General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPesticides May Be More Dangerous Than Testing Reveals
Don't be suckered by the Corporate Poo-flinging Attacks, Inc. (R) on organic food that are systematically pimped on DU.
"Testing of pesticides focuses on the active ingredient. But many other inert ingredients are added to the pesticide formulation that is actually sold. A new study suggests that these additives can make pesticides more dangerous to cells than current safety testing reveals.
"A team of French scientists has concluded that studies focused solely on the active ingredients of commercially sold pesticides substantially underestimate their potential hazards....
http://www.cornucopia.org/2014/02/pesticides-may-dangerous-testing-reveals-study-finds/
Berlum
(7,044 posts)Laboratory studies show that pesticides can cause health problems, such as birth defects, nerve damage, cancer, and other effects that might occur over a long period of time. However, these effects depend on how toxic the pesticide is and how much of it is consumed. Some pesticides also pose unique health risks to children.
http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/food/risks.htm
Berlum
(7,044 posts)Pesticides are designed to kill and because their mode of action is not specific to one species, they often kill or harm organisms other than pests, including humans.
http://www.toxipedia.org/display/toxipedia/Effects+of+Pesticides+on+Human+Health
Berlum
(7,044 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Chemisse
(30,814 posts)Well, except me and anybody with a half a brain who is unclouded by greed.
BanzaiBonnie
(3,621 posts)who keep telling us organics are no better than pesticide laden food.
Berlum
(7,044 posts)truedelphi
(32,324 posts)Industrial Ag is (R) and Big GMO Inc is also (R) then why are so many with D's after their names supporting them?
Including the current occupant of the Oval Office.
And it is not just that Obama supports both Big Ag and Big GmO, he made totally disastrous appointments to the FDA while his wife was out planting her organic garden in the Rose Garden.
By appointing Mike Taylor to head that department at the FDA, Obama ensured that we activists would watch Big Ag and Big GM get bigger and bigger.
For more on Mike Taylor, here's a decent link:
www.foodpolitics.com/tag/michael-taylor/
Not only that, but two summers back, when activists convinced Tom Vilsack, who heads Department of Agriculture, that GM alfalfa should require a designated buffer zone, and Vilsack agreed, Obama immediately sent ten people from the WH over to twist Vilsack's arm into realizing that he either collude with industry and ignore activists desire to have that buffer zone, or else start looking for a different line of work.
villager
(26,001 posts)...with the continuing fiddling while Rome/Earth burns.
But there are the intermittent nice speeches!
Berlum
(7,044 posts)truedelphi
(32,324 posts)BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)But I do wish they would point out that real salt is not unhealthy and the body needs it for minerals. Excellent info otherwise.
Great work on this thread!
NutmegYankee
(16,201 posts)Sodium is a metal. Salt is an ionic compound made up of 1 sodium atom and 1 chlorine atom.
Berlum
(7,044 posts)Don't let yourself be SUCKERED by the onslaught of corporately funded attacks on clean food. If you eat gobs of toxic fungicide, herbicide and pesticide residue year after year after year, it builds up in your body. Eventually, like any polluted system, it will break down. It may take time, but the corporate industrial chemicals designed to kill will eventually fulfill their purpose.
All non-naturally occurring pesticides, fertilizers, herbicides, GM crops & seeds are forever banned from our little hilltop.
Planting Broccoli, Spinach, Peas, Lettuce, and maybe some Pontiac Reds tomorrow.
So far, so good.
solarhydrocan
(551 posts)tecelote
(5,122 posts)They probably consider the human race a cancer killing a beautiful planet.
villager
(26,001 posts)So it's no surprise at the regular recurrence of the dutiful poo-flinging by them....
Rex
(65,616 posts)AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service
Mail Message
On Sun Feb 16, 2014, 06:27 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
well, the paid corporate shills here do have to sing for their (chemically-laced) suppers...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=4511986
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
This is a clear attack on other DU posters who follow a science-based view of the world.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sun Feb 16, 2014, 06:35 PM, and the Jury voted 0-6 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Was this alert a joke? Because I don't find it funny.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: But not a PERSONAL attack.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: You should learn what a proper alert is.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Well, shills do sing, I prefer to turn it off and blame it on the shortcomings of our education system.
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
villager
(26,001 posts)Presumably, shills don't like to be named as such...
I WISH they would learn that you cannot cry wolf when you ARE a wolf!
villager
(26,001 posts)...under this "change-filled" administration!
Scientific Materialist Lynch Mob, Inc. (R). They lurk, waiting to strike.
Chathamization
(1,638 posts)Watch what happens when you show any evidence that there SciFi solutions have numerous problems. Suddenly all the supposed "pro-science evidence based" stuff goes out the window, and they fall back on name calling to avoid the facts at hand.
another_liberal
(8,821 posts)With skin that thin, they'd damn sure better stay away from pesticides themselves.
villager
(26,001 posts)...yet get apoplectic if a mirror is ever turned back in their direction...
dionysus
(26,467 posts)agent of _______.
for disclosure, it wasn't my alert
villager
(26,001 posts)I guess the copouts abound!
the chemical "science" types can dish it out but they can't take it.
villager
(26,001 posts)Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)It's a pretty classic example of the "shill fallacy" or "poisoning the well." It's not about a specific individual, which is probably the main reason it was allowed to stand.
villager
(26,001 posts)Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)villager
(26,001 posts)malaise
(269,112 posts)Human beings are crazy
fascisthunter
(29,381 posts)CFLDem
(2,083 posts)So what's the Berlum solution to practically maintain crop yields without pesticides and fungicides?
