Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
Fri Feb 14, 2014, 11:03 AM Feb 2014

When did PBS become the Plutocratic Broadcasting Service?

http://www.salon.com/2014/02/13/when_did_pbs_become_the_plutocratic_broadcasting_service_partner/


John Arnold (Credit: AP/J. Scott Applewhite/Pat Sullivan)

In a world of screaming cable television hosts and partisan media outlets, PBS is supposed to be the last refuge for honest news. This is ostensibly why taxpayers still contribute money to the public broadcasting system. That money is appropriated to try to guarantee that there remains at least one forum for unvarnished facts, even if such facts offend those with money and power.

The problem, though, is that because our government spends so little on public media as compared to many other industrialized countries, our most prominent public media outlets are becoming instruments for special interests to launder their ideological agenda through a seemingly objective brand. Starved for public resources, these outlets are increasingly trying to get their programming funded with money from corporations and wealthy political activists — and that kind of cash comes with ideological expectations.

Case in point is the Public Broadcasting Service, as evidenced by the major report we published this week at PandoDaily. In that story, we meticulously documented how PBS’s flagship affiliate, WNET of New York, solicited funding from former Enron trader John Arnold. The $3.5 million Arnold contributed was earmarked for a “Pension Peril” series now airing in PBS NewsHour broadcasts on stations throughout the country.

If that was the entire story, it might not be much of a story. However, at the same time the billionaire Arnold is funding PBS’s pension-related coverage, he is also sponsoring the nationwide legislative push to slash public employee pension benefits. Indeed, with his massive contributions to super PACs, think tanks and local front groups, Arnold is financing a national movement to convince legislators to, in the words of his foundation, “stop promising a [retirement] benefit” to public workers.
30 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
When did PBS become the Plutocratic Broadcasting Service? (Original Post) xchrom Feb 2014 OP
For decades, they've been under threat from the right, who call t hem liberal and threaten to cut Agnosticsherbet Feb 2014 #1
Haven't you noticed how the repukes don't attack PBS/NPR anymore? 2banon Feb 2014 #21
yep been a long while since those old harping attacks ceased rurallib Feb 2014 #28
When they started accepting money from the Koch's? L0oniX Feb 2014 #2
That was stupid of them . . . another_liberal Feb 2014 #11
Does financial support of the coverage impact the slant of the coverage? Octafish Feb 2014 #3
It is still better than others PowerToThePeople Feb 2014 #4
Koch Bros. and other philanthropic foundations that can be traced back Cleita Feb 2014 #5
many, many years ago reddread Feb 2014 #6
Something akin to corporate jury-tampering. K and R n/t Smarmie Doofus Feb 2014 #7
They already tamper with juries, they are way ahead of you! Dustlawyer Feb 2014 #14
Unbelievable, I didn't know about that. They have their dirty hands in sabrina 1 Feb 2014 #24
Dirty little hands indeed. The Chamber is the biggest contributer in Judicial elections in the Dustlawyer Feb 2014 #25
It's shameful, really. And no one seems to want to do anything about it. No matter how many election sabrina 1 Feb 2014 #29
When they had to go hat in hand to Koch's of this world for endowments to function. TheKentuckian Feb 2014 #8
Let's not forget what's become of NPR, too brentspeak Feb 2014 #9
Reagan started the attack Demeter Feb 2014 #10
Oh ya. fleabiscuit Feb 2014 #12
PBS lost it's integrity the day that Koch was named to their board. lark Feb 2014 #13
I don't think there is a Koch on PBS's board, nor on CPB's board. The only public broadcasting El_Johns Feb 2014 #19
Ah, yes, now I remember. lark Feb 2014 #22
locally i noticed a big change when questionseverything Feb 2014 #15
The real push 2naSalit Feb 2014 #16
Sometime in the 80's-90's the R's forced changes in the charter as I recall..... grahamhgreen Feb 2014 #17
Reagan era. El_Johns Feb 2014 #18
Gee Salon, where the hell have you been all these years? 2banon Feb 2014 #20
I always thought it was the Petroleum Broadcasting Service swilton Feb 2014 #23
In the Bush years, they really put their hooks in. nt MADem Feb 2014 #26
Since we stopped being citizens and became nothing more than consumers. Lint Head Feb 2014 #27
Kicked and recommended a whole bunch.....nt Enthusiast Feb 2014 #30

