General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTeapublicans force hospitals to close and cause infants to die, because they hate Obama.
http://bluntandcranky.wordpress.com/2014/02/18/teapublicans-force-hospitals-to-close-and-cause-infants-to-die-because-they-hate-obama/"Deny it all you want, but that is whats happening. In Red states that have refused to take free Federal money for Medicaid expansion, hospitals are closing and babies are dying. Each and every state that is refusing Medicaid Expansion is run by Teabagging Republicans who hates them some Obama. Click the links if you dont believe it. So its clear: these slimy creeps are willing to see you and your kids die, so just so they can go nanny-nanny-boo-boo to the President of the United States.
You have to wonder why an allegedly pro-life party would deliberately ensure the deaths of thousands of people, including infants. One also wonders why a party that loves state-level governance is passing on billions of dollars in free money. The reason is plain and simple: they hate our President and anything that has his name anywhere near it.
Today as this is being written, hospitals are preparing to close. People whose lives could have been saved are dying. And it is for petty political payback, by a bunch of vindictive Republicans who are willing to see innocent blood shed in order to inflict harm on our President. Thats a lot of blood on the paws of those scumbag Red politicians.
And if you vote Republican, Gentle Reader, there is blood on your hands, too. If you dont love dead babies, then dont vote for Repubs. If you dont like dead senior citizens, dont vote for Repubs.
If you DO vote for a GOP candidate, you express your support for deliberately causing the death of thousands of your fellow citizens. By your choice we will know you. "
A load of source material at the link.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Very important information that needs to be spread far and wide.
Republicans don't care if Americans die.
riqster
(13,986 posts)Not sure if supporting and gleefully causing those deaths counts as "caring". But it sure as Hell ain't indifference.
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)Yesterday I met a lady who has a cyst in her ovary and is not eligible to get any insurance she needs to have surgery.
riqster
(13,986 posts)Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)randr
(12,412 posts)Those that suffer should be broadcast every day.
napkinz
(17,199 posts)Simone Sanner
February 6, 2014
Dr. Steffie Woolhandler is co-author of the new study Opting Out Of Medicaid Expansion: the Health And Financial Impacts. The new study just released has found up to 17,000 people will die as a result of the refusal of red state governors to participate in expanded Medicaid programs.
There are 8 million people who will not receive coverage under the new law that are eligible for it. Of that 8 million, as many as 17,000 people will die having not gotten the medical care those in blue states have access to. Another 750,000 will suffer from untreated depression, diabetics will not have access to medication, and women will not have access to pap smears and mammograms.
Woolhandler attributes this to a political move on the part of red state governors, as the program is 100% completely funded by the federal government for the first three years. After those three years have passed, 90% of the costs will be funded by the federal government.
States making the investment in their people will see an approximate 50% reduction in the number of people without any health insurance whatsoever.
read more: http://aattp.org/17000-people-will-die-uninsured-in-red-states-because-gop-leaders-refused-medicaid-expansion/
riqster
(13,986 posts)napkinz
(17,199 posts)napkinz
(17,199 posts)John Prager
February 19, 2014
Arkansas State Rep. Nate Bell (R) made a startling admission during a debate over Medicaid expansion on Tuesday: he doesnt think that uninsured Americans should be educated about their health care options because it costs too much to insure them.
Bell, as a true representative of the pro-birth, pro-death party, offered up an amendment to the states proposed Medicaid expansion bill that would prevent Arkansas from using federal funds to promote the Affordable Care Act. The amendment would bar Arkansas from advertising on television, radio, print, or online, and would put a halt to Arkansas direct mail campaignsa critical part of spreading the word about the Medicaid expansion.
Bell admits that without active marketing, you probably get declining enrollment. However, thats not a problem to himin fact, thats exactly what he wants to accomplish. As Bell explains, Were trying to create a barrier to enrollment. In general, as a conservative, if I have the opportunity to reduce government spending in a program from whats projected Im probably going to take that deal.
You read that correctly, folksBell wants to prevent information from circulating in an effort to prevent the uninsured from obtaining insurance because it saves money. Its almost like he is proposing that lawmakers ration healthcare to those who they deem to be more deserving, kind of like a panel. A panel that decides who lives and who dies.
Where have we heard that before?
http://aattp.org/arkansas-republican-admits-gop-is-acting-as-a-death-panel/
Coyotl
(15,262 posts)Sorry, I'm not letting half them off the hook because their own party so appalled them that they felt obligated to rebrand themselves.
riqster
(13,986 posts)I like concatenating teabagger and republican in a single word, to note that they are the same entity these days. That was in the headline.