Berlum
(7,044 posts)On Sunday I read an OP on DU attacking organic food, and I regarded that posting as highly flawed and suspect, one of a recurring series of assaults on sustainability. So I posted the OP for this thread as a counter balance, and to set the record straight.
As for solutions to the vast, pervasive chemical contamination of our water, our food, our air and our bodies, the world is full of them. Search engines truly are your friend in that regard. Anyone seeking clean, sustainable ways to produce food will find a rich and empowering heap of proven models and resources.
The corporate opposition to these solutions - with misleading agitprop -- in order to maintain control of the food system and a ferocious, fear-driven grasp on PROFITS is, in my view, pervasive, pernicious, and anti-life. It must be challenged.
CFLDem
(2,083 posts)Berlum
(7,044 posts)...that so systematically trashes sustainable solutions.
I'm not one who can stand by silently while bullshit is being sold, whether that's happening overtly or occultly (R).
CFLDem
(2,083 posts)yet I have yet to hear of any solutions.
Sure there's strategies farmers can use like companion planting to reduce the use of fertilizers, but nothing that wholesale eliminates the need for chemicals and genetic modification necessary for practical large scale farming.
This "sustainable solutions" is only as useful as the warm fuzzy feelings it induces.
Berlum
(7,044 posts)No need for me to try and educate you about sustainable ways to grow clean food. The models are out there in plain sight for anyone who wants to learn or get involved. But that's not what this thread it about. It's about countering the Polluting BS, Inc., and I'm not about to be diverted to meet any one person's educational needs, or do their research for them.
If you sincerely want to learn, you might consider actually doing a little research, or starting your own thread on that topic.
CFLDem
(2,083 posts)I did plenty of research when I majored in horticulture. Your reticence is only proof that A) there is no sustainable solution, B) you don't believe in the woo enough to evangelize for it, or c) you're joshing us.
Either way this 'sustainable solution' is merely a tepid fart in the wind.
That is not what this thread is about.
That is not what this thread is about.
That is not what this thread is about.
That is not what this thread is about.
That is not what this thread is about.
That is not what this thread is about.
That is not what this thread is about.
That is not what this thread is about.
That is not what this thread is about.
That is not what this thread is about.
That is not what this thread is about.
That is not what this thread is about.
Please do start a thread about sustainable, clean farming. That would be great. In the right place.
That is not what this thread is about.
That is not what this thread is about.
That is not what this thread is about.
That is not what this thread is about.
That is not what this thread is about.
That is not what this thread is about.
That is not what this thread is about.
That is not what this thread is about.
That is not what this thread is about.
That is not what this thread is about.
That is not what this thread is about.
That is not what this thread is about.
Can you at least tell us what you're smoking?
I'd hate to miss out on the good stuff
HuckleB
(35,773 posts)SamKnause
(13,108 posts)Poisoning the food supply could cause health problems.
Poisoning our soil could cause health problems.
Poisoning our water could cause health problems.
Poisoning our air could cause health problems.
Poisoning people could cause health problems.
Poisoning our animals could cause health problems.
Zorra
(27,670 posts)board encourage people to buy and eat pesticide laden food where both the pesticides and food are produced by big agribusiness, snd try to discourage people from eating food that is grown without being sprayed with chemical pesticides, herbicides, or fungicides, has no poisons on it, and that is generally produced on small family farms.
What is wrong with this picture, and what do these posters have to gain by encouraging people to buy and eat pesticide laden foods produced by big agribusiness?
Recommend.
lpbk2713
(42,763 posts)of course.
We're still fighting the same fight since the passing of Cesar Chavez without much progress.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)were based on Chemicals used in WWII.
MattBaggins
(7,904 posts)Organic...farmers....use...pesticides..too
They just have a silly belief where their combinations of carbon, nitrogen and phosphate are magical and special and not at all like other combinations of carbon, nitrogen and phosphate.
Berlum
(7,044 posts)MattBaggins
(7,904 posts)Not.......always
Toxicity, LD50, MED, and half life don't care how the bonds between the atoms were made.
Berlum
(7,044 posts)It's important that people know about the dangers of synthetic chemical pesticides. You are doing a fabulous job.
gollygee
(22,336 posts)Hydrogen and Oxygen can make water, or hydrogen peroxide, both made up of hydrogen and oxygen, and it isn't magical that they make two different things.
flamingdem
(39,314 posts)Or similar that is dumped in South America and used as a defoliant.
It's not just happening here.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)in our area were almost expected to die of cancer.
flamingdem
(39,314 posts)Or something else?