Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Berlum

(7,044 posts)
Sun Feb 16, 2014, 05:30 PM Feb 2014

Pesticides May Be More Dangerous Than Testing Reveals

Don't be suckered by the Corporate Poo-flinging Attacks, Inc. (R) on organic food that are systematically pimped on DU.



"Testing of pesticides focuses on the active ingredient. But many other “inert” ingredients are added to the pesticide formulation that is actually sold. A new study suggests that these additives can make pesticides more dangerous to cells than current safety testing reveals.

"A team of French scientists has concluded that studies focused solely on the active ingredients of commercially sold pesticides substantially underestimate their potential hazards....

http://www.cornucopia.org/2014/02/pesticides-may-dangerous-testing-reveals-study-finds/

61 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Pesticides May Be More Dangerous Than Testing Reveals (Original Post) Berlum Feb 2014 OP
EPA: Pesticides in Food & health problems Berlum Feb 2014 #1
Effects of pesticides on human health Berlum Feb 2014 #2
A Toxic Tale Berlum Feb 2014 #3
Poison is poisonous. JaneyVee Feb 2014 #4
Who would have thought? Chemisse Feb 2014 #7
And some who post here under contract to Monsanto BanzaiBonnie Feb 2014 #51
Industrial Ag (R) & Big GMO, Inc. (R) are serving you dangerous poisonous crap, often OCCULTLY Berlum Feb 2014 #5
If it is so true that truedelphi Feb 2014 #12
This administration has been a predictable, pro-corporate disaster for the environment & wilderness villager Feb 2014 #15
Toxic Chemical Accumulation in the Human Body Berlum Feb 2014 #6
Wish I could rec your reply. n/t truedelphi Feb 2014 #13
This graphic is very informative BrotherIvan Feb 2014 #24
Sorry, but that graphic is just flat out wrong on salt. NutmegYankee Feb 2014 #59
Be wise. Avoid the Corporately Funded Smear Attacks on Clean Food Berlum Feb 2014 #8
DUrec. bvar22 Feb 2014 #9
k/r solarhydrocan Feb 2014 #10
If aliens exist... tecelote Feb 2014 #11
well, the paid corporate shills here do have to sing for their (chemically-laced) suppers... villager Feb 2014 #14
I have no idea why someone alerted on this post, but they did. Rex Feb 2014 #16
Touched a nerve, I guess? villager Feb 2014 #17
Guess not! Rex Feb 2014 #18
Now, now, let's not go knocking wolves... they're having a hard enough time... villager Feb 2014 #20
Indeed. Berlum Feb 2014 #25
Nothing wrong with scientific materialism; a lot of these "pro-science" guys are pretty anti-science Chathamization Feb 2014 #36
That is the least justifiable alert I have ever seen! another_liberal Feb 2014 #21
What's really telling is that these same folks engage in the most derisive of snark.... villager Feb 2014 #48
probably because it's a copout to believe everyone who disagrees with you is some kind of paid dionysus Feb 2014 #41
like the copout that everyone who disagrees with you is engaging in "woo?" villager Feb 2014 #47
LOL arikara Feb 2014 #49
hypocrisy is added to their list of "virtues!" villager Feb 2014 #53
Because it's a fallacious ad hominem attack, maybe? Lizzie Poppet Feb 2014 #50
and you certainly have expertise in ad hominem attacks! villager Feb 2014 #54
And this, boys and girls, is irony! Lizzie Poppet Feb 2014 #55
My point exactly! villager Feb 2014 #57
K & R malaise Feb 2014 #19
kick fascisthunter Feb 2014 #22
That's cool. CFLDem Feb 2014 #23
Primary intention of my OP was to counter the regular, systematic bashing of sustainability on DU Berlum Feb 2014 #26
So it's just preaching to choir.., CFLDem Feb 2014 #28
Nope. It's countering the Vast Heap of Dangerous Bullshit, Inc. (R) Berlum Feb 2014 #29
You keep bringing up sustainable solutions CFLDem Feb 2014 #30
You've not looked very deep then... Berlum Feb 2014 #31
You're trolling us, right? CFLDem Feb 2014 #37
Free Clues Berlum Feb 2014 #38
Lol ok CFLDem Feb 2014 #42
But your post is nonsense. HuckleB Apr 2014 #61
Imagine that. SamKnause Feb 2014 #27
There is something wrong with a scenario where posters on a progressive Zorra Feb 2014 #32
+1000 G_j Feb 2014 #45
We're only talking about brown-skinned migrant workers here so no big deal. lpbk2713 Feb 2014 #33
My uncle was part of the Chemical War unit in WWII and I have a poster of my own: Farm chemicals jwirr Feb 2014 #34
Very slowly for you MattBaggins Feb 2014 #35
Very slowly back at you: Industrial Ag Synthetic Chemical Poisons are different Berlum Feb 2014 #39
Very very very slowly for you MattBaggins Feb 2014 #40
Thanks for keeping this thread kicked Berlum Feb 2014 #44
That isn't much of an argument gollygee Feb 2014 #46
How about Agent Orange? flamingdem Feb 2014 #43
my father was a farmer and used something like agent orange before it was a weapon. The farmers jwirr Feb 2014 #52
I would guess it caused lymphoma? flamingdem Feb 2014 #56
In my father's case it was lung cancer. jwirr Feb 2014 #58
As anyone who follows this stuff would expect, this is really bad junk science. HuckleB Apr 2014 #60

