Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Melissa Harris-Perry Welcomes New Addition to Family On Valentine’s Day... (Original Post) HipChick Feb 2014 OP
I had no idea she was expecting!! pnwest Feb 2014 #1
Same here. TDale313 Feb 2014 #3
I think she had a surrogate or adopted.. HipChick Feb 2014 #4
That's right, I too recall something to that effect. nt arthritisR_US Feb 2014 #8
Yes, i believe she was adopted... Deuce Feb 2014 #11
SWEET! elleng Feb 2014 #2
Aloha elleng~ I checked because of comments being made and turns out Cha Feb 2014 #10
Congrats Loaded Liberal Dem Feb 2014 #5
Amen and Amen uponit7771 Feb 2014 #6
How beautiful! :) nt arthritisR_US Feb 2014 #7
Awwwwwww!!!! Spitfire of ATJ Feb 2014 #9
I met her at Netroots Nation. Nicest person there! Hissyspit Feb 2014 #12
How adorable, Mom and Baby. juajen Feb 2014 #13
Congratulations Melissa, James, Parker & baby "Nerdland". Tarheel_Dem Feb 2014 #14
Celebrities Have the Right to Remain Silent About Their Pregnancies question everything Feb 2014 #15

question everything

(47,510 posts)
15. Celebrities Have the Right to Remain Silent About Their Pregnancies
Sat Feb 22, 2014, 01:46 PM
Feb 2014

Let’s applaud Melissa Harris-Perry. The host of her eponymous MSNBC show just had a baby girl, and in a blog post Tuesday, she was totally transparent about her struggles with fibroids, secondary infertility, and use of a surrogate. “It took two families, three states, four doctors, and five attorneys to get this little girl here,” Harris-Perry writes. “And while our gestational carrier has no genetic tie to our little one, she is now our family.”

While it’s great that Harris-Perry wanted to go public about her experience of “raising a tween and a tot” at 40, as well as her experience of using a surrogate, the key here is that it was her choice to speak out. I’ve been somewhat appalled of late at commentators who say celebrities older than 35 must talk about their struggles to get pregnant, as if they owe it to us.

This has come up in particular in the publicity surrounding The Big Lie: Motherhood, Feminism, and the Reality of the Biological Clock by Tanya Selvaratnam. In an interview with CNN, Selvarantam said, "We see celebrities having kids seemingly without any problems, and we have no idea what they went through. We see the end result, but not the struggle."

Maybe that’s because their struggles are none of our business, unless they choose to make it our business, as Harris-Perry bravely did. In an age when 49-year-old Laura Linney’s pregnancy and subsequent birth is described as a “secret” just because she didn’t start a blog about it on People’s celebrity baby website, we’ve come too far in expecting famous women to expose their private lives to us.

CNN’s Wendy Sachs describes celebrities such as Halle Berry and Uma Thurman seemingly having babies easily after 35 as a “tragic disservice to women” who might think that they, too, can get pregnant without assistance into their 40s. No. Berry is not your biology teacher. There is no shortage of media telling women about how their eggs are shriveling up and dying. It’s a tragic disservice to assume that women can’t learn that there’s a relationship between age and fertility without someone famous telling them so.

http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2014/02/18/melissa_harris_perry_speaks_out_about_her_surrogate_but_every_celebrity.html

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Melissa Harris-Perry Welc...