Illinois.

Conspiracy .... the fix is in for Romney

???? ...... Now they didn't know that the ballots to be read didn't fit the scanning machines until tonight?


This fall whenever and where ever you can vote on paper .... either early or on a paper ballot @ you precinct.

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
USA Today: Ballots too big in at least 25 Illinois counties (Original Post) Botany Mar 2012 OP
Somebody didn't test the ballots before the election. liberal N proud Mar 2012 #1
I have worked many elections and you always test the systems first Botany Mar 2012 #2
They are paper ballots and easy to read mucifer Mar 2012 #3
Wow, the fix is totally in....lol n/t Firebrand Gary Mar 2012 #4
Smells like Dirty Tricks. yellerpup Mar 2012 #5
I'm an IL voter and at least in my polling place, you circle the names cherish44 Mar 2012 #6
Now, they will "have to" switch to paperless voting for the General Election. n/t Ian David Mar 2012 #7
18 FEET, not 18 inches!!! arcane1 Mar 2012 #8
No problem, hand count them, as it should be anyway. Scuba Mar 2012 #9

Botany

(70,614 posts)
2. I have worked many elections and you always test the systems first
Tue Mar 20, 2012, 08:33 PM
Mar 2012

this is cook book simple .... such and such machine can handle xxx type of ballot.

The scanners come with specs. as per the size and type of ballot that the machine
can handle.

cherish44

(2,566 posts)
6. I'm an IL voter and at least in my polling place, you circle the names
Tue Mar 20, 2012, 08:59 PM
Mar 2012

I figured they were all hand counted...we are a small town though....ah well

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»USA Today: Ballots too b...