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
1. For decades, they've been under threat from the right, who call t hem liberal and threaten to cut
Fri Feb 14, 2014, 11:07 AM
Feb 2014

of funds. Many of their major donors are big corporations. (Just listen to the mini ads they give.) Though they are not a full blown corporatist propaganda tool, that kind of intimidation has had an affect.

 

2banon

(7,321 posts)
21. Haven't you noticed how the repukes don't attack PBS/NPR anymore?
Fri Feb 14, 2014, 02:28 PM
Feb 2014

I haven't heard any serious attacks on Public Broadcasting in the past several years, particularly since 9/11, and most especially since the Iraq War.

rurallib

(62,434 posts)
28. yep been a long while since those old harping attacks ceased
Fri Feb 14, 2014, 10:41 PM
Feb 2014

I hardly listen to NPR anymore. And PBS I only watch a few programs.

 

another_liberal

(8,821 posts)
11. That was stupid of them . . .
Fri Feb 14, 2014, 01:08 PM
Feb 2014

When an NYC public broadcasting station announced it was going to air a film entitled Citizen Koch, the bastards' foundation cut off donations. That left the station in dire straights for operating funds needed to stay on the air.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
3. Does financial support of the coverage impact the slant of the coverage?
Fri Feb 14, 2014, 11:14 AM
Feb 2014

Not that PBS would leave anything out on purpose, other than the fact that Washington is in the banksters' thrall as much as the warmongers'. And that crooks at ENRON bilked all the pension money of their employers. And that preparing public employees for the latest round of fleecing is just another coincidence in the upward transfer of wealth. Other than that, I look forward to complete reportage.

 

PowerToThePeople

(9,610 posts)
4. It is still better than others
Fri Feb 14, 2014, 11:14 AM
Feb 2014

You have to look at everything in the media through U.P. filtering glasses (Ultra Propaganda).

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
5. Koch Bros. and other philanthropic foundations that can be traced back
Fri Feb 14, 2014, 11:15 AM
Feb 2014

to industries that favor right wing policies are providing the lion's share of the funding and is influencing their programming. This has been happening for a couple of decades now. I started noticing the bias in their news programming then.

 

reddread

(6,896 posts)
6. many, many years ago
Fri Feb 14, 2014, 11:21 AM
Feb 2014

VOA tendrils and assaults on Pacifica tell us more about our government's priorities and intents than cries of corporate consolidation.

Dustlawyer

(10,497 posts)
14. They already tamper with juries, they are way ahead of you!
Fri Feb 14, 2014, 01:44 PM
Feb 2014

For years the U.S. Chamber of Commerce has created and owned Courthouse newspapers that are free right outside the jury assembly rooms. Bored citizens waiting around for jury duty can read one sided accounts about all of the frivolous, jack pot justice cases that clog our courts. The one in my hometown is called the Southeasttexasrecord.com. They all have "Record" in the name. The 1st edition of ours had 2 front page stories, med malpractice (doctors leaving the state b/c of frivolous suits) and asbestos (fraudulent asbestos cases everywhere). They handed these outside the courtrooms to the prospective jurors who were being picked for a med-mal case and an asbestos case. Funny how that worked huh?

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
24. Unbelievable, I didn't know about that. They have their dirty hands in
Fri Feb 14, 2014, 07:07 PM
Feb 2014

everything, don't they? We sooooo need some laws to stop this coup. Very clever way to invade and take over a country, first rob as much money as you can, then buy everything.

