:kick:

would mean no poverty, corruption, war, profits, GMOs, suburbs, regulatory capture, market-cornering, monopolies, racism, speculation, pollution, income inequality, wealth inequality, big business, or even profit? it's basically Titoism (actually right-liberts are inverted Marxists, but nobody tell 'em that)

#5 and off you go.

When libertarians talk about freedom, it is always important to ask who exactly they mean freedom for, and what kind of freedom. In most cases, when one group of people gains freedom, it comes at the expense of another group. For example, when they advocate doing away with taxes altogether, while that means more money in the pockets of bread-winners (especially the rich), that would lead to social welfare services getting either cut or eliminated. In that sense, people who are less fortunate have less freedom to be able to live their lives comfortably.
That is one reason why I think a truly 100% libertarian government will never be established.

Did I win?

TYY