Berlum

(7,044 posts)
1. EPA: Pesticides in Food & health problems
Sun Feb 16, 2014, 05:32 PM
Feb 2014

Laboratory studies show that pesticides can cause health problems, such as birth defects, nerve damage, cancer, and other effects that might occur over a long period of time. However, these effects depend on how toxic the pesticide is and how much of it is consumed. Some pesticides also pose unique health risks to children.


http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/food/risks.htm

Berlum

(7,044 posts)
2. Effects of pesticides on human health
Sun Feb 16, 2014, 05:33 PM
Feb 2014

Pesticides are designed to kill and because their mode of action is not specific to one species, they often kill or harm organisms other than pests, including humans.



http://www.toxipedia.org/display/toxipedia/Effects+of+Pesticides+on+Human+Health

Chemisse

(30,814 posts)
7. Who would have thought?
Sun Feb 16, 2014, 05:53 PM
Feb 2014

Well, except me and anybody with a half a brain who is unclouded by greed.

BanzaiBonnie

(3,621 posts)
51. And some who post here under contract to Monsanto
Mon Feb 17, 2014, 05:57 PM
Feb 2014

who keep telling us organics are no better than pesticide laden food.

truedelphi

(32,324 posts)
12. If it is so true that
Sun Feb 16, 2014, 07:13 PM
Feb 2014

Industrial Ag is (R) and Big GMO Inc is also (R) then why are so many with D's after their names supporting them?

Including the current occupant of the Oval Office.

And it is not just that Obama supports both Big Ag and Big GmO, he made totally disastrous appointments to the FDA while his wife was out planting her organic garden in the Rose Garden.
By appointing Mike Taylor to head that department at the FDA, Obama ensured that we activists would watch Big Ag and Big GM get bigger and bigger.

For more on Mike Taylor, here's a decent link:

www.foodpolitics.com/tag/michael-taylor/

Not only that, but two summers back, when activists convinced Tom Vilsack, who heads Department of Agriculture, that GM alfalfa should require a designated buffer zone, and Vilsack agreed, Obama immediately sent ten people from the WH over to twist Vilsack's arm into realizing that he either collude with industry and ignore activists desire to have that buffer zone, or else start looking for a different line of work.

 

villager

(26,001 posts)
15. This administration has been a predictable, pro-corporate disaster for the environment & wilderness
Sun Feb 16, 2014, 07:26 PM
Feb 2014

...with the continuing fiddling while Rome/Earth burns.

But there are the intermittent nice speeches!

BrotherIvan

(9,126 posts)
24. This graphic is very informative
Sun Feb 16, 2014, 11:34 PM
Feb 2014

But I do wish they would point out that real salt is not unhealthy and the body needs it for minerals. Excellent info otherwise.

Great work on this thread!

NutmegYankee

(16,201 posts)
59. Sorry, but that graphic is just flat out wrong on salt.
Mon Feb 17, 2014, 08:44 PM
Feb 2014

Sodium is a metal. Salt is an ionic compound made up of 1 sodium atom and 1 chlorine atom.

Berlum

(7,044 posts)
8. Be wise. Avoid the Corporately Funded Smear Attacks on Clean Food
Sun Feb 16, 2014, 05:54 PM
Feb 2014

Don't let yourself be SUCKERED by the onslaught of corporately funded attacks on clean food. If you eat gobs of toxic fungicide, herbicide and pesticide residue year after year after year, it builds up in your body. Eventually, like any polluted system, it will break down. It may take time, but the corporate industrial chemicals designed to kill will eventually fulfill their purpose.

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
9. DUrec.
Sun Feb 16, 2014, 06:41 PM
Feb 2014

All non-naturally occurring pesticides, fertilizers, herbicides, GM crops & seeds are forever banned from our little hilltop.
Planting Broccoli, Spinach, Peas, Lettuce, and maybe some Pontiac Reds tomorrow.

So far, so good.