Dustlawyer

(10,497 posts)
25. Dirty little hands indeed. The Chamber is the biggest contributer in Judicial elections in the
Fri Feb 14, 2014, 09:11 PM
Feb 2014

country. They have turned the lower courts into a Republican farm club and a stopper for civil suits against corporations as well as ultra conservative on social issues.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
29. It's shameful, really. And no one seems to want to do anything about it. No matter how many election
Sat Feb 15, 2014, 12:22 AM
Feb 2014

we've won hoping to get something done about it.

TheKentuckian

(25,029 posts)
8. When they had to go hat in hand to Koch's of this world for endowments to function.
Fri Feb 14, 2014, 12:26 PM
Feb 2014

Can't really be public but dependent on private money without giving up something for that money.

brentspeak

(18,290 posts)
9. Let's not forget what's become of NPR, too
Fri Feb 14, 2014, 12:32 PM
Feb 2014

National Plutocratic Radio, and it's main program, "Planet Money", hosted by one of the most ethically-depraved 1% a$$-kissers in the US, Adam Davidson.

fleabiscuit

(4,542 posts)
12. Oh ya.
Fri Feb 14, 2014, 01:14 PM
Feb 2014

Just another LBJ program along with voting rights that must be destroyed. Dry up the money and let the corporations take it as another privatizing of the public. No dissenting views allowed, good bye Moyers.

 

El_Johns

(1,805 posts)
19. I don't think there is a Koch on PBS's board, nor on CPB's board. The only public broadcasting
Fri Feb 14, 2014, 02:19 PM
Feb 2014

board a Koch has been on to my knowledge is this:


Although a generally low-profile person, David Koch has become controversial in recent years because of his strong conservative and libertarian views, and substantial financial support for political action groups supporting those views. He is also one of the world's leading philanthropists....In 1997, he began serving — and still serves — as a trustee of PBS-member station WGBH in Boston and in 2006 he joined the board of New York's PBS-member station WNET. He resigned from that position just last week, on May 16.

http://www.pbs.org/ombudsman/2013/05/david_koch_and_pbs_the_odd_couple.html


Important stations, but not equal to "PBS" itself.

lark

(23,147 posts)
22. Ah, yes, now I remember.
Fri Feb 14, 2014, 06:16 PM
Feb 2014

Thanks for the correction. He and his brother are like octupii (sp?) - their arms are everywhere, evil plutocrats that they are.

questionseverything

(9,657 posts)
15. locally i noticed a big change when
Fri Feb 14, 2014, 01:50 PM
Feb 2014

pbs had to change to digital

they could not raise the money w/o bank loans.....once the big banks were involved it seemed to go downhill fast

2naSalit

(86,757 posts)
16. The real push
Fri Feb 14, 2014, 01:53 PM
Feb 2014

to mess up NPR was in the early 90s. Clinton had become president, sNewt was rising in power and the "Contract on America" was the new fling for the Rs. I distinctly recall a point in 1994 (Dec. 22 to be exact), sNewt was about to become howler of the House, an NPR reporter was at some event and was bale to shoot a question to the sNewtster. (sNewt was under ethics investigation for taking a $4M advance for an alleged book he wasn't actually writing from one Rupert Murdock who was also having legal issues with government at the time.)

The reporter asked about the $4M and if that wasn't a conflict of interest issue for sNewt given Murdock's legal issues. sNewt's response was, "No, it's not an issue. Mr. Murdock has a problem regarding some rules, so we'll change the rules and then there won't be a problem."

That aired once, was not repeated in the afternoon, can't find it in the archives either. As soon as sNewt was in his howler's seat, he attacked NPR by cutting public funding via the federal budget. Thus, the CPB (Corporation for Public Broadcasting) was born in short order to protect the public broadcasting system. It's all been downhill since.

 

2banon

(7,321 posts)
20. Gee Salon, where the hell have you been all these years?
Fri Feb 14, 2014, 02:23 PM
Feb 2014

PBS : Plutocratic Broadcasting Station. And this article doesn't even begin to really cover it.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»When did PBS become the P...