Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
Sat Feb 15, 2014, 04:22 PM Feb 2014

$1 Billion for Climate Preparedness: The White House Gets It

Theo Spencer’s Blog

$1 Billion for Climate Preparedness: The White House Gets It

Crushing drought in California and the West, paralyzing ice and snow storms east of the Mississippi. We need to prepare for this changing world and President Obama gets it.

The President announced yesterday on a trip to California he will ask Congress to set up a $1 billion Climate Resilience Fund in his proposed budget next month. (My colleague Steve Fleischli wrote an Op-Ed that appeared in the Sacramento Bee about the trip that lays out effective ways to deal with drought).

Among the key points of the President’s plan:

  • Invest in research and unlock data and information to better understand the projected impacts of climate change and how we can better prepare our communities and infrastructure.

  • Help communities plan and prepare for the impacts of climate change and encourage local measures to reduce future risk.

  • Fund breakthrough technologies and resilient infrastructure that will make us more resilient in the face of changing climate.
The White House fact sheet on the plan can be found here. Another White House fact sheet nicely details the drought, climate impacts and the need to cut the carbon pollution that largely causes climate change. That document also lays out the President’s plan to reduce carbon pollution from power plants, our single largest source of carbon pollution. NRDC has an innovative plan to do that as well. The President has formed a Task Force charged with finding effective ways to bolster climate preparedness, which ironically just met this week in California.

The President’s plan to invest $1 billion on climate preparedness is welcome news. But it’s far from the only thing the administration has done to jump start real efforts to prepare for the impacts of climate change. The Environmental Protection Agency is looking at ways to creatively use its resources and work with states to safeguard drinking water supplies and other critical forms of water infrastructure. The Federal Emergency Management Agency is researching how best to integrate sea level rise and the increased risk of flooding into its flood maps. FEMA is also in the process of getting state's to factor in climate change to their State Hazard Emergency Management plans. The President has ordered all Agencies to evaluate their climate risks and coordinate with one another in addressing climate impacts.

The President’s latest announcement will help states and local communities prepare for climate impacts, but keep in mind that $50 billion is being spent in to repair the damage from Hurricane Sandy. Much of the Sandy money is going towards preventive measures that will make the area better prepared for climate impacts, yet it gives you a sense of the stakes at play. (Here’s how we suggest some of the Sandy dollars get spent).

- more -

http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/tspencer/1_billion_for_climate_prepared.html


30 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
$1 Billion for Climate Preparedness: The White House Gets It (Original Post) ProSense Feb 2014 OP
the drought is made worse by President Obama's big fracking support. A lot worse cali Feb 2014 #1
Obama is responsible for the drought. ProSense Feb 2014 #2
It must be his dry wit that is causing the drought. Whisp Feb 2014 #8
Obama blows hot air, I guess. n/t ProSense Feb 2014 #21
try and keep up, pro. In simple terms: cali Feb 2014 #10
Hey, cali ProSense Feb 2014 #12
This message was self-deleted by its author Hissyspit Feb 2014 #19
This! Champion Jack Feb 2014 #26
If the White House really 'gets it' ... Vox Moi Feb 2014 #3
You're ProSense Feb 2014 #6
Does he also have a plan to pscot Feb 2014 #4
It's part ProSense Feb 2014 #5
How many billions in tax breaks for coal and oil? TransitJohn Feb 2014 #7
? ProSense Feb 2014 #9
lol. yeah. that's why he voted for oil and gas to be exempt from cali Feb 2014 #11
What does that have to do with subsidies and the war on coal? ProSense Feb 2014 #13
it has everything to do with drought and farmers. cali Feb 2014 #15
Obama didn't cause the drought no ProSense Feb 2014 #17
This OP is garbage, patronizing, misleading corporate propaganda. woo me with science Feb 2014 #14
One can always tell when the President does something of significant value, ProSense Feb 2014 #16
From your last link ProSense Feb 2014 #18
Could not agree more Champion Jack Feb 2014 #27
Drivel has its fans. n/t ProSense Feb 2014 #28
Kick! n/t ProSense Feb 2014 #20
k&r... spanone Feb 2014 #22
It's 1/10th of 1% of the total cost of the recently passed Farm Bill hatrack Feb 2014 #23
It's also ProSense Feb 2014 #24
LOL, you never cease to amaze me! nt Logical Feb 2014 #25
. ProSense Feb 2014 #29
Question: ProSense Feb 2014 #30
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
1. the drought is made worse by President Obama's big fracking support. A lot worse
Sat Feb 15, 2014, 04:36 PM
Feb 2014

and his EPA lies and deflects and defers to big oil and gas. President Obama supported the hideous legislation that created the Halliburton loophole.