 

villager

(26,001 posts)
14. well, the paid corporate shills here do have to sing for their (chemically-laced) suppers...
Sun Feb 16, 2014, 07:24 PM
Feb 2014

So it's no surprise at the regular recurrence of the dutiful poo-flinging by them....

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
16. I have no idea why someone alerted on this post, but they did.
Sun Feb 16, 2014, 07:37 PM
Feb 2014

AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service
Mail Message
On Sun Feb 16, 2014, 06:27 PM an alert was sent on the following post:

well, the paid corporate shills here do have to sing for their (chemically-laced) suppers...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=4511986

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

This is a clear attack on other DU posters who follow a science-based view of the world.

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sun Feb 16, 2014, 06:35 PM, and the Jury voted 0-6 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Was this alert a joke? Because I don't find it funny.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: But not a PERSONAL attack.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: You should learn what a proper alert is.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Well, shills do sing, I prefer to turn it off and blame it on the shortcomings of our education system.

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.

 

villager

(26,001 posts)
20. Now, now, let's not go knocking wolves... they're having a hard enough time...
Sun Feb 16, 2014, 08:01 PM
Feb 2014

...under this "change-filled" administration!

Chathamization

(1,638 posts)
36. Nothing wrong with scientific materialism; a lot of these "pro-science" guys are pretty anti-science
Mon Feb 17, 2014, 12:11 PM
Feb 2014

Watch what happens when you show any evidence that there SciFi solutions have numerous problems. Suddenly all the supposed "pro-science evidence based" stuff goes out the window, and they fall back on name calling to avoid the facts at hand.

 

another_liberal

(8,821 posts)
21. That is the least justifiable alert I have ever seen!
Sun Feb 16, 2014, 08:07 PM
Feb 2014

With skin that thin, they'd damn sure better stay away from pesticides themselves.

 

villager

(26,001 posts)
48. What's really telling is that these same folks engage in the most derisive of snark....
Mon Feb 17, 2014, 03:54 PM
Feb 2014

...yet get apoplectic if a mirror is ever turned back in their direction...

dionysus

(26,467 posts)
41. probably because it's a copout to believe everyone who disagrees with you is some kind of paid
Mon Feb 17, 2014, 01:46 PM
Feb 2014

agent of _______.

for disclosure, it wasn't my alert

 

villager

(26,001 posts)
47. like the copout that everyone who disagrees with you is engaging in "woo?"
Mon Feb 17, 2014, 03:52 PM
Feb 2014

I guess the copouts abound!

 

Lizzie Poppet

(10,164 posts)
50. Because it's a fallacious ad hominem attack, maybe?
Mon Feb 17, 2014, 05:11 PM
Feb 2014

It's a pretty classic example of the "shill fallacy" or "poisoning the well." It's not about a specific individual, which is probably the main reason it was allowed to stand.

 

CFLDem

(2,083 posts)
23. That's cool.
Sun Feb 16, 2014, 11:24 PM
Feb 2014

So what's the Berlum solution to practically maintain crop yields without pesticides and fungicides?

Berlum

(7,044 posts)
26. Primary intention of my OP was to counter the regular, systematic bashing of sustainability on DU
Mon Feb 17, 2014, 08:44 AM
Feb 2014

On Sunday I read an OP on DU attacking organic food, and I regarded that posting as highly flawed and suspect, one of a recurring series of assaults on sustainability. So I posted the OP for this thread as a counter balance, and to set the record straight.

As for solutions to the vast, pervasive chemical contamination of our water, our food, our air and our bodies, the world is full of them. Search engines truly are your friend in that regard. Anyone seeking clean, sustainable ways to produce food will find a rich and empowering heap of proven models and resources.

The corporate opposition to these solutions - with misleading agitprop -- in order to maintain control of the food system and a ferocious, fear-driven grasp on PROFITS is, in my view, pervasive, pernicious, and anti-life. It must be challenged.

Berlum

(7,044 posts)
29. Nope. It's countering the Vast Heap of Dangerous Bullshit, Inc. (R)
Mon Feb 17, 2014, 09:52 AM
Feb 2014

...that so systematically trashes sustainable solutions.

I'm not one who can stand by silently while bullshit is being sold, whether that's happening overtly or occultly (R).

 

CFLDem

(2,083 posts)
30. You keep bringing up sustainable solutions
Mon Feb 17, 2014, 10:59 AM
Feb 2014

yet I have yet to hear of any solutions.

Sure there's strategies farmers can use like companion planting to reduce the use of fertilizers, but nothing that wholesale eliminates the need for chemicals and genetic modification necessary for practical large scale farming.

This "sustainable solutions" is only as useful as the warm fuzzy feelings it induces.