He talks the talk. He doesn't walk the walk.

The NRDC should (and does) know better.



ProSense

(116,464 posts)
2. Obama is responsible for the drought.
Sat Feb 15, 2014, 04:45 PM
Feb 2014

Thanks Obama.

"the drought is made worse by President Obama's big fracking support. A lot worse and his EPA lies and deflects and defers to big oil and gas. President Obama supported the hideous legislation that created the Halliburton loophole. "

Would you prefer that I refrain from posting anything that interrupts the constant anti-Obama posts?

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
10. try and keep up, pro. In simple terms:
Sat Feb 15, 2014, 05:23 PM
Feb 2014

Obama is pushing fracking. His policies have loosened regulations and are a big sloppy kiss to big oil and gas. Fracking, pro pro, intensifies drought conditions.

Post what you like, pro. I'll do the same. What I won't do is stand idly by while you post propaganda that doesn't resemble the truth.

Fracking blamed for drought in California
http://www.cnbc.com/id/101408226

When drought occurs, fracking and farming collide
http://www.denverpost.com/business/ci_25089583/when-drought-occurs-fracking-and-farming-collide





ProSense

(116,464 posts)
12. Hey, cali
Sat Feb 15, 2014, 05:29 PM
Feb 2014
try and keep up, pro. In simple terms:

Obama is pushing fracking. His policies have loosened regulations and are a big sloppy kiss to big oil and gas. Fracking, pro pro, intensifies drought conditions.

...Obama didn't cause the drought. From your link:

Governor Brown opposed a moratorium on fracking last year, arguing it was best for California to produce the oil it uses, and his spokesman, Evan Westrup, declined to comment on whether the drought had changed the governor's mind.


Now, your deflection has nothing to with the OP....not a fucking thing.

Response to cali (Reply #10)

Vox Moi

(546 posts)
3. If the White House really 'gets it' ...
Sat Feb 15, 2014, 04:45 PM
Feb 2014

We'd tell people, outright, that a lot of them - or their kids - are going to have to move.
You can't do much to prepare for you house being underwater or finding that you suddenly live in a desert.
This issue has to move beyond politics, somehow, and soon.

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
6. You're
Sat Feb 15, 2014, 05:07 PM
Feb 2014

"We'd tell people, outright, that a lot of them - or their kids - are going to have to move."

...probably right. Add the climate deniers and why bother?

The White House’s New Plan To Help Farmers Grappling With Climate Change
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024448040

pscot

(21,024 posts)
4. Does he also have a plan to
Sat Feb 15, 2014, 04:48 PM
Feb 2014

recapture the House of Representatives? Because the Teabag Republicans won't pass this.

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
5. It's part
Sat Feb 15, 2014, 04:59 PM
Feb 2014

"Does he also have a plan to recapture the House of Representatives? Because the Teabag Republicans won't pass this."

...of a broad effort, but the $1 billion fund definitely needs Congressional approval.

FACT SHEET: President Obama Leading Administration-wide Drought Response
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2014/02/14/fact-sheet-president-obama-leading-administration-wide-drought-response

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
9. ?
Sat Feb 15, 2014, 05:16 PM
Feb 2014

"How many billions in tax breaks for coal and oil?"

The President has been pushing to end oil subsidies for year, and there is his war on coal.

Last week, it was all smiles at Beyond Coal when the retirement was announced of the giant, much-protested Brayton Point Power Station in Somerset, Massachusetts.

That's the 150th U.S. coal-powered generating plant to go that route since the beginning of 2010. It's the largest remaining coal-burner supplying electricity in New England. It's also one of the filthiest of the nation's power plants, ranked as 14th nationwide out of 378 by the NAACP for its negative impacts on minorities and people of modest means. Protesters have sought to shut the place down for years. In July, 44 were arrested for acts of civil disobedience at the plant.

- more -

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/10/13/1245351/-Shutdown-of-150th-coal-plant-reminder-that-miners-and-related-workers-need-a-just-transition


Federal Investigation Follows North Carolina Coal Ash Spill
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024496344


Still, what do subsidies have to do with the the OP?

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
11. lol. yeah. that's why he voted for oil and gas to be exempt from
Sat Feb 15, 2014, 05:29 PM
Feb 2014

environmental regulations.

http://frackwire.com/halliburton-loophole/

<snip>

The Act was voted on and passed twice by the United States Senate, once prior to conference committee, and once after. In both cases, there were numerous senators who voted against the bill. John McCain, the Republican Party nominee for President of the United States in the 2008 election voted against the bill. Democrat Barack Obama, the current President of the United States, voted in favor of the bill.

<snip>

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_Policy_Act_of_2005#Criticism

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
15. it has everything to do with drought and farmers.
Sat Feb 15, 2014, 05:41 PM
Feb 2014

defensive much, pro?



I like it like that.

you should be.

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
17. Obama didn't cause the drought no
Sat Feb 15, 2014, 05:46 PM
Feb 2014

"it has everything to do with drought and farmers. defensive much, pro? "

...matter how many fake attempts at being endearing you post, cali.





woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
14. This OP is garbage, patronizing, misleading corporate propaganda.
Sat Feb 15, 2014, 05:36 PM
Feb 2014

As long as President Obama is supporting fracking, enabling big oil and gas, selling off the Gulf of Mexico for drilling, and pushing the horrific, predatory TPP that assaults the environment and will allow global corporations to supersede national regulations on business, what you have posted here is disgusting election-year PR rhetoric and nothing else.

You know, it's hard enough to take the constant Third Way/Republican assaults on this country throughout every corporate Presidential term. How sickening on top of that to observe the shameless, Orwellian propaganda machine ignoring the most important, major policy positions to spew swill about concern for the environment during Presidential and midterm election years.


Fracking is a huge environmental and human threat. Why does Obama support it?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024470380

Oil industry wrote State Department report on Keystone
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024487677

2013 In Review: Obama Talks Climate Change–But Pushes Fracking
http://www.democraticunderground.com/112760899

I told myself this couldn't be true: Big Oil and Gas is Exempt from Major Environmental Laws
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024480868

Obama's Oil Expansion Plans: A Clear and Present Danger to Public Safety
http://www.democraticunderground.com/112759747

Video: Romney And Obama Argue About Who Loves Big Oil More
http://www.democraticunderground.com/101768935

Obama and Climate Change: The Real Story
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1014675710
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024190645

WikiLeaks Release: Administration Retreating on Environment in Talks on Pacific Trade
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1014697818

WikiLeaks on the Trans-Pacific Partnership Environment Chapter: "Toothless Public Relations Exercise
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024374847

Obama is determined to push the TPP through despite opposition
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024505012

Leaked TPP Document Reveals No Regard for Environment in Trade Agreement
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1017169842

TYT: Obama Relies On Corrupt Consultants For Crucial Environmental Report
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1017173081

Obama Administration Sells More Than 20 Million Acres in Western Gulf of Mexico for Oil and Natural Gas Exploration and Development
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021896005

Eighteen leading environmental groups demand an end to Obama's "all of the above" energy strategy
http://www.democraticunderground.com/101683340





ProSense

(116,464 posts)
16. One can always tell when the President does something of significant value,
Sat Feb 15, 2014, 05:44 PM
Feb 2014

one that will lead to praise.

Pop out "the list" (as opposed to much maligned "teh list&quot of links that have nothing to do with the OP. The contradictions are funny though.