Berlum

(7,044 posts)
31. You've not looked very deep then...
Mon Feb 17, 2014, 11:26 AM
Feb 2014

No need for me to try and educate you about sustainable ways to grow clean food. The models are out there in plain sight for anyone who wants to learn or get involved. But that's not what this thread it about. It's about countering the Polluting BS, Inc., and I'm not about to be diverted to meet any one person's educational needs, or do their research for them.

If you sincerely want to learn, you might consider actually doing a little research, or starting your own thread on that topic.





 

CFLDem

(2,083 posts)
37. You're trolling us, right?
Mon Feb 17, 2014, 01:16 PM
Feb 2014

I did plenty of research when I majored in horticulture. Your reticence is only proof that A) there is no sustainable solution, B) you don't believe in the woo enough to evangelize for it, or c) you're joshing us.

Either way this 'sustainable solution' is merely a tepid fart in the wind.

Berlum

(7,044 posts)
38. Free Clues
Mon Feb 17, 2014, 01:27 PM
Feb 2014

That is not what this thread is about.
That is not what this thread is about.
That is not what this thread is about.
That is not what this thread is about.
That is not what this thread is about.
That is not what this thread is about.
That is not what this thread is about.
That is not what this thread is about.
That is not what this thread is about.
That is not what this thread is about.
That is not what this thread is about.
That is not what this thread is about.

Please do start a thread about sustainable, clean farming. That would be great. In the right place.

That is not what this thread is about.
That is not what this thread is about.
That is not what this thread is about.
That is not what this thread is about.
That is not what this thread is about.
That is not what this thread is about.
That is not what this thread is about.
That is not what this thread is about.
That is not what this thread is about.
That is not what this thread is about.
That is not what this thread is about.
That is not what this thread is about.

SamKnause

(13,108 posts)
27. Imagine that.
Mon Feb 17, 2014, 09:16 AM
Feb 2014

Poisoning the food supply could cause health problems.

Poisoning our soil could cause health problems.

Poisoning our water could cause health problems.

Poisoning our air could cause health problems.

Poisoning people could cause health problems.

Poisoning our animals could cause health problems.

Zorra

(27,670 posts)
32. There is something wrong with a scenario where posters on a progressive
Mon Feb 17, 2014, 11:40 AM
Feb 2014

board encourage people to buy and eat pesticide laden food where both the pesticides and food are produced by big agribusiness, snd try to discourage people from eating food that is grown without being sprayed with chemical pesticides, herbicides, or fungicides, has no poisons on it, and that is generally produced on small family farms.

What is wrong with this picture, and what do these posters have to gain by encouraging people to buy and eat pesticide laden foods produced by big agribusiness?

Recommend.

lpbk2713

(42,763 posts)
33. We're only talking about brown-skinned migrant workers here so no big deal.
Mon Feb 17, 2014, 11:46 AM
Feb 2014



of course.


We're still fighting the same fight since the passing of Cesar Chavez without much progress.

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
34. My uncle was part of the Chemical War unit in WWII and I have a poster of my own: Farm chemicals
Mon Feb 17, 2014, 11:59 AM
Feb 2014

were based on Chemicals used in WWII.

MattBaggins

(7,904 posts)
35. Very slowly for you
Mon Feb 17, 2014, 12:00 PM
Feb 2014

Organic...farmers....use...pesticides..too

They just have a silly belief where their combinations of carbon, nitrogen and phosphate are magical and special and not at all like other combinations of carbon, nitrogen and phosphate.

MattBaggins

(7,904 posts)
40. Very very very slowly for you
Mon Feb 17, 2014, 01:44 PM
Feb 2014

Not.......always

Toxicity, LD50, MED, and half life don't care how the bonds between the atoms were made.

Berlum

(7,044 posts)
44. Thanks for keeping this thread kicked
Mon Feb 17, 2014, 03:33 PM
Feb 2014

It's important that people know about the dangers of synthetic chemical pesticides. You are doing a fabulous job.

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
46. That isn't much of an argument
Mon Feb 17, 2014, 03:39 PM
Feb 2014

Hydrogen and Oxygen can make water, or hydrogen peroxide, both made up of hydrogen and oxygen, and it isn't magical that they make two different things.

flamingdem

(39,314 posts)
43. How about Agent Orange?
Mon Feb 17, 2014, 02:35 PM
Feb 2014

Or similar that is dumped in South America and used as a defoliant.

It's not just happening here.

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
52. my father was a farmer and used something like agent orange before it was a weapon. The farmers
Mon Feb 17, 2014, 06:28 PM
Feb 2014

in our area were almost expected to die of cancer.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Pesticides May Be More Da...