Bill McKibben Reacts to Latest Keystone XL Environmental Impact Statement

350.org co-founder Bill McKibben issued the following statement this afternoon in response to the latest State Department environmental impact statement on the Keystone XL pipeline:

“The intrusion of reality into this process is really important. The report concluded that in a scenario where we take climate change seriously and regulate climate pollution, this pipeline will indeed have a ‘significant impact’ on climate change. So now we’ll find out if that’s the world Barack Obama and John Kerry want. This report gives President Obama everything he needs in order to block this project. This is the first environmental issue in years to bring Americans into the streets in big numbers, and now they’ll be there in ever greater numbers to make sure the President makes the right call.”

http://350.org/press-release/bill-mckibben-reacts-to-latest-keystone-xl-environmental-impact-statement/

That's the third statement from environmentalists rejecting the media spin.

NRDC: http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024423143#post4
Michael Brune: http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024423143#post5


ProSense

(116,464 posts)
18. From your last link
Sat Feb 15, 2014, 05:57 PM
Feb 2014
And here’s more commentary from Trip Van Noppen, president of Earthjustice, another group that signed the letter:

In addition, “all of the above” leaves the American people holding the bag of drinking water contamination in our communities, crude oil pipeline bursts in our neighborhoods, toxic chemicals in our air, fracking groundwater accidents across the nation, oil spills in our precious Arctic waters and in our seafood-rich Gulf, carcinogenic dumping in our community waters, mountaintop removal across the Appalachians, historic coal ash spills, and more.

Yes, environmentalists are against the “all of the above” strategy.

You'll like this:

Earthjustice Statement on President Obama's State of the Union Address

Washington, D.C. —

The following is a statement from Earthjustice President Trip Van Noppen in response to President Obama’s State of the Union Address:

“We are encouraged that President Obama made climate change a centerpiece of his speech tonight. We applaud his commitment to facing this challenge, for the benefit of our children and grandchildren.

“President Obama has taken courageous actions so far to back this commitment. His leadership in achieving strong clean car standards has been a huge accomplishment, and we are thrilled with his leadership in tackling carbon pollution from power plants, the nation’s largest source of climate change pollution. And tonight, the President went further and affirmed that we can’t allow destructive energy development on our pristine public lands.

“The success of the President’s climate plan and our children's future depends on viewing all fossil fuels decisions through the lens of climate impacts, as the president has said he would do for the Keystone XL pipeline. Those agencies responsible for drilling off our coasts, fracking, mountaintop removal, and fossil fuel exports have to prioritize climate change just as the EPA is doing, and the President needs to ensure that they do.

“An ‘all-of-the-above energy strategy’ cannot work for the President’s own climate action plan and the climate vision he espoused tonight. All energy sources were not created equal. Clean energy is better for our families, communities, future generations, and American competitiveness. The United States should be placing our bets on 'best of the above,' not 'all of the above.' The President rightly called out the need to invest in solar energy that can power our homes and our economy rather than fossil fuels.

- more -

http://earthjustice.org/news/press/2014/earthjustice-statement-on-president-obama-s-state-of-the-union-address

hatrack

(59,587 posts)
23. It's 1/10th of 1% of the total cost of the recently passed Farm Bill
Sun Feb 16, 2014, 10:32 AM
Feb 2014

It's $20 million per state.

It's like the "Climate Hubs", which have no funding or staffing, though I guess having all the brochures in one place might be handy.

And it will never make it through the House of Morons anyway.

Other than that, and the fact that it took five years to get this off the starting blocks, yay!

We are WAY behind the curve, and a rapidly destabilizing climate will not respond to symbolic actions.

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
24. It's also
Sun Feb 16, 2014, 10:41 AM
Feb 2014

It's 1/10th of 1% of the total cost of the recently passed Farm Bill

It's $20 million per state.

It's like the "Climate Hubs", which have no funding or staffing, though I guess having all the brochures in one place might be handy.

...10 times the cost of the military urban training site, $100,000,000, which people would argue is a lot of money.

The White House’s New Plan To Help Farmers Grappling With Climate Change
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024448040

"And it will never make it through the House of Morons anyway. "

It's part of a broad effort, but the $1 billion fund definitely needs Congressional approval.

FACT SHEET: President Obama Leading Administration-wide Drought Response
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2014/02/14/fact-sheet-president-obama-leading-administration-wide-drought-response

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»$1 Billion for Climate Pr...